Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX-upgrade and ITER

The study aims to estimate the influence of machine scale size on the behavior of plasma with extrinsic seeded impurities in the scrape-off layer (SOL) and divertor. This is performed through the comparison of plasma boundary simulations using the SOLPS-ITER code including drifts and currents of nit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizaveta Sytova, Richard A. Pitts, Elizaveta Kaveeva, Xavier Bonnin, David Coster, Vladimir Rozhansky, Ilya Senichenkov, Irina Veselova, Sergey Voskoboynikov, Felix Reimold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-05-01
Series:Nuclear Materials and Energy
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352179118303120
_version_ 1819072305190404096
author Elizaveta Sytova
Richard A. Pitts
Elizaveta Kaveeva
Xavier Bonnin
David Coster
Vladimir Rozhansky
Ilya Senichenkov
Irina Veselova
Sergey Voskoboynikov
Felix Reimold
author_facet Elizaveta Sytova
Richard A. Pitts
Elizaveta Kaveeva
Xavier Bonnin
David Coster
Vladimir Rozhansky
Ilya Senichenkov
Irina Veselova
Sergey Voskoboynikov
Felix Reimold
author_sort Elizaveta Sytova
collection DOAJ
description The study aims to estimate the influence of machine scale size on the behavior of plasma with extrinsic seeded impurities in the scrape-off layer (SOL) and divertor. This is performed through the comparison of plasma boundary simulations using the SOLPS-ITER code including drifts and currents of nitrogen (N) and neon (Ne) injection in ITER and ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) geometries. Trends are examined between the two seeding species in each individual device and by a comparison of the differences between the two machines. In the modeling results, the radiated power peak is located near the X-point in the inner divertor for the AUG cases and in the vicinity of the strike points in both divertors in ITER. The simulations also find less Ne impurity ions in the divertor volume than N and more significant Ne radiation inside the separatrix for AUG, consistent with published experimental findings. In ITER, both species radiate mostly from the divertor, in agreement with the existing SOLPS-4.3 simulation database obtained without drifts and with a less sophisticated treatment of parallel impurity transport. Drifts are important players in determining the plasma background for AUG and are comparatively less important in ITER. In both devices, the spatial distribution of the impurity ion density is complex, with their parallel flow patterns correlating with the thermal and friction force balance. Within this isolated modeling study, the principal reasons for different behavior between N and Ne on AUG and ITER appear to be the combination of a stronger drift effect and reduced screening of recycled fuel and impurity from divertor to private flux region on AUG leading to a more extended, colder plasma than in ITER. The increased temperature in the confined region just inside the separatrix on ITER also means that impurity ions reaching this zone are fully ionized and do not contribute significantly to the radiation loss there. On the basis of this study, both N and Ne are found to be acceptable low Z radiators on ITER.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T17:35:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5de0492a3864e2da04521cc515bdf7c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-1791
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T17:35:37Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Nuclear Materials and Energy
spelling doaj.art-e5de0492a3864e2da04521cc515bdf7c2022-12-21T18:55:46ZengElsevierNuclear Materials and Energy2352-17912019-05-01197278Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX-upgrade and ITERElizaveta Sytova0Richard A. Pitts1Elizaveta Kaveeva2Xavier Bonnin3David Coster4Vladimir Rozhansky5Ilya Senichenkov6Irina Veselova7Sergey Voskoboynikov8Felix Reimold9ITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067 St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, France; Max-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, D-85748 Garching, Germany; Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia; Ghent University, Department of Applied physics, Ghent, Belgium; Aix-Marseille Universite, Ecole Doctorale Physique et Sciences de la Matiere, Marseille, France; Corresponding author.ITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067 St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, FrancePeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, RussiaITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067 St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, FranceMax-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, D-85748 Garching, GermanyPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, RussiaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, RussiaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, RussiaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, RussiaMax-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, D-17491 Greifswald, GermanyThe study aims to estimate the influence of machine scale size on the behavior of plasma with extrinsic seeded impurities in the scrape-off layer (SOL) and divertor. This is performed through the comparison of plasma boundary simulations using the SOLPS-ITER code including drifts and currents of nitrogen (N) and neon (Ne) injection in ITER and ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) geometries. Trends are examined between the two seeding species in each individual device and by a comparison of the differences between the two machines. In the modeling results, the radiated power peak is located near the X-point in the inner divertor for the AUG cases and in the vicinity of the strike points in both divertors in ITER. The simulations also find less Ne impurity ions in the divertor volume than N and more significant Ne radiation inside the separatrix for AUG, consistent with published experimental findings. In ITER, both species radiate mostly from the divertor, in agreement with the existing SOLPS-4.3 simulation database obtained without drifts and with a less sophisticated treatment of parallel impurity transport. Drifts are important players in determining the plasma background for AUG and are comparatively less important in ITER. In both devices, the spatial distribution of the impurity ion density is complex, with their parallel flow patterns correlating with the thermal and friction force balance. Within this isolated modeling study, the principal reasons for different behavior between N and Ne on AUG and ITER appear to be the combination of a stronger drift effect and reduced screening of recycled fuel and impurity from divertor to private flux region on AUG leading to a more extended, colder plasma than in ITER. The increased temperature in the confined region just inside the separatrix on ITER also means that impurity ions reaching this zone are fully ionized and do not contribute significantly to the radiation loss there. On the basis of this study, both N and Ne are found to be acceptable low Z radiators on ITER.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352179118303120
spellingShingle Elizaveta Sytova
Richard A. Pitts
Elizaveta Kaveeva
Xavier Bonnin
David Coster
Vladimir Rozhansky
Ilya Senichenkov
Irina Veselova
Sergey Voskoboynikov
Felix Reimold
Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX-upgrade and ITER
Nuclear Materials and Energy
title Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX-upgrade and ITER
title_full Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX-upgrade and ITER
title_fullStr Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX-upgrade and ITER
title_full_unstemmed Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX-upgrade and ITER
title_short Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX-upgrade and ITER
title_sort comparing n versus ne as divertor radiators in asdex upgrade and iter
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352179118303120
work_keys_str_mv AT elizavetasytova comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT richardapitts comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT elizavetakaveeva comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT xavierbonnin comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT davidcoster comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT vladimirrozhansky comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT ilyasenichenkov comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT irinaveselova comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT sergeyvoskoboynikov comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer
AT felixreimold comparingnversusneasdivertorradiatorsinasdexupgradeanditer