In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Cross-cultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment

The dual process model of moral judgment (DPM; Greene et al., 2004) argues that such judgments are influenced by both emotion-laden intuition and controlled reasoning. These influences are associated with distinct neural circuitries and different response tendencies. After reanalyzing data from an e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Adam B. Moore, N. Y. Louis Lee, Brian A. M. Clark, Andrew R. A. Conway
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Cambridge University Press 2011-04-01
Series:	Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:	moral judgment dual process model Ex-Gaussian method culture
Online Access:	https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000139X/type/journal_article

In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Cross-cultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment by Adam B. Moore, N. Y. Louis Lee, Brian A. M. Clark, Andrew R. A. Conway

Published 2011-04-01

Get full text

Article

In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Cross-cultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment

In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Cross-cultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment by Adam B. Moore, N. Y. Louis Lee, Brian A. M. Clark, Andrew R. A. Conway

Similar Items