Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case

Fog conditions at the offshore wind farm Horns Rev 2 were photographed on 16 April 2018. In this study, we present the results of an analysis of the meteorological conditions on the day of the photographs. The aim of the study was to examine satellite images, meteorological observations, wind turbin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte Bay Hasager, Nicolai Gayle Nygaard, Gregory S. Poulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8014
_version_ 1797381287146684416
author Charlotte Bay Hasager
Nicolai Gayle Nygaard
Gregory S. Poulos
author_facet Charlotte Bay Hasager
Nicolai Gayle Nygaard
Gregory S. Poulos
author_sort Charlotte Bay Hasager
collection DOAJ
description Fog conditions at the offshore wind farm Horns Rev 2 were photographed on 16 April 2018. In this study, we present the results of an analysis of the meteorological conditions on the day of the photographs. The aim of the study was to examine satellite images, meteorological observations, wind turbine data, lidar data, reanalysis data, and wake and blockage model results to assess whether wind farm blockage was a likely cause for the formation of fog upstream of the wind farm. The analysis indicated the advection of warm and moist air mass from the southwest over a cool ocean, causing cold sea fog. Wind speeds at hub height were slightly above cut-in, and there was a strong veer in the shallow stable boundary layer. The most important finding is that the wake and blockage model indicated stagnant air mass arcs to the south and west of the wind farm. In the photographs, sea fog is visible in approximately the same area. Therefore, it is likely that the reduced wind triggered the sea fog condensation due to blockage in this area. A discrepancy between the blockage model and sea fog in the photographs appears in the southwest direction. Slightly higher winds might have occurred locally in a southwesterly direction, which may have dissolved sea fog. The wake model predicted long and narrow wind turbine wakes similar to those observed in the photographs. The novelty of the study is new evidence of wind farm blockage. It fills the gap in knowledge about flow in wind farms. Implications for future research include advanced modeling of flow phenomena near large offshore wind farms relevant to wind farm operators.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:49:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e584023cee564272ba031feed8aec472
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:49:15Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-e584023cee564272ba031feed8aec4722023-12-22T14:05:49ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-12-011624801410.3390/en16248014Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo CaseCharlotte Bay Hasager0Nicolai Gayle Nygaard1Gregory S. Poulos2Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, DenmarkØrsted A/S, Kraftværksvej 53, 7000 Fredericia, DenmarkArcVera Renewables, 1301 Arapahoe St. Ste 105, Golden, CO 80401, USAFog conditions at the offshore wind farm Horns Rev 2 were photographed on 16 April 2018. In this study, we present the results of an analysis of the meteorological conditions on the day of the photographs. The aim of the study was to examine satellite images, meteorological observations, wind turbine data, lidar data, reanalysis data, and wake and blockage model results to assess whether wind farm blockage was a likely cause for the formation of fog upstream of the wind farm. The analysis indicated the advection of warm and moist air mass from the southwest over a cool ocean, causing cold sea fog. Wind speeds at hub height were slightly above cut-in, and there was a strong veer in the shallow stable boundary layer. The most important finding is that the wake and blockage model indicated stagnant air mass arcs to the south and west of the wind farm. In the photographs, sea fog is visible in approximately the same area. Therefore, it is likely that the reduced wind triggered the sea fog condensation due to blockage in this area. A discrepancy between the blockage model and sea fog in the photographs appears in the southwest direction. Slightly higher winds might have occurred locally in a southwesterly direction, which may have dissolved sea fog. The wake model predicted long and narrow wind turbine wakes similar to those observed in the photographs. The novelty of the study is new evidence of wind farm blockage. It fills the gap in knowledge about flow in wind farms. Implications for future research include advanced modeling of flow phenomena near large offshore wind farms relevant to wind farm operators.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8014wind farm blockagewake modelmeteorological conditionsfog
spellingShingle Charlotte Bay Hasager
Nicolai Gayle Nygaard
Gregory S. Poulos
Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case
Energies
wind farm blockage
wake model
meteorological conditions
fog
title Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case
title_full Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case
title_fullStr Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case
title_full_unstemmed Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case
title_short Wind Farm Blockage Revealed by Fog: The 2018 Horns Rev Photo Case
title_sort wind farm blockage revealed by fog the 2018 horns rev photo case
topic wind farm blockage
wake model
meteorological conditions
fog
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8014
work_keys_str_mv AT charlottebayhasager windfarmblockagerevealedbyfogthe2018hornsrevphotocase
AT nicolaigaylenygaard windfarmblockagerevealedbyfogthe2018hornsrevphotocase
AT gregoryspoulos windfarmblockagerevealedbyfogthe2018hornsrevphotocase