Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries

A three-dimensional, transient computational fluid dynamics analysis was conducted on an idealised geometry of a coronary artery fitted with representative geometries of an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) or a Xience drug-eluting stent (DES) in order to identify and compare areas of dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcus S. Elliott, Jonathan S. Cole, Ross W. Blair, Gary H. Menary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Fluids
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/8/9/241
_version_ 1797580115392069632
author Marcus S. Elliott
Jonathan S. Cole
Ross W. Blair
Gary H. Menary
author_facet Marcus S. Elliott
Jonathan S. Cole
Ross W. Blair
Gary H. Menary
author_sort Marcus S. Elliott
collection DOAJ
description A three-dimensional, transient computational fluid dynamics analysis was conducted on an idealised geometry of a coronary artery fitted with representative geometries of an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) or a Xience drug-eluting stent (DES) in order to identify and compare areas of disturbed flow and potential risk sites. A non-Newtonian viscosity model was used with a transient velocity boundary condition programmed with user-defined functions. At-risk areas were quantified in terms of several parameters linked to restenosis: wall shear stress, time-averaged wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, particle residence time, and shear rate. Results indicated that 71% of the BVS stented surface area had time-averaged wall shear stress values under 0.4 Pa compared to 45% of the DES area. Additionally, high particle residence times were present in 23% and 8% of the BVS and DES areas, respectively, with risk areas identified as being more prominent in close proximity to crowns and link struts. These results suggest an increased risk for thrombosis and neointimal hyperplasia for the BVS compared to the DES, which is in agreement with the outcomes of clinical trials. It is intended that the results of this study may be used as a pre-clinical tool to aid in the design of bioresorbable coronary stents.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:46:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5348ea583274aca9103552fba882c8b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-5521
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:46:45Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fluids
spelling doaj.art-e5348ea583274aca9103552fba882c8b2023-11-19T10:41:15ZengMDPI AGFluids2311-55212023-08-018924110.3390/fluids8090241Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary ArteriesMarcus S. Elliott0Jonathan S. Cole1Ross W. Blair2Gary H. Menary3School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UKSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UKSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UKSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UKA three-dimensional, transient computational fluid dynamics analysis was conducted on an idealised geometry of a coronary artery fitted with representative geometries of an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) or a Xience drug-eluting stent (DES) in order to identify and compare areas of disturbed flow and potential risk sites. A non-Newtonian viscosity model was used with a transient velocity boundary condition programmed with user-defined functions. At-risk areas were quantified in terms of several parameters linked to restenosis: wall shear stress, time-averaged wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, particle residence time, and shear rate. Results indicated that 71% of the BVS stented surface area had time-averaged wall shear stress values under 0.4 Pa compared to 45% of the DES area. Additionally, high particle residence times were present in 23% and 8% of the BVS and DES areas, respectively, with risk areas identified as being more prominent in close proximity to crowns and link struts. These results suggest an increased risk for thrombosis and neointimal hyperplasia for the BVS compared to the DES, which is in agreement with the outcomes of clinical trials. It is intended that the results of this study may be used as a pre-clinical tool to aid in the design of bioresorbable coronary stents.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/8/9/241stentcoronary arterybioresorbable vascular scaffoldcomputational fluid dynamics
spellingShingle Marcus S. Elliott
Jonathan S. Cole
Ross W. Blair
Gary H. Menary
Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries
Fluids
stent
coronary artery
bioresorbable vascular scaffold
computational fluid dynamics
title Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries
title_full Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries
title_fullStr Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries
title_full_unstemmed Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries
title_short Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries
title_sort highlighting hemodynamic risks for bioresorbable stents in coronary arteries
topic stent
coronary artery
bioresorbable vascular scaffold
computational fluid dynamics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/8/9/241
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusselliott highlightinghemodynamicrisksforbioresorbablestentsincoronaryarteries
AT jonathanscole highlightinghemodynamicrisksforbioresorbablestentsincoronaryarteries
AT rosswblair highlightinghemodynamicrisksforbioresorbablestentsincoronaryarteries
AT garyhmenary highlightinghemodynamicrisksforbioresorbablestentsincoronaryarteries