The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Chest pain is responsible for millions of visits to the emergency department (ED) annually. Cardiac ultrasound can detect ischemic changes, but varying accuracy estimates have been reported in previous studies. We synthetized the available evidence to yield more precise estimates...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Virginia Zarama, María Camila Arango-Granados, Ramiro Manzano-Nunez, James P. Sheppard, Nia Roberts, Annette Plüddemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-03-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01192-3
_version_ 1827315784640102400
author Virginia Zarama
María Camila Arango-Granados
Ramiro Manzano-Nunez
James P. Sheppard
Nia Roberts
Annette Plüddemann
author_facet Virginia Zarama
María Camila Arango-Granados
Ramiro Manzano-Nunez
James P. Sheppard
Nia Roberts
Annette Plüddemann
author_sort Virginia Zarama
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Chest pain is responsible for millions of visits to the emergency department (ED) annually. Cardiac ultrasound can detect ischemic changes, but varying accuracy estimates have been reported in previous studies. We synthetized the available evidence to yield more precise estimates of the accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in patients with chest pain in the ED and to assess the effect of different clinical characteristics on test accuracy. Methods A systematic search for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for myocardial ischemia in the ED was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, two trial registries and supplementary methods, from inception to December 6th, 2022. Prospective cohort, cross-sectional, case–control studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included data on diagnostic accuracy were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool and a bivariate hierarchical model was used for meta-analysis with paired Forest and SROC plots used to present the results. Subgroup analyses was conducted on clinically relevant factors. Results Twenty-nine studies were included, with 5043 patients. The overall summary sensitivity was 79.3% (95%CI 69.0–86.8%) and specificity was 87.3% (95%CI 79.9–92.2%), with substantial heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses showed increased sensitivity in studies where ultrasound was conducted at ED admission and increased specificity in studies that excluded patients with previous heart disease, when the target condition was acute coronary syndrome, or when final chart review was used as the reference standard. There was very low certainty in the results based on serious risk of bias and indirectness in most studies. Conclusions Cardiac ultrasound may have a potential role in the diagnostic pathway of myocardial ischemia in the ED; however, a pooled accuracy must be interpreted cautiously given substantial heterogeneity and that important patient and test characteristics affect its diagnostic performance. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023392058).
first_indexed 2024-04-24T23:04:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e584ec9cadcf4a779c6f2d39b57fa593
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-7241
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:04:14Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-e584ec9cadcf4a779c6f2d39b57fa5932024-03-17T12:36:32ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412024-03-0132111610.1186/s13049-024-01192-3The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysisVirginia Zarama0María Camila Arango-Granados1Ramiro Manzano-Nunez2James P. Sheppard3Nia Roberts4Annette Plüddemann5Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad ICESIFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad ICESIClinical Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research InstituteCentre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordBodleian Health Care Libraries, University of OxfordCentre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordAbstract Background Chest pain is responsible for millions of visits to the emergency department (ED) annually. Cardiac ultrasound can detect ischemic changes, but varying accuracy estimates have been reported in previous studies. We synthetized the available evidence to yield more precise estimates of the accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in patients with chest pain in the ED and to assess the effect of different clinical characteristics on test accuracy. Methods A systematic search for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for myocardial ischemia in the ED was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, two trial registries and supplementary methods, from inception to December 6th, 2022. Prospective cohort, cross-sectional, case–control studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included data on diagnostic accuracy were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool and a bivariate hierarchical model was used for meta-analysis with paired Forest and SROC plots used to present the results. Subgroup analyses was conducted on clinically relevant factors. Results Twenty-nine studies were included, with 5043 patients. The overall summary sensitivity was 79.3% (95%CI 69.0–86.8%) and specificity was 87.3% (95%CI 79.9–92.2%), with substantial heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses showed increased sensitivity in studies where ultrasound was conducted at ED admission and increased specificity in studies that excluded patients with previous heart disease, when the target condition was acute coronary syndrome, or when final chart review was used as the reference standard. There was very low certainty in the results based on serious risk of bias and indirectness in most studies. Conclusions Cardiac ultrasound may have a potential role in the diagnostic pathway of myocardial ischemia in the ED; however, a pooled accuracy must be interpreted cautiously given substantial heterogeneity and that important patient and test characteristics affect its diagnostic performance. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023392058).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01192-3EchocardiographyEmergency departmentIschemiaMyocardial infarctionPOCUSPoint-of-care
spellingShingle Virginia Zarama
María Camila Arango-Granados
Ramiro Manzano-Nunez
James P. Sheppard
Nia Roberts
Annette Plüddemann
The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Echocardiography
Emergency department
Ischemia
Myocardial infarction
POCUS
Point-of-care
title The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Echocardiography
Emergency department
Ischemia
Myocardial infarction
POCUS
Point-of-care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01192-3
work_keys_str_mv AT virginiazarama thediagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariacamilaarangogranados thediagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramiromanzanonunez thediagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jamespsheppard thediagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT niaroberts thediagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT annettepluddemann thediagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT virginiazarama diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariacamilaarangogranados diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramiromanzanonunez diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jamespsheppard diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT niaroberts diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT annettepluddemann diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacultrasoundforacutemyocardialischemiaintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis