| Summary: | This study aimed to compare the accuracy of real-time trans-tracheal ultrasound (TTUS) with capnography to confirm intubation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) while wearing a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR). This setting reflects increased caution due to contagious diseases. This single-center, prospective, comparative study enrolled patients requiring CPR while wearing a PAPR who visited the emergency department of a tertiary medical center from December 2020 to August 2022. A physician performed the TTUS in real time and recorded the tube placement assessment. Another healthcare provider attached waveform capnography to the tube and recorded end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO<sub>2</sub>) after five ventilations. The accuracy and agreement of both methods compared with direct laryngoscopic visualization of tube placement, and the time taken by both methods was evaluated. Thirty-three patients with cardiac arrest were analyzed. TTUS confirmed tube placement with 100% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, whereas capnography demonstrated 97% accuracy, 96.8% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. The Kappa values for TTUS and capnography compared to direct visualization were 1.0 and 0.7843, respectively. EtCO<sub>2</sub> was measured in 45 (37–59) seconds (median (interquartile range)), whereas TTUS required only 12 (8–23) seconds, indicating that TTUS was significantly faster (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the physician’s TTUS proficiency and image acquisition time. This study demonstrated that TTUS is more accurate and faster than EtCO<sub>2</sub> measurement for confirming endotracheal tube placement during CPR, particularly in the context of PAPR usage in pandemic conditions.
|
|---|