Approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults: prevalence and correlates with functioning

Abstract Despite the clinical relevance of defense mechanisms, there are no published studies in nationally representative samples of their prevalence, correlates, and association with psychosocial functioning. We sought to estimate the prevalence and correlates of 12 defense mechanisms in the gener...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Blanco, Leonie Kampe, Melanie M. Wall, Shang-Min Liu, Shuai Wang, Eve Caligor, Mark Olfson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2023-01-01
Series:Translational Psychiatry
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02303-3
_version_ 1811175720141979648
author Carlos Blanco
Leonie Kampe
Melanie M. Wall
Shang-Min Liu
Shuai Wang
Eve Caligor
Mark Olfson
author_facet Carlos Blanco
Leonie Kampe
Melanie M. Wall
Shang-Min Liu
Shuai Wang
Eve Caligor
Mark Olfson
author_sort Carlos Blanco
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Despite the clinical relevance of defense mechanisms, there are no published studies in nationally representative samples of their prevalence, correlates, and association with psychosocial functioning. We sought to estimate the prevalence and correlates of 12 defense mechanisms in the general adult population by approximating from items used to assess personality traits in the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a representative sample of US adults (N = 36,653). We examined the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of 3 types of defenses mechanisms (pathological, immature, and neurotic). For each defense mechanism, we used the Short-Form 12 to compare psychosocial functioning among 3 groups: those who (1) endorsed the mechanism with self-recognized impairment, (2) endorsed the mechanism without self-recognized impairment, and (3) did not endorse the defense mechanism. The prevalence of defense mechanisms ranged from 13.2% (splitting) to 44.5% (obsessive/controlling behavior). Pathological defenses were more strongly associated with immature defenses (OR = 5.4, 95% CI = 5.2–5.6) than with neurotic defenses (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.9–2.0), whereas the association between immature and neurotic defenses had an intermediate value between the other two (OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 2.1–2.2). Pathological and immature defenses were associated with younger age, having been never married, lower educational attainment, and lower income. After adjusting the crude results for age and sex, individuals who did not endorse a given defense generally had higher scores on the mental health component of the SF-12 than those who endorsed the defense without self-recognized impairment who, in turn, had on average higher scores than those with self-recognized impairment. These results suggest that neurotic, immature, and pathological defense mechanisms are prevalent in the general population and associated with psychosocial impairment. Recognizing defense mechanisms may be important in clinical practice regardless of treatment modality.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T19:41:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5a1424237a446abaf9912525394e4f3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-3188
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T19:41:27Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Translational Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-e5a1424237a446abaf9912525394e4f32023-01-29T12:22:31ZengNature Publishing GroupTranslational Psychiatry2158-31882023-01-011311610.1038/s41398-022-02303-3Approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults: prevalence and correlates with functioningCarlos Blanco0Leonie Kampe1Melanie M. Wall2Shang-Min Liu3Shuai Wang4Eve Caligor5Mark Olfson6National Institute on Drug AbusePsychologische Hochschule BerlinDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric InstituteDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric InstituteDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric InstituteDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric InstituteDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric InstituteAbstract Despite the clinical relevance of defense mechanisms, there are no published studies in nationally representative samples of their prevalence, correlates, and association with psychosocial functioning. We sought to estimate the prevalence and correlates of 12 defense mechanisms in the general adult population by approximating from items used to assess personality traits in the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a representative sample of US adults (N = 36,653). We examined the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of 3 types of defenses mechanisms (pathological, immature, and neurotic). For each defense mechanism, we used the Short-Form 12 to compare psychosocial functioning among 3 groups: those who (1) endorsed the mechanism with self-recognized impairment, (2) endorsed the mechanism without self-recognized impairment, and (3) did not endorse the defense mechanism. The prevalence of defense mechanisms ranged from 13.2% (splitting) to 44.5% (obsessive/controlling behavior). Pathological defenses were more strongly associated with immature defenses (OR = 5.4, 95% CI = 5.2–5.6) than with neurotic defenses (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.9–2.0), whereas the association between immature and neurotic defenses had an intermediate value between the other two (OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 2.1–2.2). Pathological and immature defenses were associated with younger age, having been never married, lower educational attainment, and lower income. After adjusting the crude results for age and sex, individuals who did not endorse a given defense generally had higher scores on the mental health component of the SF-12 than those who endorsed the defense without self-recognized impairment who, in turn, had on average higher scores than those with self-recognized impairment. These results suggest that neurotic, immature, and pathological defense mechanisms are prevalent in the general population and associated with psychosocial impairment. Recognizing defense mechanisms may be important in clinical practice regardless of treatment modality.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02303-3
spellingShingle Carlos Blanco
Leonie Kampe
Melanie M. Wall
Shang-Min Liu
Shuai Wang
Eve Caligor
Mark Olfson
Approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults: prevalence and correlates with functioning
Translational Psychiatry
title Approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults: prevalence and correlates with functioning
title_full Approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults: prevalence and correlates with functioning
title_fullStr Approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults: prevalence and correlates with functioning
title_full_unstemmed Approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults: prevalence and correlates with functioning
title_short Approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults: prevalence and correlates with functioning
title_sort approximating defense mechanisms in a national study of adults prevalence and correlates with functioning
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02303-3
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosblanco approximatingdefensemechanismsinanationalstudyofadultsprevalenceandcorrelateswithfunctioning
AT leoniekampe approximatingdefensemechanismsinanationalstudyofadultsprevalenceandcorrelateswithfunctioning
AT melaniemwall approximatingdefensemechanismsinanationalstudyofadultsprevalenceandcorrelateswithfunctioning
AT shangminliu approximatingdefensemechanismsinanationalstudyofadultsprevalenceandcorrelateswithfunctioning
AT shuaiwang approximatingdefensemechanismsinanationalstudyofadultsprevalenceandcorrelateswithfunctioning
AT evecaligor approximatingdefensemechanismsinanationalstudyofadultsprevalenceandcorrelateswithfunctioning
AT markolfson approximatingdefensemechanismsinanationalstudyofadultsprevalenceandcorrelateswithfunctioning