A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems
Geothermal energy is one of the primary sources of clean electricity generation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. In comparison to enhanced geothermal methods based on artificial fracturing, closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) avoid seismicity-induced risk, are independent of reser...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/742 |
_version_ | 1797488280363597824 |
---|---|
author | Andres Budiono Suyitno Suyitno Imron Rosyadi Afif Faishal Albert Xaverio Ilyas |
author_facet | Andres Budiono Suyitno Suyitno Imron Rosyadi Afif Faishal Albert Xaverio Ilyas |
author_sort | Andres Budiono |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Geothermal energy is one of the primary sources of clean electricity generation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. In comparison to enhanced geothermal methods based on artificial fracturing, closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) avoid seismicity-induced risk, are independent of reservoir permeability, and do not require the direct interaction between the fluid and the geothermal reservoir. In recent years, the development of CLGS technologies that offer high energy efficiencies has been explored. Research on coaxial closed-loop geothermal systems (CCLGS) and U-shaped closed-loop geothermal system (UCLGS) systems were reviewed in this paper. These studies were categorized based on their design, modeling methods, and heat transfer performance. It was found that UCLGSs had superior heat transfer performances compared to CCLGS. In addition, UCLGSs that utilized CO<sub>2</sub> as a working fluid were found to be promising technologies that could help in addressing the future challenges associated with zero-emission compliance and green energy demand. Further research to improve the heat transfer performance of CLGS, especially with regards to improvements in wellbore layout, equipment sizing, and its integration with CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies is critical to ensuring the feasibility of this technology in the future. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T23:59:51Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e5868dd580554580804010de1ef1b13a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1073 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T23:59:51Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Energies |
spelling | doaj.art-e5868dd580554580804010de1ef1b13a2023-11-23T16:19:07ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-01-0115374210.3390/en15030742A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal SystemsAndres Budiono0Suyitno Suyitno1Imron Rosyadi2Afif Faishal3Albert Xaverio Ilyas4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, IndonesiaGeothermal energy is one of the primary sources of clean electricity generation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. In comparison to enhanced geothermal methods based on artificial fracturing, closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) avoid seismicity-induced risk, are independent of reservoir permeability, and do not require the direct interaction between the fluid and the geothermal reservoir. In recent years, the development of CLGS technologies that offer high energy efficiencies has been explored. Research on coaxial closed-loop geothermal systems (CCLGS) and U-shaped closed-loop geothermal system (UCLGS) systems were reviewed in this paper. These studies were categorized based on their design, modeling methods, and heat transfer performance. It was found that UCLGSs had superior heat transfer performances compared to CCLGS. In addition, UCLGSs that utilized CO<sub>2</sub> as a working fluid were found to be promising technologies that could help in addressing the future challenges associated with zero-emission compliance and green energy demand. Further research to improve the heat transfer performance of CLGS, especially with regards to improvements in wellbore layout, equipment sizing, and its integration with CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies is critical to ensuring the feasibility of this technology in the future.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/742systematic reviewheat transfer performanceclosed loopCLGSenhanced geothermal system |
spellingShingle | Andres Budiono Suyitno Suyitno Imron Rosyadi Afif Faishal Albert Xaverio Ilyas A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems Energies systematic review heat transfer performance closed loop CLGS enhanced geothermal system |
title | A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems |
title_full | A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems |
title_short | A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems |
title_sort | systematic review of the design and heat transfer performance of enhanced closed loop geothermal systems |
topic | systematic review heat transfer performance closed loop CLGS enhanced geothermal system |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andresbudiono asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT suyitnosuyitno asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT imronrosyadi asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT afiffaishal asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT albertxaverioilyas asystematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT andresbudiono systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT suyitnosuyitno systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT imronrosyadi systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT afiffaishal systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems AT albertxaverioilyas systematicreviewofthedesignandheattransferperformanceofenhancedclosedloopgeothermalsystems |