What Do Reviewers Want? Reflections on Editing the Journal for the Past Year
The peer review process can be challenging. In this essay, the journal’s editor and editorial assistant present a summary of reviewers’ comments to authors from the past year. In presenting themes across 79 reviews, this essay arms authors with knowledge about reviewers’ expectations for manuscripts...
Main Authors: | Brooke F. Liu, Samantha J. Stanley |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Netherlands Press
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://stars.library.ucf.edu/jicrcr/vol2/iss2/6/ |
Similar Items
-
Reflections on Editing the Journal: Current Status and Future Directions
by: Brooke F. Liu, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Decoupling the scholarly journal
by: Jason ePriem, et al.
Published: (2012-04-01) -
«I Do Not Have Time»—Is This the End of Peer Review in Public Health Sciences?
by: Nino Künzli, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers
by: Andrea Capaccioni
Published: (2022-12-01) -
What is Expected from a Reviewer?
by: Grégoire Jean-François Demets
Published: (2021-12-01)