The importance of being relevant:Modulation of magnitude representations
The current study aims to answer two main questions. First, is there a difference between the representations of the numerical and the physical properties of visually presented numbers? Second, can the relevancy of the dimension change its representation? In a numerical Stroop task, participants wer...
Main Authors: | Tali eLeibovich, Liana eDiesendruck, Orly eRubinsten, Avishai eHenik |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00369/full |
Similar Items
-
Quantities, amounts, and the numerical core system
by: Avishai eHenik, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Number symbols are processed more automatically than nonsymbolic numerical magnitudes: Findings from a Symbolic-Nonsymbolic Stroop task
by: H. Moriah Sokolowski, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
The emotional valence of a conflict: Implications from synesthesia
by: Amit ePerry, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Link between cognitive neuroscience and education: The case of clinical assessment of developmental dyscalculia
by: Orly eRubinsten
Published: (2015-05-01) -
Symbolic number: The integration of magnitude and spatial representations in children aged 6 to 8 years.
by: Sonia eWhite, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)