Restoration of Midwest Oak Barrens: Structural Manipulation or Process-only?
We investigated vegetation responses in terms of canopy, ground-layer diversity, and ecological species groups using two restoration treatments at two degraded oak barren and savanna sites in central Wisconsin, USA. The two restoration models tested were (1) process-only, which reintroduced fire in...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2003-12-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol7/iss2/art10/ |
| _version_ | 1829496654248542208 |
|---|---|
| author | Scott Nielsen Chad Kirschbaum Alan Haney |
| author_facet | Scott Nielsen Chad Kirschbaum Alan Haney |
| author_sort | Scott Nielsen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We investigated vegetation responses in terms of canopy, ground-layer diversity, and ecological species groups using two restoration treatments at two degraded oak barren and savanna sites in central Wisconsin, USA. The two restoration models tested were (1) process-only, which reintroduced fire in the form of prescribed burning, and (2) structural manipulation, which used prescribed burning following selective timber removal. Both methods have been widely promoted, debated, and investigated in the fire-prone ecosystems of western North America, but they have not been studied in midwestern ecosystems. Vegetation was monitored in permanent quadrats prior to and following treatment applications. All treatment responses were compared against trends at control sites. We used diversity, canopy, and cover estimates within ecological groups between pre- and post-treatment periods as our response. Effect size was calculated, and the statistical significance of effects was determined using one-factor analysis of variance. Following treatments, canopy levels were restored to prior savanna levels with structural manipulation, but failed to respond to process-only approaches. Likewise, multiple positive responses were detected in the ground layer with structural manipulation, but few with process-only treatments. Despite initial responses, ground-layer restoration appears to be constrained by the dominance of Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvanica). Many savanna forbs, legumes, and C4 graminoids were missing. We presume that 70 yr of fire suppression and associated succession to oak woodlands were largely responsible for sedge conversion and the loss of savanna species. Despite observed limitations, structural manipulation treatments appeared to be more effective than process-only approaches. Sites with holdover savanna species that have not been dominated by sedge should be targeted for immediate restoration before further losses occur. Further investigation of sedge mat thresholds and long-term restoration dynamics is required. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T07:36:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e55bd67d5a5c4948a18cb214cada8415 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1708-3087 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T07:36:00Z |
| publishDate | 2003-12-01 |
| publisher | Resilience Alliance |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-e55bd67d5a5c4948a18cb214cada84152022-12-21T22:39:13ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872003-12-01721010.5751/ES-00536-070210536Restoration of Midwest Oak Barrens: Structural Manipulation or Process-only?Scott Nielsen0Chad Kirschbaum1Alan Haney2University of AlbertaUniversity of MichiganUniversity of Wisconsin-Stevens PointWe investigated vegetation responses in terms of canopy, ground-layer diversity, and ecological species groups using two restoration treatments at two degraded oak barren and savanna sites in central Wisconsin, USA. The two restoration models tested were (1) process-only, which reintroduced fire in the form of prescribed burning, and (2) structural manipulation, which used prescribed burning following selective timber removal. Both methods have been widely promoted, debated, and investigated in the fire-prone ecosystems of western North America, but they have not been studied in midwestern ecosystems. Vegetation was monitored in permanent quadrats prior to and following treatment applications. All treatment responses were compared against trends at control sites. We used diversity, canopy, and cover estimates within ecological groups between pre- and post-treatment periods as our response. Effect size was calculated, and the statistical significance of effects was determined using one-factor analysis of variance. Following treatments, canopy levels were restored to prior savanna levels with structural manipulation, but failed to respond to process-only approaches. Likewise, multiple positive responses were detected in the ground layer with structural manipulation, but few with process-only treatments. Despite initial responses, ground-layer restoration appears to be constrained by the dominance of Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvanica). Many savanna forbs, legumes, and C4 graminoids were missing. We presume that 70 yr of fire suppression and associated succession to oak woodlands were largely responsible for sedge conversion and the loss of savanna species. Despite observed limitations, structural manipulation treatments appeared to be more effective than process-only approaches. Sites with holdover savanna species that have not been dominated by sedge should be targeted for immediate restoration before further losses occur. Further investigation of sedge mat thresholds and long-term restoration dynamics is required.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol7/iss2/art10/Carex pensylvanica</I>diversityWisconsinholdover speciesmodal speciesoak barrensprocess-onlyrestorationsavannasstructural manipulation |
| spellingShingle | Scott Nielsen Chad Kirschbaum Alan Haney Restoration of Midwest Oak Barrens: Structural Manipulation or Process-only? Ecology and Society Carex pensylvanica</I> diversity Wisconsin holdover species modal species oak barrens process-only restoration savannas structural manipulation |
| title | Restoration of Midwest Oak Barrens: Structural Manipulation or Process-only? |
| title_full | Restoration of Midwest Oak Barrens: Structural Manipulation or Process-only? |
| title_fullStr | Restoration of Midwest Oak Barrens: Structural Manipulation or Process-only? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Restoration of Midwest Oak Barrens: Structural Manipulation or Process-only? |
| title_short | Restoration of Midwest Oak Barrens: Structural Manipulation or Process-only? |
| title_sort | restoration of midwest oak barrens structural manipulation or process only |
| topic | Carex pensylvanica</I> diversity Wisconsin holdover species modal species oak barrens process-only restoration savannas structural manipulation |
| url | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol7/iss2/art10/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT scottnielsen restorationofmidwestoakbarrensstructuralmanipulationorprocessonly AT chadkirschbaum restorationofmidwestoakbarrensstructuralmanipulationorprocessonly AT alanhaney restorationofmidwestoakbarrensstructuralmanipulationorprocessonly |