Overdressed and Underexposed or Underdressed and Overexposed?

<p>Judges and public policy makers have transmitted conflicting messages in relation to women&rsquo;s bodies and have made normative judgements about how women are to appear in public. Women who have been judged to be wearing too much are called to undress as they are seen as interfering w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lori G. Beaman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law 2013-12-01
Series:Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2356817
Description
Summary:<p>Judges and public policy makers have transmitted conflicting messages in relation to women&rsquo;s bodies and have made normative judgements about how women are to appear in public. Women who have been judged to be wearing too much are called to undress as they are seen as interfering with the rights of others or being oppressed. Women judged to be wearing too little are urged to clothe themselves to avoid being seen as inviting sexual assault or dressing like always sexually available prostitutes. Juxtaposing these two situations together, the oddness of judicial and public regulation of women&rsquo;s clothing becomes more starkly exposed. This paper examines the shifting nature of equality discourse and the naming of women&rsquo;s oppression; the near-disappearance of patriarchy as an explanatory framework; and the quagmire of women&rsquo;s agency. The concluding section proposes shifting the focus from differences between women's experiences to similarity in order to facilitate critical inquiry, dialogue and strategic action that might re-constitute women&rsquo;s equality in new ways.</p> <hr /><p>Los jueces y los responsables pol&iacute;ticos han transmitido mensajes contradictorios en relaci&oacute;n a las mujeres y han hecho juicios normativos acerca de c&oacute;mo las mujeres deben aparecer en p&uacute;blico. Las mujeres que han sido criticadas por vestir en exceso son llamadas a desvestirse ya que son vistas como una interferencia en los derechos de otros o como oprimidas. Las mujeres juzgadas por vestir m&iacute;nimamente, por su parte, son llamadas a vestirse para evitar ser vistas como una invitaci&oacute;n al asalto sexual o como prostitutas siempre sexualmente disponibles. Yuxtaponiendo estas dos situaciones a la vez, la extravagancia de la regulaci&oacute;n judicial y p&uacute;blica de la vestimenta de las mujeres se expone m&aacute;s crudamente. Este art&iacute;culo examina la naturaleza cambiante del discurso de igualdad y el nombramiento de la opresi&oacute;n de las mujeres, la casi desaparici&oacute;n del patriarcado como un marco explicativo, y el atolladero de acci&oacute;n de las mujeres. En la conclusi&oacute;n se propone cambiar el enfoque de las diferencias entre las experiencias de las mujeres hacia la similitud con el fin de facilitar la investigaci&oacute;n cr&iacute;tica, el di&aacute;logo y la acci&oacute;n estrat&eacute;gica que podr&iacute;an reconstituir la igualdad de las mujeres en nuevas formas.
ISSN:2079-5971