Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South China

Litter and soil play an important role in influencing hydrological processes and the global water cycle. Artificial afforestation, as a part of vegetation restoration, was constructed in the gully erosion areas of latosol with the objective to prevent erosion. Variations in the hydrological properti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhihua Tu, Suyi Chen, Zexian Chen, Dongshuo Ruan, Wei Zhang, Yujie Han, Lin Han, Kang Wang, Yanping Huang, Jinhui Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/2/360
_version_ 1797620987972288512
author Zhihua Tu
Suyi Chen
Zexian Chen
Dongshuo Ruan
Wei Zhang
Yujie Han
Lin Han
Kang Wang
Yanping Huang
Jinhui Chen
author_facet Zhihua Tu
Suyi Chen
Zexian Chen
Dongshuo Ruan
Wei Zhang
Yujie Han
Lin Han
Kang Wang
Yanping Huang
Jinhui Chen
author_sort Zhihua Tu
collection DOAJ
description Litter and soil play an important role in influencing hydrological processes and the global water cycle. Artificial afforestation, as a part of vegetation restoration, was constructed in the gully erosion areas of latosol with the objective to prevent erosion. Variations in the hydrological properties in soils that have undergone vegetation restoration from gully erosion are not well understood. In this study, we examine the variations in the litter thickness and mass, soil structure and porosity, and hydrological properties of four forest types (eucalyptus–grass forest, bamboo–grass forest, acacia–grass forest, and shrub–grass forest). The results show that the total litter thickness varied from 1.71 to 3.74 cm and was highest in the acacia–grass forest. The total litter mass for the acacia–grass forest, 3.49 ± 0.06 t·ha<sup>−1</sup>, was significantly higher than that for the other forest types. The mass of the undecomposed litter (UL) layer was significantly lower than that of the semi-decomposed litter (SL). (2) The maximum water-retention capacity (<i>W<sub>max</sub></i>) and effective water-retention capacity (<i>W<sub>eff</sub></i>) of the SL layer were greater than those of the UL layer. The <i>W<sub>max</sub></i> and <i>W<sub>eff</sub></i> for the acacia–grass forest were markedly larger than those of the eucalyptus–grass, bamboo–grass, and shrub–grass forests. The water absorption rates of the SL and UL layers were highest during the onset of the immersion experiment, declined exponentially with time, and declined rapidly in the first 2 h. (4) The soil bulk density ranged from 1.46 g·cm<sup>−3</sup> to 1.54 g·cm<sup>−3</sup>, and the total porosity ranged from 32.06% to 37.13%. The soil bulk density increased with the increasing soil depth, while the total porosity decreased gradually. The soil water-holding capacity of the soil layer of 0–60 cm in the acacia–grass forest (301.76 t·ha<sup>−1</sup>) was greater than that of the other forest types. A comprehensive evaluation of the water conservation capacity by the entropy weight method showed that the water conservation capacity was greatest in the acacia–grass forest. The higher water-holding capacity of the acacia–grass forest may be more effective in enhancing rainfall interception, minimizing splash erosion, and decreasing surface runoff. Here, the results indicate that acacia–grass forest restoration can mitigate soil erosion by favoring soil and water conservation, improving the environment in the gully erosion area of latosol.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:49:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e59327d8dd1a4a17abc8719841e3cfb0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:49:20Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-e59327d8dd1a4a17abc8719841e3cfb02023-11-16T20:34:54ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072023-02-0114236010.3390/f14020360Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South ChinaZhihua Tu0Suyi Chen1Zexian Chen2Dongshuo Ruan3Wei Zhang4Yujie Han5Lin Han6Kang Wang7Yanping Huang8Jinhui Chen9Key Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaKey Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaLitter and soil play an important role in influencing hydrological processes and the global water cycle. Artificial afforestation, as a part of vegetation restoration, was constructed in the gully erosion areas of latosol with the objective to prevent erosion. Variations in the hydrological properties in soils that have undergone vegetation restoration from gully erosion are not well understood. In this study, we examine the variations in the litter thickness and mass, soil structure and porosity, and hydrological properties of four forest types (eucalyptus–grass forest, bamboo–grass forest, acacia–grass forest, and shrub–grass forest). The results show that the total litter thickness varied from 1.71 to 3.74 cm and was highest in the acacia–grass forest. The total litter mass for the acacia–grass forest, 3.49 ± 0.06 t·ha<sup>−1</sup>, was significantly higher than that for the other forest types. The mass of the undecomposed litter (UL) layer was significantly lower than that of the semi-decomposed litter (SL). (2) The maximum water-retention capacity (<i>W<sub>max</sub></i>) and effective water-retention capacity (<i>W<sub>eff</sub></i>) of the SL layer were greater than those of the UL layer. The <i>W<sub>max</sub></i> and <i>W<sub>eff</sub></i> for the acacia–grass forest were markedly larger than those of the eucalyptus–grass, bamboo–grass, and shrub–grass forests. The water absorption rates of the SL and UL layers were highest during the onset of the immersion experiment, declined exponentially with time, and declined rapidly in the first 2 h. (4) The soil bulk density ranged from 1.46 g·cm<sup>−3</sup> to 1.54 g·cm<sup>−3</sup>, and the total porosity ranged from 32.06% to 37.13%. The soil bulk density increased with the increasing soil depth, while the total porosity decreased gradually. The soil water-holding capacity of the soil layer of 0–60 cm in the acacia–grass forest (301.76 t·ha<sup>−1</sup>) was greater than that of the other forest types. A comprehensive evaluation of the water conservation capacity by the entropy weight method showed that the water conservation capacity was greatest in the acacia–grass forest. The higher water-holding capacity of the acacia–grass forest may be more effective in enhancing rainfall interception, minimizing splash erosion, and decreasing surface runoff. Here, the results indicate that acacia–grass forest restoration can mitigate soil erosion by favoring soil and water conservation, improving the environment in the gully erosion area of latosol.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/2/360vegetation restorationhydrological propertieslitter layersoil layerlatosol region
spellingShingle Zhihua Tu
Suyi Chen
Zexian Chen
Dongshuo Ruan
Wei Zhang
Yujie Han
Lin Han
Kang Wang
Yanping Huang
Jinhui Chen
Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South China
Forests
vegetation restoration
hydrological properties
litter layer
soil layer
latosol region
title Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South China
title_full Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South China
title_fullStr Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South China
title_full_unstemmed Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South China
title_short Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South China
title_sort hydrological properties of soil and litter layers of four forest types restored in the gully erosion area of latosol in south china
topic vegetation restoration
hydrological properties
litter layer
soil layer
latosol region
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/2/360
work_keys_str_mv AT zhihuatu hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT suyichen hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT zexianchen hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT dongshuoruan hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT weizhang hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT yujiehan hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT linhan hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT kangwang hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT yanpinghuang hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina
AT jinhuichen hydrologicalpropertiesofsoilandlitterlayersoffourforesttypesrestoredinthegullyerosionareaoflatosolinsouthchina