Empiric Anticoagulation Therapy in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: An Evaluation of Bleeding Risk Scores Performances in Predicting Bleeding Events

Currently, there is no standardized consensus on anticoagulation (AC) among patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which has an overwhelming bleeding risk. We aimed to compare the patterns of AC in COVID-19 patients and compare two validated risk scores in predicting bleeding events. A retros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mona A. Abdelrahman, Aya Ahmed, Abdullah S. Alanazi, Hasnaa Osama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/17/4965
_version_ 1797494897998036992
author Mona A. Abdelrahman
Aya Ahmed
Abdullah S. Alanazi
Hasnaa Osama
author_facet Mona A. Abdelrahman
Aya Ahmed
Abdullah S. Alanazi
Hasnaa Osama
author_sort Mona A. Abdelrahman
collection DOAJ
description Currently, there is no standardized consensus on anticoagulation (AC) among patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which has an overwhelming bleeding risk. We aimed to compare the patterns of AC in COVID-19 patients and compare two validated risk scores in predicting bleeding events. A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for COVID-19 patients who received empiric anticoagulation therapy. The primary outcomes included bleeding events, survival, and mechanical ventilation needs. We applied the HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores to assess the predictive accuracy, using c-statistics and the receiver operating curve (ROC) method. Of the included patients (<i>n</i> = 921), with a mean age of 58.1 ± 13.2, 51.6% received therapeutic AC and 48.4% received a prophylactic AC dose. Significantly higher values of <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">d</span>-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) among the therapeutic AC users (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were noted with a significantly prolonged duration of hospital stay and mechanical ventilation (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.011, respectively). The mean value of the HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores were 2.53 ± 0.93 and 2.26 ± 1.29, respectively. The difference between the two tested scores for major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was significant (<i>p</i> = 0.026 and 0.036, respectively) with modest bleeding predictive performances. The therapeutic AC was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. HAS-BLED showed greater accuracy than ORBIT in bleeding risk predictability.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:40:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e585caadfb104146b987af737e4e8225
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:40:50Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-e585caadfb104146b987af737e4e82252023-11-23T13:25:15ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-08-011117496510.3390/jcm11174965Empiric Anticoagulation Therapy in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: An Evaluation of Bleeding Risk Scores Performances in Predicting Bleeding EventsMona A. Abdelrahman0Aya Ahmed1Abdullah S. Alanazi2Hasnaa Osama3Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef 2722165, EgyptDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef 2722165, EgyptDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef 2722165, EgyptCurrently, there is no standardized consensus on anticoagulation (AC) among patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which has an overwhelming bleeding risk. We aimed to compare the patterns of AC in COVID-19 patients and compare two validated risk scores in predicting bleeding events. A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for COVID-19 patients who received empiric anticoagulation therapy. The primary outcomes included bleeding events, survival, and mechanical ventilation needs. We applied the HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores to assess the predictive accuracy, using c-statistics and the receiver operating curve (ROC) method. Of the included patients (<i>n</i> = 921), with a mean age of 58.1 ± 13.2, 51.6% received therapeutic AC and 48.4% received a prophylactic AC dose. Significantly higher values of <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">d</span>-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) among the therapeutic AC users (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were noted with a significantly prolonged duration of hospital stay and mechanical ventilation (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.011, respectively). The mean value of the HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores were 2.53 ± 0.93 and 2.26 ± 1.29, respectively. The difference between the two tested scores for major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was significant (<i>p</i> = 0.026 and 0.036, respectively) with modest bleeding predictive performances. The therapeutic AC was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. HAS-BLED showed greater accuracy than ORBIT in bleeding risk predictability.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/17/4965COVID-19anticoagulationbleeding scoreHAS-BLED scoreORBIT score
spellingShingle Mona A. Abdelrahman
Aya Ahmed
Abdullah S. Alanazi
Hasnaa Osama
Empiric Anticoagulation Therapy in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: An Evaluation of Bleeding Risk Scores Performances in Predicting Bleeding Events
Journal of Clinical Medicine
COVID-19
anticoagulation
bleeding score
HAS-BLED score
ORBIT score
title Empiric Anticoagulation Therapy in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: An Evaluation of Bleeding Risk Scores Performances in Predicting Bleeding Events
title_full Empiric Anticoagulation Therapy in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: An Evaluation of Bleeding Risk Scores Performances in Predicting Bleeding Events
title_fullStr Empiric Anticoagulation Therapy in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: An Evaluation of Bleeding Risk Scores Performances in Predicting Bleeding Events
title_full_unstemmed Empiric Anticoagulation Therapy in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: An Evaluation of Bleeding Risk Scores Performances in Predicting Bleeding Events
title_short Empiric Anticoagulation Therapy in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: An Evaluation of Bleeding Risk Scores Performances in Predicting Bleeding Events
title_sort empiric anticoagulation therapy in hospitalized covid 19 patients an evaluation of bleeding risk scores performances in predicting bleeding events
topic COVID-19
anticoagulation
bleeding score
HAS-BLED score
ORBIT score
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/17/4965
work_keys_str_mv AT monaaabdelrahman empiricanticoagulationtherapyinhospitalizedcovid19patientsanevaluationofbleedingriskscoresperformancesinpredictingbleedingevents
AT ayaahmed empiricanticoagulationtherapyinhospitalizedcovid19patientsanevaluationofbleedingriskscoresperformancesinpredictingbleedingevents
AT abdullahsalanazi empiricanticoagulationtherapyinhospitalizedcovid19patientsanevaluationofbleedingriskscoresperformancesinpredictingbleedingevents
AT hasnaaosama empiricanticoagulationtherapyinhospitalizedcovid19patientsanevaluationofbleedingriskscoresperformancesinpredictingbleedingevents