A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems

Geothermal energy is one of the primary sources of clean electricity generation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. In comparison to enhanced geothermal methods based on artificial fracturing, closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) avoid seismicity-induced risk, are independent of reser...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andres Budiono, Suyitno Suyitno, Imron Rosyadi, Afif Faishal, Albert Xaverio Ilyas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/742
_version_ 1797488280363597824
author Andres Budiono
Suyitno Suyitno
Imron Rosyadi
Afif Faishal
Albert Xaverio Ilyas
author_facet Andres Budiono
Suyitno Suyitno
Imron Rosyadi
Afif Faishal
Albert Xaverio Ilyas
author_sort Andres Budiono
collection DOAJ
description Geothermal energy is one of the primary sources of clean electricity generation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. In comparison to enhanced geothermal methods based on artificial fracturing, closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) avoid seismicity-induced risk, are independent of reservoir permeability, and do not require the direct interaction between the fluid and the geothermal reservoir. In recent years, the development of CLGS technologies that offer high energy efficiencies has been explored. Research on coaxial closed-loop geothermal systems (CCLGS) and U-shaped closed-loop geothermal system (UCLGS) systems were reviewed in this paper. These studies were categorized based on their design, modeling methods, and heat transfer performance. It was found that UCLGSs had superior heat transfer performances compared to CCLGS. In addition, UCLGSs that utilized CO<sub>2</sub> as a working fluid were found to be promising technologies that could help in addressing the future challenges associated with zero-emission compliance and green energy demand. Further research to improve the heat transfer performance of CLGS, especially with regards to improvements in wellbore layout, equipment sizing, and its integration with CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies is critical to ensuring the feasibility of this technology in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:59:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5868dd580554580804010de1ef1b13a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:59:51Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-e5868dd580554580804010de1ef1b13a2023-11-23T16:19:07ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-01-0115374210.3390/en15030742A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal SystemsAndres Budiono0Suyitno Suyitno1Imron Rosyadi2Afif Faishal3Albert Xaverio Ilyas4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaGeothermal energy is one of the primary sources of clean electricity generation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. In comparison to enhanced geothermal methods based on artificial fracturing, closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) avoid seismicity-induced risk, are independent of reservoir permeability, and do not require the direct interaction between the fluid and the geothermal reservoir. In recent years, the development of CLGS technologies that offer high energy efficiencies has been explored. Research on coaxial closed-loop geothermal systems (CCLGS) and U-shaped closed-loop geothermal system (UCLGS) systems were reviewed in this paper. These studies were categorized based on their design, modeling methods, and heat transfer performance. It was found that UCLGSs had superior heat transfer performances compared to CCLGS. In addition, UCLGSs that utilized CO<sub>2</sub> as a working fluid were found to be promising technologies that could help in addressing the future challenges associated with zero-emission compliance and green energy demand. Further research to improve the heat transfer performance of CLGS, especially with regards to improvements in wellbore layout, equipment sizing, and its integration with CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies is critical to ensuring the feasibility of this technology in the future.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/742systematic reviewheat transfer performanceclosed loopCLGSenhanced geothermal system
spellingShingle Andres Budiono
Suyitno Suyitno
Imron Rosyadi
Afif Faishal
Albert Xaverio Ilyas
A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems
Energies
systematic review
heat transfer performance
closed loop
CLGS
enhanced geothermal system
title A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems
title_full A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems
title_short A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems
title_sort systematic review of the design and heat transfer performance of enhanced closed loop geothermal systems
topic systematic review
heat transfer performance
closed loop
CLGS
enhanced geothermal system
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/742
work_keys_str_mv AT andresbudiono asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT suyitnosuyitno asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT imronrosyadi asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT afiffaishal asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT albertxaverioilyas asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT andresbudiono systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT suyitnosuyitno systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT imronrosyadi systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT afiffaishal systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems
AT albertxaverioilyas systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems