Technical Evaluation Report 33: Evaluating Digital Authoring Tools
As the quality of authoring software increases, online course developers become less reliant on proprietary learning management systems, and develop skills in the design of original, in-house materials and the delivery platforms for them. This report examines the capabilities of digital authoring so...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Athabasca University Press
2004-08-01
|
Series: | International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.irrodl.org/content/v5.2/technote3.html |
_version_ | 1819118644023525376 |
---|---|
author | Russ Wilde |
author_facet | Russ Wilde |
author_sort | Russ Wilde |
collection | DOAJ |
description | As the quality of authoring software increases, online course developers become less reliant on proprietary learning management systems, and develop skills in the design of original, in-house materials and the delivery platforms for them. This report examines the capabilities of digital authoring software tools for the development of learning materials. Seven software tools are evaluated, representing the following categories: single purposes; activity creation; course development and presentation; general presentation; testing and assessment. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T05:52:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e5bfdedca7ab4476b5413187cc5ff53a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1492-3831 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T05:52:09Z |
publishDate | 2004-08-01 |
publisher | Athabasca University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning |
spelling | doaj.art-e5bfdedca7ab4476b5413187cc5ff53a2022-12-21T18:36:50ZengAthabasca University PressInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning1492-38312004-08-0152Technical Evaluation Report 33: Evaluating Digital Authoring ToolsRuss WildeAs the quality of authoring software increases, online course developers become less reliant on proprietary learning management systems, and develop skills in the design of original, in-house materials and the delivery platforms for them. This report examines the capabilities of digital authoring software tools for the development of learning materials. Seven software tools are evaluated, representing the following categories: single purposes; activity creation; course development and presentation; general presentation; testing and assessment.http://www.irrodl.org/content/v5.2/technote3.htmlauthoring software |
spellingShingle | Russ Wilde Technical Evaluation Report 33: Evaluating Digital Authoring Tools International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning authoring software |
title | Technical Evaluation Report 33: Evaluating Digital Authoring Tools |
title_full | Technical Evaluation Report 33: Evaluating Digital Authoring Tools |
title_fullStr | Technical Evaluation Report 33: Evaluating Digital Authoring Tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical Evaluation Report 33: Evaluating Digital Authoring Tools |
title_short | Technical Evaluation Report 33: Evaluating Digital Authoring Tools |
title_sort | technical evaluation report 33 evaluating digital authoring tools |
topic | authoring software |
url | http://www.irrodl.org/content/v5.2/technote3.html |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russwilde technicalevaluationreport33evaluatingdigitalauthoringtools |