Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case
Fog conditions at the offshore wind farm Horns Rev 2 were photographed on 16 April 2018. In this study, we present the results of an analysis of the meteorological conditions on the day of the photographs. The aim of the study was to examine satellite images, meteorological observations, wind turbin...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8014 |
_version_ | 1797381287146684416 |
---|---|
author | Charlotte Bay Hasager Nicolai Gayle Nygaard Gregory S. Poulos |
author_facet | Charlotte Bay Hasager Nicolai Gayle Nygaard Gregory S. Poulos |
author_sort | Charlotte Bay Hasager |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Fog conditions at the offshore wind farm Horns Rev 2 were photographed on 16 April 2018. In this study, we present the results of an analysis of the meteorological conditions on the day of the photographs. The aim of the study was to examine satellite images, meteorological observations, wind turbine data, lidar data, reanalysis data, and wake and blockage model results to assess whether wind farm blockage was a likely cause for the formation of fog upstream of the wind farm. The analysis indicated the advection of warm and moist air mass from the southwest over a cool ocean, causing cold sea fog. Wind speeds at hub height were slightly above cut-in, and there was a strong veer in the shallow stable boundary layer. The most important finding is that the wake and blockage model indicated stagnant air mass arcs to the south and west of the wind farm. In the photographs, sea fog is visible in approximately the same area. Therefore, it is likely that the reduced wind triggered the sea fog condensation due to blockage in this area. A discrepancy between the blockage model and sea fog in the photographs appears in the southwest direction. Slightly higher winds might have occurred locally in a southwesterly direction, which may have dissolved sea fog. The wake model predicted long and narrow wind turbine wakes similar to those observed in the photographs. The novelty of the study is new evidence of wind farm blockage. It fills the gap in knowledge about flow in wind farms. Implications for future research include advanced modeling of flow phenomena near large offshore wind farms relevant to wind farm operators. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T20:49:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e584023cee564272ba031feed8aec472 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1073 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T20:49:15Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Energies |
spelling | doaj.art-e584023cee564272ba031feed8aec4722023-12-22T14:05:49ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-12-011624801410.3390/en16248014Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo CaseCharlotte Bay Hasager0Nicolai Gayle Nygaard1Gregory S. Poulos2Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, DenmarkØrsted A/S, Kraftværksvej 53, 7000 Fredericia, DenmarkArcVera Renewables, 1301 Arapahoe St. Ste 105, Golden, CO 80401, USAFog conditions at the offshore wind farm Horns Rev 2 were photographed on 16 April 2018. In this study, we present the results of an analysis of the meteorological conditions on the day of the photographs. The aim of the study was to examine satellite images, meteorological observations, wind turbine data, lidar data, reanalysis data, and wake and blockage model results to assess whether wind farm blockage was a likely cause for the formation of fog upstream of the wind farm. The analysis indicated the advection of warm and moist air mass from the southwest over a cool ocean, causing cold sea fog. Wind speeds at hub height were slightly above cut-in, and there was a strong veer in the shallow stable boundary layer. The most important finding is that the wake and blockage model indicated stagnant air mass arcs to the south and west of the wind farm. In the photographs, sea fog is visible in approximately the same area. Therefore, it is likely that the reduced wind triggered the sea fog condensation due to blockage in this area. A discrepancy between the blockage model and sea fog in the photographs appears in the southwest direction. Slightly higher winds might have occurred locally in a southwesterly direction, which may have dissolved sea fog. The wake model predicted long and narrow wind turbine wakes similar to those observed in the photographs. The novelty of the study is new evidence of wind farm blockage. It fills the gap in knowledge about flow in wind farms. Implications for future research include advanced modeling of flow phenomena near large offshore wind farms relevant to wind farm operators.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8014wind farm blockagewake modelmeteorological conditionsfog |
spellingShingle | Charlotte Bay Hasager Nicolai Gayle Nygaard Gregory S. Poulos Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case Energies wind farm blockage wake model meteorological conditions fog |
title | Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case |
title_full | Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case |
title_fullStr | Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case |
title_full_unstemmed | Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case |
title_short | Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case |
title_sort | wind farm blockage revealed by fog the 2018 horns rev photo case |
topic | wind farm blockage wake model meteorological conditions fog |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT charlottebayhasager windfarmblockagerevealedbyfogthe2018hornsrevphotocase AT nicolaigaylenygaard windfarmblockagerevealedbyfogthe2018hornsrevphotocase AT gregoryspoulos windfarmblockagerevealedbyfogthe2018hornsrevphotocase |