Efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke: A case-control study

Context: The effect of mirror visual illusions on brain activity has been investigated in a number of studies. Motor imagery can be defined as the covert cognitive process of imagining a movement of your own body (-part) without actually moving that body (-part). Aims: Our aim was to investigate whe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deo Rishi Tripathi, Mahesh Kumar Talele, Surya Bhan Singh, Shipra Chaudhary, Amod Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Al Ameen Medical College 2016-04-01
Series:Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/4%20AJMS%20V9.N2.2016%20p%2084-89.pdf
_version_ 1818336066994700288
author Deo Rishi Tripathi
Mahesh Kumar Talele
Surya Bhan Singh
Shipra Chaudhary
Amod Kumar
author_facet Deo Rishi Tripathi
Mahesh Kumar Talele
Surya Bhan Singh
Shipra Chaudhary
Amod Kumar
author_sort Deo Rishi Tripathi
collection DOAJ
description Context: The effect of mirror visual illusions on brain activity has been investigated in a number of studies. Motor imagery can be defined as the covert cognitive process of imagining a movement of your own body (-part) without actually moving that body (-part). Aims: Our aim was to investigate whether mirror therapy is effective at short-term (at 4wk) and long-term (at 6month) intervals on motor recovery, spasticity, and hand-related functioning of patients with subacute stroke. Methods and Material: The study recruited 40 patients suffering from sub-acute stroke with a male: female ratio of 27:8 of mean age 48.42years (age range 23-70 years). Mirror therapy was given in OPD setting over 5 weekly doses. Both the mirror group and control group participated in a conventional stroke rehabilitation program, 6 days a week, 2 to 3 hours a day with therapist in hospital and 1 hour at home for 4 weeks and follow-up at 6 months . The conventional program consists of neuro-developmental facilitation techniques, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy (if needed). For the same period, the mirror group received an additional 30 minutes of mirror therapy program per day. Statistical analysis used. Results: The mirror therapy treatment compared to the control group showed significant improvement at 4 weeks re-assessment from baseline assessment on hand functioning in Brunnstorm, Action Research Arm test and Functional Independence Measures. The mirror therapy treatment compared to the control group at 6-months of follow up reassessment from 4 weeks assessment showed moderate but insignificant improvement in the Brunnstorm and Action Research Arm test and significant improvement in Functional Independence Measures. Conclusion: In our group of subacute stroke patients, hand function improved more after mirror therapy in addition to a conventional rehabilitation program compared with a control treatment directly after 4 weeks of treatment and at the 6-month follow-up, whereas mirror therapy does not affect spasticity.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:33:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5d84b06c31249a1a8aa5a3e8af2c66c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-1143
0974-1143
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:33:25Z
publishDate 2016-04-01
publisher Al Ameen Medical College
record_format Article
series Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e5d84b06c31249a1a8aa5a3e8af2c66c2022-12-21T23:41:47ZengAl Ameen Medical CollegeAl Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences0974-11430974-11432016-04-0109028489Efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke: A case-control studyDeo Rishi Tripathi0Mahesh Kumar Talele1Surya Bhan Singh2Shipra Chaudhary3Amod Kumar4Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, PGIMER & DR. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi-110001, IndiaDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation, NIMHANS, Bengaluru-560029, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, PGIMER & DR. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi-110001, IndiaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, PGIMER & DR. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi-110001, IndiaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, PGIMER & DR. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi-110001, IndiaContext: The effect of mirror visual illusions on brain activity has been investigated in a number of studies. Motor imagery can be defined as the covert cognitive process of imagining a movement of your own body (-part) without actually moving that body (-part). Aims: Our aim was to investigate whether mirror therapy is effective at short-term (at 4wk) and long-term (at 6month) intervals on motor recovery, spasticity, and hand-related functioning of patients with subacute stroke. Methods and Material: The study recruited 40 patients suffering from sub-acute stroke with a male: female ratio of 27:8 of mean age 48.42years (age range 23-70 years). Mirror therapy was given in OPD setting over 5 weekly doses. Both the mirror group and control group participated in a conventional stroke rehabilitation program, 6 days a week, 2 to 3 hours a day with therapist in hospital and 1 hour at home for 4 weeks and follow-up at 6 months . The conventional program consists of neuro-developmental facilitation techniques, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy (if needed). For the same period, the mirror group received an additional 30 minutes of mirror therapy program per day. Statistical analysis used. Results: The mirror therapy treatment compared to the control group showed significant improvement at 4 weeks re-assessment from baseline assessment on hand functioning in Brunnstorm, Action Research Arm test and Functional Independence Measures. The mirror therapy treatment compared to the control group at 6-months of follow up reassessment from 4 weeks assessment showed moderate but insignificant improvement in the Brunnstorm and Action Research Arm test and significant improvement in Functional Independence Measures. Conclusion: In our group of subacute stroke patients, hand function improved more after mirror therapy in addition to a conventional rehabilitation program compared with a control treatment directly after 4 weeks of treatment and at the 6-month follow-up, whereas mirror therapy does not affect spasticity.http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/4%20AJMS%20V9.N2.2016%20p%2084-89.pdfStrokeMirror TherapyAction Research Arm test
spellingShingle Deo Rishi Tripathi
Mahesh Kumar Talele
Surya Bhan Singh
Shipra Chaudhary
Amod Kumar
Efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke: A case-control study
Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences
Stroke
Mirror Therapy
Action Research Arm test
title Efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke: A case-control study
title_full Efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke: A case-control study
title_fullStr Efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke: A case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke: A case-control study
title_short Efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke: A case-control study
title_sort efficacy of mirror therapy in subacute stroke a case control study
topic Stroke
Mirror Therapy
Action Research Arm test
url http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/4%20AJMS%20V9.N2.2016%20p%2084-89.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT deorishitripathi efficacyofmirrortherapyinsubacutestrokeacasecontrolstudy
AT maheshkumartalele efficacyofmirrortherapyinsubacutestrokeacasecontrolstudy
AT suryabhansingh efficacyofmirrortherapyinsubacutestrokeacasecontrolstudy
AT shiprachaudhary efficacyofmirrortherapyinsubacutestrokeacasecontrolstudy
AT amodkumar efficacyofmirrortherapyinsubacutestrokeacasecontrolstudy