Bureaucratic and Market Sources of Epistemic Authority

In International Relations (IR) scholarship, the epistemic communities’ framework has gained relevance for explaining the roles of experts in the context of transnational global governance. However, IR scholars have criticized the framework for descriptive reasoning. This paper aims to strengthen it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miloslav Machoň
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy 2022-12-01
Series:Teorie vědy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/549
_version_ 1797724364217516032
author Miloslav Machoň
author_facet Miloslav Machoň
author_sort Miloslav Machoň
collection DOAJ
description In International Relations (IR) scholarship, the epistemic communities’ framework has gained relevance for explaining the roles of experts in the context of transnational global governance. However, IR scholars have criticized the framework for descriptive reasoning. This paper aims to strengthen its explanatory power by following rules of a systematic literature review and by using Desmond’s conception of professionalism to further develop Cross’s model of epistemic community. Desmond introduced his concept of professionalism as a response to bureaucratic and market trends in scientific research and Cross developed her concept of professionalism as a comprehensive reconceptualization of Haas’s original model of an epistemic community. The results confirm compatibility between the two concepts. Following the structure of Cross’s model of professionalism, individual autonomy operationalizes selection and training, collective autonomy covers the face-to-face meetings, and the service provision operationalizes the common culture.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:15:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e593218daae640b5a91aa98f9667d707
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1210-0250
1804-6347
language ces
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:15:16Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy
record_format Article
series Teorie vědy
spelling doaj.art-e593218daae640b5a91aa98f9667d7072023-09-02T10:32:33ZcesCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of PhilosophyTeorie vědy1210-02501804-63472022-12-0144212716710.46938/tv.2022.549411Bureaucratic and Market Sources of Epistemic AuthorityMiloslav Machoň0Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze/Prague University of Economics and BusinessIn International Relations (IR) scholarship, the epistemic communities’ framework has gained relevance for explaining the roles of experts in the context of transnational global governance. However, IR scholars have criticized the framework for descriptive reasoning. This paper aims to strengthen its explanatory power by following rules of a systematic literature review and by using Desmond’s conception of professionalism to further develop Cross’s model of epistemic community. Desmond introduced his concept of professionalism as a response to bureaucratic and market trends in scientific research and Cross developed her concept of professionalism as a comprehensive reconceptualization of Haas’s original model of an epistemic community. The results confirm compatibility between the two concepts. Following the structure of Cross’s model of professionalism, individual autonomy operationalizes selection and training, collective autonomy covers the face-to-face meetings, and the service provision operationalizes the common culture.https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/549epistemic communitiesprofessionalismnew public managementprofessional autonomyservice ideal
spellingShingle Miloslav Machoň
Bureaucratic and Market Sources of Epistemic Authority
Teorie vědy
epistemic communities
professionalism
new public management
professional autonomy
service ideal
title Bureaucratic and Market Sources of Epistemic Authority
title_full Bureaucratic and Market Sources of Epistemic Authority
title_fullStr Bureaucratic and Market Sources of Epistemic Authority
title_full_unstemmed Bureaucratic and Market Sources of Epistemic Authority
title_short Bureaucratic and Market Sources of Epistemic Authority
title_sort bureaucratic and market sources of epistemic authority
topic epistemic communities
professionalism
new public management
professional autonomy
service ideal
url https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/549
work_keys_str_mv AT miloslavmachon bureaucraticandmarketsourcesofepistemicauthority