Public involvement could usefully inform ethical review, but rarely does: what are the implications?
Plain English summary Researchers carrying out research in the NHS in England have to obtain approval for their study from an NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC). Involving the public in research helps to ensure studies are ethically acceptable to the people taking part, and therefore supports the R...
Main Authors: | Kristina Staley, Jim Elliott |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Research Involvement and Engagement |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-017-0080-0 |
Similar Items
-
Who should I involve in my research and why? Patients, carers or the public?
by: Kristina Staley, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Learning as an outcome of involvement in research: what are the implications for practice, reporting and evaluation?
by: Kristina Staley, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Patients with severe mental illness and the ethical challenges related to confidentiality during family involvement: A scoping review
by: Marit Helene Hem, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
by: Kristina Staley, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards
by: Raksha Pandya-Wood, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)