An efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks.

Often derived from partial correlations or many pairwise analyses, covariance networks represent the inter-relationships among regions and can reveal important topological structures in brain measures from healthy and pathological subjects. However both approaches are not consistent network estimato...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcela I Cespedes, James McGree, Christopher C Drovandi, Kerrie Mengersen, James D Doecke, Jurgen Fripp, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042721?pdf=render
_version_ 1811285460635353088
author Marcela I Cespedes
James McGree
Christopher C Drovandi
Kerrie Mengersen
James D Doecke
Jurgen Fripp
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
author_facet Marcela I Cespedes
James McGree
Christopher C Drovandi
Kerrie Mengersen
James D Doecke
Jurgen Fripp
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
author_sort Marcela I Cespedes
collection DOAJ
description Often derived from partial correlations or many pairwise analyses, covariance networks represent the inter-relationships among regions and can reveal important topological structures in brain measures from healthy and pathological subjects. However both approaches are not consistent network estimators and are sensitive to the value of the tuning parameters. Here, we propose a consistent covariance network estimator by maximising the network likelihood (MNL) which is robust to the tuning parameter. We validate the consistency of our algorithm theoretically and via a simulation study, and contrast these results against two well-known approaches: the graphical LASSO (gLASSO) and Pearson pairwise correlations (PPC) over a range of tuning parameters. The MNL algorithm had a specificity equal to and greater than 0.94 for all sample sizes in the simulation study, and the sensitivity was shown to increase as the sample size increased. The gLASSO and PPC demonstrated a specificity-sensitivity trade-off over a range of values of tuning parameters highlighting the discrepancy in the results for misspecified values. Application of the MNL algorithm to the case study data showed a loss of connections between healthy and impaired groups, and improved ability to identify between lobe connectivity in contrast to gLASSO networks. In this work, we propose the MNL algorithm as an effective approach to find covariance brain networks, which can inform the organisational features in brain-wide analyses, particularly for large sample sizes.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:44:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5aad8d02bc74865a7bcc658232bcabe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:44:26Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-e5aad8d02bc74865a7bcc658232bcabe2022-12-22T03:06:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e019858310.1371/journal.pone.0198583An efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks.Marcela I CespedesJames McGreeChristopher C DrovandiKerrie MengersenJames D DoeckeJurgen FrippAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeOften derived from partial correlations or many pairwise analyses, covariance networks represent the inter-relationships among regions and can reveal important topological structures in brain measures from healthy and pathological subjects. However both approaches are not consistent network estimators and are sensitive to the value of the tuning parameters. Here, we propose a consistent covariance network estimator by maximising the network likelihood (MNL) which is robust to the tuning parameter. We validate the consistency of our algorithm theoretically and via a simulation study, and contrast these results against two well-known approaches: the graphical LASSO (gLASSO) and Pearson pairwise correlations (PPC) over a range of tuning parameters. The MNL algorithm had a specificity equal to and greater than 0.94 for all sample sizes in the simulation study, and the sensitivity was shown to increase as the sample size increased. The gLASSO and PPC demonstrated a specificity-sensitivity trade-off over a range of values of tuning parameters highlighting the discrepancy in the results for misspecified values. Application of the MNL algorithm to the case study data showed a loss of connections between healthy and impaired groups, and improved ability to identify between lobe connectivity in contrast to gLASSO networks. In this work, we propose the MNL algorithm as an effective approach to find covariance brain networks, which can inform the organisational features in brain-wide analyses, particularly for large sample sizes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042721?pdf=render
spellingShingle Marcela I Cespedes
James McGree
Christopher C Drovandi
Kerrie Mengersen
James D Doecke
Jurgen Fripp
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
An efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks.
PLoS ONE
title An efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks.
title_full An efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks.
title_fullStr An efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks.
title_full_unstemmed An efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks.
title_short An efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks.
title_sort efficient algorithm for estimating brain covariance networks
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6042721?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelaicespedes anefficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT jamesmcgree anefficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT christophercdrovandi anefficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT kerriemengersen anefficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT jamesddoecke anefficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT jurgenfripp anefficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT alzheimersdiseaseneuroimaginginitiative anefficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT marcelaicespedes efficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT jamesmcgree efficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT christophercdrovandi efficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT kerriemengersen efficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT jamesddoecke efficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT jurgenfripp efficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks
AT alzheimersdiseaseneuroimaginginitiative efficientalgorithmforestimatingbraincovariancenetworks