Observation of Genetic Gain with Instrumental Insemination of Honeybee Queens

Controlling mating in the honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) is part of one of the greatest challenges for the beekeeping industry’s genetic selection programs due to specific characteristics of their reproduction. Several techniques for supervising honeybee mating with relative effective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ségolène Maucourt, Andrée Rousseau, Frédéric Fortin, Claude Robert, Pierre Giovenazzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Insects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/14/3/301
_version_ 1797611135757713408
author Ségolène Maucourt
Andrée Rousseau
Frédéric Fortin
Claude Robert
Pierre Giovenazzo
author_facet Ségolène Maucourt
Andrée Rousseau
Frédéric Fortin
Claude Robert
Pierre Giovenazzo
author_sort Ségolène Maucourt
collection DOAJ
description Controlling mating in the honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) is part of one of the greatest challenges for the beekeeping industry’s genetic selection programs due to specific characteristics of their reproduction. Several techniques for supervising honeybee mating with relative effective control have been developed over the years to allow honeybee selection. As part of this project, we compared the genetic gains for several colony performance traits, obtained using the BLUP-animal method, according to the selection pressure applied in controlled reproduction (directed fertilization versus instrumental insemination). Our results show similar genetic gains for hygienic behavior and honey production between colonies whether queens were fertilized naturally or via instrumental insemination, as well as similar or lower genetic gains for colonies with queens inseminated for spring development. In addition, we noticed greater fragility in queens following insemination. These findings show that instrumental insemination is an effective tool for reproductive control in genetic selection and for estimating breeding values more precisely. However, this technique does not result in queens of superior genetic quality for commercial purposes.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:23:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5ab11f9a11e475b823c7604b4557f8a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4450
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:23:32Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Insects
spelling doaj.art-e5ab11f9a11e475b823c7604b4557f8a2023-11-17T11:46:42ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502023-03-0114330110.3390/insects14030301Observation of Genetic Gain with Instrumental Insemination of Honeybee QueensSégolène Maucourt0Andrée Rousseau1Frédéric Fortin2Claude Robert3Pierre Giovenazzo4Department of Biology, Vachon Pavillon, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaCentre de Sciences Animales de Deschambault, 120A Chemin du Roy, Deschambault, QC G0A 1S0, CanadaCentre de Développement du porc du Québec, 450-2590 Boulevard Laurier, Québec, QC G1V 4M6, CanadaDepartment of Animal Science, Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaDepartment of Biology, Vachon Pavillon, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaControlling mating in the honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) is part of one of the greatest challenges for the beekeeping industry’s genetic selection programs due to specific characteristics of their reproduction. Several techniques for supervising honeybee mating with relative effective control have been developed over the years to allow honeybee selection. As part of this project, we compared the genetic gains for several colony performance traits, obtained using the BLUP-animal method, according to the selection pressure applied in controlled reproduction (directed fertilization versus instrumental insemination). Our results show similar genetic gains for hygienic behavior and honey production between colonies whether queens were fertilized naturally or via instrumental insemination, as well as similar or lower genetic gains for colonies with queens inseminated for spring development. In addition, we noticed greater fragility in queens following insemination. These findings show that instrumental insemination is an effective tool for reproductive control in genetic selection and for estimating breeding values more precisely. However, this technique does not result in queens of superior genetic quality for commercial purposes.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/14/3/301selection programgenetic gainselection pressureinstrumental inseminationdirected fertilizationbreeding value
spellingShingle Ségolène Maucourt
Andrée Rousseau
Frédéric Fortin
Claude Robert
Pierre Giovenazzo
Observation of Genetic Gain with Instrumental Insemination of Honeybee Queens
Insects
selection program
genetic gain
selection pressure
instrumental insemination
directed fertilization
breeding value
title Observation of Genetic Gain with Instrumental Insemination of Honeybee Queens
title_full Observation of Genetic Gain with Instrumental Insemination of Honeybee Queens
title_fullStr Observation of Genetic Gain with Instrumental Insemination of Honeybee Queens
title_full_unstemmed Observation of Genetic Gain with Instrumental Insemination of Honeybee Queens
title_short Observation of Genetic Gain with Instrumental Insemination of Honeybee Queens
title_sort observation of genetic gain with instrumental insemination of honeybee queens
topic selection program
genetic gain
selection pressure
instrumental insemination
directed fertilization
breeding value
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/14/3/301
work_keys_str_mv AT segolenemaucourt observationofgeneticgainwithinstrumentalinseminationofhoneybeequeens
AT andreerousseau observationofgeneticgainwithinstrumentalinseminationofhoneybeequeens
AT fredericfortin observationofgeneticgainwithinstrumentalinseminationofhoneybeequeens
AT clauderobert observationofgeneticgainwithinstrumentalinseminationofhoneybeequeens
AT pierregiovenazzo observationofgeneticgainwithinstrumentalinseminationofhoneybeequeens