A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities

A growing number of cities are investing in green infrastructure to foster urban resilience and sustainability. While these nature-based solutions are often promoted on the basis of their multifunctionality, in practice, most studies and plans focus on a single benefit, such as stormwater management...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sara Meerow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2019-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab502c
_version_ 1797747894700212224
author Sara Meerow
author_facet Sara Meerow
author_sort Sara Meerow
collection DOAJ
description A growing number of cities are investing in green infrastructure to foster urban resilience and sustainability. While these nature-based solutions are often promoted on the basis of their multifunctionality, in practice, most studies and plans focus on a single benefit, such as stormwater management. This represents a missed opportunity to strategically site green infrastructure to leverage social and ecological co-benefits. To address this gap, this paper builds on existing modeling approaches for green infrastructure planning to create a more generalizable tool for comparing spatial tradeoffs and synergistic ‘hotspots’ for multiple desired benefits. I apply the model to three diverse coastal megacities: New York City, Los Angeles (United States), and Manila (Philippines), enabling cross-city comparisons for the first time. Spatial multi-criteria evaluation is used to examine how strategic areas for green infrastructure development across the cities change depending on which benefit is prioritized. GIS layers corresponding to six planning priorities (managing stormwater, reducing social vulnerability, increasing access to green space, improving air quality, reducing the urban heat island effect, and increasing landscape connectivity) are mapped and spatial tradeoffs assessed. Criteria are also weighted to reflect local stakeholders’ desired outcomes as determined through surveys and stakeholder meetings and combined to identify high priority areas for green infrastructure development. To extend the model’s utility as a decision-support tool, an interactive web-based application is developed that allows any user to change the criteria weights and visualize the resulting hotspots in real time. The model empirically illustrates the complexities of planning green infrastructure in different urban contexts, while also demonstrating a flexible approach for more participatory, strategic, and multifunctional planning of green infrastructure in cities around the world.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:58:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e543d1b4cfe04a84b3a7efe4d83a7a24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:58:06Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-e543d1b4cfe04a84b3a7efe4d83a7a242023-08-09T14:48:04ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262019-01-01141212501110.1088/1748-9326/ab502cA green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacitiesSara Meerow0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6935-1832School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University , United States of AmericaA growing number of cities are investing in green infrastructure to foster urban resilience and sustainability. While these nature-based solutions are often promoted on the basis of their multifunctionality, in practice, most studies and plans focus on a single benefit, such as stormwater management. This represents a missed opportunity to strategically site green infrastructure to leverage social and ecological co-benefits. To address this gap, this paper builds on existing modeling approaches for green infrastructure planning to create a more generalizable tool for comparing spatial tradeoffs and synergistic ‘hotspots’ for multiple desired benefits. I apply the model to three diverse coastal megacities: New York City, Los Angeles (United States), and Manila (Philippines), enabling cross-city comparisons for the first time. Spatial multi-criteria evaluation is used to examine how strategic areas for green infrastructure development across the cities change depending on which benefit is prioritized. GIS layers corresponding to six planning priorities (managing stormwater, reducing social vulnerability, increasing access to green space, improving air quality, reducing the urban heat island effect, and increasing landscape connectivity) are mapped and spatial tradeoffs assessed. Criteria are also weighted to reflect local stakeholders’ desired outcomes as determined through surveys and stakeholder meetings and combined to identify high priority areas for green infrastructure development. To extend the model’s utility as a decision-support tool, an interactive web-based application is developed that allows any user to change the criteria weights and visualize the resulting hotspots in real time. The model empirically illustrates the complexities of planning green infrastructure in different urban contexts, while also demonstrating a flexible approach for more participatory, strategic, and multifunctional planning of green infrastructure in cities around the world.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab502cgreen infrastructureecosystem servicesmegacitiesurban sustainabilityspatial planningurban resilience
spellingShingle Sara Meerow
A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities
Environmental Research Letters
green infrastructure
ecosystem services
megacities
urban sustainability
spatial planning
urban resilience
title A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities
title_full A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities
title_fullStr A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities
title_full_unstemmed A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities
title_short A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities
title_sort green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities
topic green infrastructure
ecosystem services
megacities
urban sustainability
spatial planning
urban resilience
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab502c
work_keys_str_mv AT sarameerow agreeninfrastructurespatialplanningmodelforevaluatingecosystemservicetradeoffsandsynergiesacrossthreecoastalmegacities
AT sarameerow greeninfrastructurespatialplanningmodelforevaluatingecosystemservicetradeoffsandsynergiesacrossthreecoastalmegacities