Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries

Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries

A three-dimensional, transient computational fluid dynamics analysis was conducted on an idealised geometry of a coronary artery fitted with representative geometries of an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) or a Xience drug-eluting stent (DES) in order to identify and compare areas of dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Marcus S. Elliott, Jonathan S. Cole, Ross W. Blair, Gary H. Menary
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:	Fluids
Subjects:	stent coronary artery bioresorbable vascular scaffold computational fluid dynamics
Online Access:	https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/8/9/241

Similar Items

Bioresorbable scaffolds: current concepts and future technology
by: Debabrata Dash, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Nanoparticles-reinforced poly-l-lactic acid composite materials as bioresorbable scaffold candidates for coronary stents: insights from mechanical and finite element analysis
by: Toong, Daniel Wee Yee, et al.
Published: (2022)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold for coronary in-stent restenosis: A novel concept
by: Surender Deora, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)

One-Year Results of the Use of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Patients with Different Forms of Coronary Artery Disease as Compared to a Drug-Eluting Stent
by: Nabijon P. Yuldashev, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) for the treatment of native coronary artery stenosis: one year
by: Hazem Khamis, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: Current State of Evidence
by: Sunny Goel, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01)

Bioresorbable vascular stents and drug-eluting stents in treatment of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis
by: Le Ni, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Quality of life of patients with coronary heart disease treated with the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (ABSORB™): 2-year results from the GABI-R-registry
by: Kathrin Pahmeier, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Effect of implantation technique on outcomes in patients receiving bioresorbable scaffolds in various clinical scenarios
by: Luis Ortega-Paz, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions
by: Xiang Peng, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Long-term outcome of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of RCTs
by: Alberto Polimeni, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

Long-term safety and absorption assessment of a novel bioresorbable nitrided iron scaffold in porcine coronary artery
by: Jian-Feng Zheng, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Vascular response to everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents versus everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds – an optical coherence tomography substudy of the EVERBIO II trial
by: Zacharenia Kallinikou, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Management of immediate partial bioresorbable vascular scaffold stent thrombosis
by: Ziad Said Dahdouh, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

Understanding the Impact of Stent and Scaffold Material and Strut Design on Coronary Artery Thrombosis from the Basic and Clinical Points of View
by: Atsushi Sakamoto, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Three-years outcomes of diabetic patients treated with coronary bioresorbable scaffolds
by: Remzi Anadol, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)

Coronary Stent Strut Fractures: Classification, Prevalence and Clinical Associations
by: Katharina Schochlow, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INFLAMMATORY RESPOND OF THE VASCULAR WALL AFTER IMPLANTATION OF BIORESORBABLE SCAFFOLDS AND EVEROLIMUS COVERED STENTS IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
by: N. A. Musikhina, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)

Dissections after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in the POLAR ACS Registry
by: Wojciech Zasada, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Degradation modeling of poly-l-lactide acid (PLLA) bioresorbable vascular scaffold within a coronary artery
by: Lin Shengmao, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Mechanical behavior of polymer-based vs. metallic-based bioresorbable stents
by: Ang, Hui Ying, et al.
Published: (2019)

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Evidences in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease
by: BHARGAV DAVE
Published: (2016-10-01)

Analysis of trends and prospects regarding stents for human blood vessels
by: Jeong Hee Lee, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds technology: current use and future developments
by: Giacchi G, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01)

Bioresorbable scaffolds: History and current knowledge
by: Min Ma, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Long-Term Outcomes After Implantation of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Scaffolds—Insights From an All-Comer Registry
by: Matthias Bossard, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Early and long-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease in real-world clinical practice – insights from the ZABRZE-BVS registry
by: Jacek Piegza, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

The impact of the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug-coated balloons in coronary bifurcation lesions
by: Mostafa Elwany, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

The Development of Design and Manufacture Techniques for Bioresorbable Coronary Artery Stents
by: Liang Wang, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of iron bioresorbable scaffold in neonates with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation
by: Marhisham Che Mood, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

The COBRA II (COmplex Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a fully bioresorbable modified-T stenting strategy versus bifurcation reconstruction with a dedicated self-expanding stent in combination with bioresorbable scaffolds) study: Final 5-year follow-up
by: Johan Bennett, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)

Advances in the development of biodegradable coronary stents: A translational perspective
by: Jiabin Zong, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: a meta-analysis
by: Alberto Polimeni, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (ABSORB BVS); first report in Egyptian patients with 6 month angiographic/IVUS follow up
by: Hazem Khamis, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01)

Acute Mechanical Performance of Magmaris vs. DESolve Bioresorbable Scaffolds in a Real-World Scenario
by: Niklas F. Boeder, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Clinical presentation does not affect acute mechanical performance of the Novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold as assessed by optical coherence tomography
by: Niklas Boeder, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

A case report of a recurrent early and late Bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis: serial angiography and optical coherence tomography findings
by: Cheol Hyun Lee, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

The Future of Cardiovascular Stents: Bioresorbable and Integrated Biosensor Technology
by: Daniel Hoare, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

Recurrent atherosclerosis complications as a mechanism for stent failure
by: Ioannis Andreou, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Magnesium bioresorbable scaffold (Magmaris) versus polymer biodegradable ultrathin drug-eluting stent (Ultimaster) in acute coronary syndrome. Mid-term outcomes (2 years)
by: Adrian Włodarczak, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)