Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy?
Abstract Objective Controversial opinions exist for aortic valve replacement (AVR) through partial upper sternotomy in obese patients. Moreover, this study sought to investigate the potential clinical advantage of partial upper sternotomy aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR) over conventional full st...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01926-3 |
| _version_ | 1818504880016326656 |
|---|---|
| author | Xian-Biao Xie Xiao-Fu Dai Zhi-Huang Qiu De-Bin Jiang Qing-Song Wu Yi Dong Liang-Wan Chen |
| author_facet | Xian-Biao Xie Xiao-Fu Dai Zhi-Huang Qiu De-Bin Jiang Qing-Song Wu Yi Dong Liang-Wan Chen |
| author_sort | Xian-Biao Xie |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Objective Controversial opinions exist for aortic valve replacement (AVR) through partial upper sternotomy in obese patients. Moreover, this study sought to investigate the potential clinical advantage of partial upper sternotomy aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR) over conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement (con-AVR) in obese patients. Methods This was a retrospective and observational study. From January 2015 to December 2020, a total of 184 obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg m2] patients undergoing isolated primary AVR were included: 98 patients underwent conventional full sternotomy, and 86 patients underwent partial upper sternotomy. Propensity score (PS) matching was applied to eliminate the bassline imbalances in the mini-AVR and the con-AVR groups. Results After one-to-one propensity score matching, two groups of 60 patients were obtained. No in-hospital death occurred in the two groups. In addition, cardiopulmonary bypass time and total operative time were similar across the 2 groups, but the aortic cross-clamp time was significantly shorter in the con-AVR group (P = .0.022). The amount of mediastinal drainage at 48 h after surgery (P = 0.018) and postoperative blood transfusions (P = 0.014) were significantly lower in the mini-AVR group. There was no difference in ventilation time (P = .0.145), but a shorter intensive care unit stay time (P = 0.021) in the mini-AVR group. Conclusion This study demonstrates that aortic valve replacement through a mini-AVR in obese patients is a safe and effective procedure. It outperformed con-AVR in terms of blood loss, blood product transfusion, and ICU stay. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T21:43:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e5816f9bd2954b1fb0508f6b028a9b0b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1749-8090 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T21:43:12Z |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery |
| spelling | doaj.art-e5816f9bd2954b1fb0508f6b028a9b0b2022-12-22T01:32:26ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902022-08-011711610.1186/s13019-022-01926-3Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy?Xian-Biao Xie0Xiao-Fu Dai1Zhi-Huang Qiu2De-Bin Jiang3Qing-Song Wu4Yi Dong5Liang-Wan Chen6Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityAbstract Objective Controversial opinions exist for aortic valve replacement (AVR) through partial upper sternotomy in obese patients. Moreover, this study sought to investigate the potential clinical advantage of partial upper sternotomy aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR) over conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement (con-AVR) in obese patients. Methods This was a retrospective and observational study. From January 2015 to December 2020, a total of 184 obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg m2] patients undergoing isolated primary AVR were included: 98 patients underwent conventional full sternotomy, and 86 patients underwent partial upper sternotomy. Propensity score (PS) matching was applied to eliminate the bassline imbalances in the mini-AVR and the con-AVR groups. Results After one-to-one propensity score matching, two groups of 60 patients were obtained. No in-hospital death occurred in the two groups. In addition, cardiopulmonary bypass time and total operative time were similar across the 2 groups, but the aortic cross-clamp time was significantly shorter in the con-AVR group (P = .0.022). The amount of mediastinal drainage at 48 h after surgery (P = 0.018) and postoperative blood transfusions (P = 0.014) were significantly lower in the mini-AVR group. There was no difference in ventilation time (P = .0.145), but a shorter intensive care unit stay time (P = 0.021) in the mini-AVR group. Conclusion This study demonstrates that aortic valve replacement through a mini-AVR in obese patients is a safe and effective procedure. It outperformed con-AVR in terms of blood loss, blood product transfusion, and ICU stay.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01926-3Aortic valve replacementObesityPartial upper sternotomy |
| spellingShingle | Xian-Biao Xie Xiao-Fu Dai Zhi-Huang Qiu De-Bin Jiang Qing-Song Wu Yi Dong Liang-Wan Chen Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy? Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Aortic valve replacement Obesity Partial upper sternotomy |
| title | Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy? |
| title_full | Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy? |
| title_fullStr | Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy? |
| title_short | Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy? |
| title_sort | do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy |
| topic | Aortic valve replacement Obesity Partial upper sternotomy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01926-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xianbiaoxie doobesepatientsbenefitfromisolatedaorticvalvereplacementthroughapartialuppersternotomy AT xiaofudai doobesepatientsbenefitfromisolatedaorticvalvereplacementthroughapartialuppersternotomy AT zhihuangqiu doobesepatientsbenefitfromisolatedaorticvalvereplacementthroughapartialuppersternotomy AT debinjiang doobesepatientsbenefitfromisolatedaorticvalvereplacementthroughapartialuppersternotomy AT qingsongwu doobesepatientsbenefitfromisolatedaorticvalvereplacementthroughapartialuppersternotomy AT yidong doobesepatientsbenefitfromisolatedaorticvalvereplacementthroughapartialuppersternotomy AT liangwanchen doobesepatientsbenefitfromisolatedaorticvalvereplacementthroughapartialuppersternotomy |