A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model
Innovation is directly related to development and competitiveness, and collaborative innovation in universities is an important way to give full play to the advantages of knowledge accumulation. However, because there are multiple party participants, many categories and quantities of data indicators...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Innovation & Knowledge |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2200124X |
| _version_ | 1811165439055626240 |
|---|---|
| author | Feng Ye Jun Sun Yuyun Wang Nadia Nedjah Wei Bu |
| author_facet | Feng Ye Jun Sun Yuyun Wang Nadia Nedjah Wei Bu |
| author_sort | Feng Ye |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Innovation is directly related to development and competitiveness, and collaborative innovation in universities is an important way to give full play to the advantages of knowledge accumulation. However, because there are multiple party participants, many categories and quantities of data indicators and high dimensions of evaluation and comparison and because the process of acquiring knowledge is constantly evolving, the construction of an evaluation method and the corresponding system is a key challenge. Therefore, a performance evaluation method based on an improved order relation analysis (G1)-Criteria Important Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method for collaborative innovation is proposed and discussed. Then, we design and implement a performance evaluation system for university collaborative innovation. Using data from 73 collaborative innovation centers in Jiangsu from 2015 to 2019, a basic data set is constructed to conduct an empirical analysis of performance evaluation. Furthermore, the evaluation results are compared with those of existing comprehensive evaluation methods. The experimental results show that the proposed evaluation method can objectively and effectively evaluate the performance of collaborative innovation centers. In terms of knowledge, this study draws the following key conclusions. The overall level of construction of collaborative innovation centers in Jiangsu Province is relatively high, but the overall development is unbalanced, and the level of performance of different types of collaborative innovation centers is significantly different. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T15:37:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e52a2ee6b0a44526a973e41990a34077 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2444-569X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T15:37:10Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Innovation & Knowledge |
| spelling | doaj.art-e52a2ee6b0a44526a973e41990a340772023-02-13T04:07:17ZengElsevierJournal of Innovation & Knowledge2444-569X2023-01-0181100289A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation modelFeng Ye0Jun Sun1Yuyun Wang2Nadia Nedjah3Wei Bu4School of Computer and Information, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 China; Corresponding author.School of Computer and Information, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 ChinaInstitute of Water Science, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 ChinaDepartment of Electronics Engineering and Telecommunication, Faculty of Engineering, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilInstitute of Science and Technology, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116 ChinaInnovation is directly related to development and competitiveness, and collaborative innovation in universities is an important way to give full play to the advantages of knowledge accumulation. However, because there are multiple party participants, many categories and quantities of data indicators and high dimensions of evaluation and comparison and because the process of acquiring knowledge is constantly evolving, the construction of an evaluation method and the corresponding system is a key challenge. Therefore, a performance evaluation method based on an improved order relation analysis (G1)-Criteria Important Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method for collaborative innovation is proposed and discussed. Then, we design and implement a performance evaluation system for university collaborative innovation. Using data from 73 collaborative innovation centers in Jiangsu from 2015 to 2019, a basic data set is constructed to conduct an empirical analysis of performance evaluation. Furthermore, the evaluation results are compared with those of existing comprehensive evaluation methods. The experimental results show that the proposed evaluation method can objectively and effectively evaluate the performance of collaborative innovation centers. In terms of knowledge, this study draws the following key conclusions. The overall level of construction of collaborative innovation centers in Jiangsu Province is relatively high, but the overall development is unbalanced, and the level of performance of different types of collaborative innovation centers is significantly different.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2200124XCollaborative innovationImproved G1CRITICTOPSISPerformance evaluation |
| spellingShingle | Feng Ye Jun Sun Yuyun Wang Nadia Nedjah Wei Bu A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Collaborative innovation Improved G1 CRITIC TOPSIS Performance evaluation |
| title | A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model |
| title_full | A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model |
| title_fullStr | A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model |
| title_full_unstemmed | A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model |
| title_short | A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model |
| title_sort | novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved g1 critic comprehensive evaluation model |
| topic | Collaborative innovation Improved G1 CRITIC TOPSIS Performance evaluation |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2200124X |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fengye anovelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT junsun anovelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT yuyunwang anovelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT nadianedjah anovelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT weibu anovelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT fengye novelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT junsun novelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT yuyunwang novelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT nadianedjah novelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel AT weibu novelmethodfortheperformanceevaluationofinstitutionalizedcollaborativeinnovationusinganimprovedg1criticcomprehensiveevaluationmodel |