Evaluation of a small-scale desiccant-based drying system to control corn dryness during storage

Approximately 4.5 billion people worldwide are negatively affected by mycotoxins, especially small-scale farmers in regions that do not have access to energy efficient and appropriately designed drying systems. Mycotoxins are produced by fungi tainting durable commodities (e.g. corn and rice), which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra Mora, Umayr Sufi, Jedediah I. Roach, James F. Thompson, Irwin R. Donis-Gonzalez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2019-02-01
Series:AIMS Agriculture and Food
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.136/fulltext.html
_version_ 1828187717714837504
author Alexandra Mora
Umayr Sufi
Jedediah I. Roach
James F. Thompson
Irwin R. Donis-Gonzalez
author_facet Alexandra Mora
Umayr Sufi
Jedediah I. Roach
James F. Thompson
Irwin R. Donis-Gonzalez
author_sort Alexandra Mora
collection DOAJ
description Approximately 4.5 billion people worldwide are negatively affected by mycotoxins, especially small-scale farmers in regions that do not have access to energy efficient and appropriately designed drying systems. Mycotoxins are produced by fungi tainting durable commodities (e.g. corn and rice), which have been inadequately dehydrated and stored. Controlling produce dryness to below 0.6 water activity (A<sub>w</sub>) is an imperative factor to maintain their safety and quality. Unfortunately, there is a lack of inexpensive, small-scale (&lt;15 kg) technologies to adequately dry and store durable commodities. A potential solution is to utilize small-scale desiccant-based drying systems to reduce and then maintain the optimum A<sub>w</sub> and dry basis moisture content (M<sub>D</sub>). Desiccants, like hygroscopic salts and DryBeads<sup>TM</sup>, can be used to remove the moisture from surrounding commodities and potentially maintain conditions during storage. For small-scale applications, it is important to keep the design low-cost and energy efficient. Utilizing corn (<em>Zea mays</em>) as a model product, the current study aims to evaluate a small-scale desiccant drying system consisting of two stacked 18.9 L (5 gallon) buckets equipped with a centered 51 mm diameter acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) pipe to support a fan (102 mm × 102 mm × 25 mm) to circulate air (mean air-flow = 0.015 m<sup>3</sup>-s <sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, 31.8 cfm). Potassium carbonate (K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>), magnesium chloride (MgCl<sub>2</sub>), sodium iodide (NaI), and DryBeads<sup>TM</sup> were compared against an untreated control in their ability to reduce the A<sub>w</sub> below 0.6 and hold it over 14 days of storage without over-drying the corn. The small-scale desiccant system combined 0.73 kg of each desiccant and 9 kg of corn with an initial M<sub>D</sub> of 19.6% (dry basis). Twelve 50 g corn samples contained in mesh bags were distributed at three levels (top, middle, and bottom) within each bucket to later infer the corn’s final M<sub>D</sub> and A<sub>w</sub>. In addition, temperature (T), and relative humidity (RH) at the three levels were recorded each hour with T/RH sensors. Results indicated that all of the evaluated desiccants significantly (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) reduced the corn’s A<sub>w</sub> below 0.6, in comparison to the untreated control, after 14 days of drying/storage.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:39:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e52cf1a0d41d43068926188b56933fec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2471-2086
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:39:30Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher AIMS Press
record_format Article
series AIMS Agriculture and Food
spelling doaj.art-e52cf1a0d41d43068926188b56933fec2022-12-22T03:41:52ZengAIMS PressAIMS Agriculture and Food2471-20862019-02-014113614810.3934/agrfood.2019.1.136Evaluation of a small-scale desiccant-based drying system to control corn dryness during storageAlexandra Mora0Umayr Sufi1Jedediah I. Roach2James F. Thompson3Irwin R. Donis-Gonzalez4Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USAApproximately 4.5 billion people worldwide are negatively affected by mycotoxins, especially small-scale farmers in regions that do not have access to energy efficient and appropriately designed drying systems. Mycotoxins are produced by fungi tainting durable commodities (e.g. corn and rice), which have been inadequately dehydrated and stored. Controlling produce dryness to below 0.6 water activity (A<sub>w</sub>) is an imperative factor to maintain their safety and quality. Unfortunately, there is a lack of inexpensive, small-scale (&lt;15 kg) technologies to adequately dry and store durable commodities. A potential solution is to utilize small-scale desiccant-based drying systems to reduce and then maintain the optimum A<sub>w</sub> and dry basis moisture content (M<sub>D</sub>). Desiccants, like hygroscopic salts and DryBeads<sup>TM</sup>, can be used to remove the moisture from surrounding commodities and potentially maintain conditions during storage. For small-scale applications, it is important to keep the design low-cost and energy efficient. Utilizing corn (<em>Zea mays</em>) as a model product, the current study aims to evaluate a small-scale desiccant drying system consisting of two stacked 18.9 L (5 gallon) buckets equipped with a centered 51 mm diameter acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) pipe to support a fan (102 mm × 102 mm × 25 mm) to circulate air (mean air-flow = 0.015 m<sup>3</sup>-s <sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, 31.8 cfm). Potassium carbonate (K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>), magnesium chloride (MgCl<sub>2</sub>), sodium iodide (NaI), and DryBeads<sup>TM</sup> were compared against an untreated control in their ability to reduce the A<sub>w</sub> below 0.6 and hold it over 14 days of storage without over-drying the corn. The small-scale desiccant system combined 0.73 kg of each desiccant and 9 kg of corn with an initial M<sub>D</sub> of 19.6% (dry basis). Twelve 50 g corn samples contained in mesh bags were distributed at three levels (top, middle, and bottom) within each bucket to later infer the corn’s final M<sub>D</sub> and A<sub>w</sub>. In addition, temperature (T), and relative humidity (RH) at the three levels were recorded each hour with T/RH sensors. Results indicated that all of the evaluated desiccants significantly (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) reduced the corn’s A<sub>w</sub> below 0.6, in comparison to the untreated control, after 14 days of drying/storage.https://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.136/fulltext.htmlhygroscopic| desiccation| storage| relative humidity| temperature
spellingShingle Alexandra Mora
Umayr Sufi
Jedediah I. Roach
James F. Thompson
Irwin R. Donis-Gonzalez
Evaluation of a small-scale desiccant-based drying system to control corn dryness during storage
AIMS Agriculture and Food
hygroscopic| desiccation| storage| relative humidity| temperature
title Evaluation of a small-scale desiccant-based drying system to control corn dryness during storage
title_full Evaluation of a small-scale desiccant-based drying system to control corn dryness during storage
title_fullStr Evaluation of a small-scale desiccant-based drying system to control corn dryness during storage
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a small-scale desiccant-based drying system to control corn dryness during storage
title_short Evaluation of a small-scale desiccant-based drying system to control corn dryness during storage
title_sort evaluation of a small scale desiccant based drying system to control corn dryness during storage
topic hygroscopic| desiccation| storage| relative humidity| temperature
url https://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.136/fulltext.html
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandramora evaluationofasmallscaledesiccantbaseddryingsystemtocontrolcorndrynessduringstorage
AT umayrsufi evaluationofasmallscaledesiccantbaseddryingsystemtocontrolcorndrynessduringstorage
AT jedediahiroach evaluationofasmallscaledesiccantbaseddryingsystemtocontrolcorndrynessduringstorage
AT jamesfthompson evaluationofasmallscaledesiccantbaseddryingsystemtocontrolcorndrynessduringstorage
AT irwinrdonisgonzalez evaluationofasmallscaledesiccantbaseddryingsystemtocontrolcorndrynessduringstorage