weighted blankets, sensory-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder

Background: Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is advocated as a meaningful outcome measure for parents and clinicians using an Ayres Sensory Integration® Intervention (ASI) approach. Although used in several treatment effectiveness studies, reliability of therapist goal writing and scoring has not been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teresa A. May-Benson, Sarah Schoen, Alison Teasdale, Jane Koomar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scholarworks @ WMU 2021-01-01
Series:Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ojot/vol9/iss1/8/
_version_ 1818886818866659328
author Teresa A. May-Benson
Sarah Schoen
Alison Teasdale
Jane Koomar
author_facet Teresa A. May-Benson
Sarah Schoen
Alison Teasdale
Jane Koomar
author_sort Teresa A. May-Benson
collection DOAJ
description Background: Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is advocated as a meaningful outcome measure for parents and clinicians using an Ayres Sensory Integration® Intervention (ASI) approach. Although used in several treatment effectiveness studies, reliability of therapist goal writing and scoring has not been established in this area. Method: Ten occupational therapists and 40 parents of children receiving ASI participated across two clinical sites. The interview therapists and inter-rater therapists wrote GAS goals based on the same goal-setting interviews conducted with parents. Follow-up parent interviews were conducted post-ASI intervention, and the GAS goals were rated by both the interview therapists and inter-rater therapists. Results: Seventy-eight percent of interview therapist and inter-rater therapist-written goals agreed on content. Intra Class Correlation coefficient of agreement between the two sets of raters was .70 for the total score. Control of bias for establishing and rating the projected level of performance and scaled GAS goals was within an acceptable range. Conclusion: Findings contribute reliability evidence for use of GAS with children with sensory processing and integration challenges. Two therapists, from different clinical sites who were unfamiliar with the child, identified goal areas, wrote similar GAS goals based on the same parent interview, and scored goals post intervention with good inter-rater reliability.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T16:27:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5e5bf64a9224b63b9d0425fc0aa33d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2168-6408
2168-6408
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T16:27:23Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Scholarworks @ WMU
record_format Article
series Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
spelling doaj.art-e5e5bf64a9224b63b9d0425fc0aa33d52022-12-21T20:14:19ZengScholarworks @ WMUOpen Journal of Occupational Therapy2168-64082168-64082021-01-0191113https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1693weighted blankets, sensory-based interventions, autism spectrum disorderTeresa A. May-BensonSarah SchoenAlison TeasdaleJane KoomarBackground: Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is advocated as a meaningful outcome measure for parents and clinicians using an Ayres Sensory Integration® Intervention (ASI) approach. Although used in several treatment effectiveness studies, reliability of therapist goal writing and scoring has not been established in this area. Method: Ten occupational therapists and 40 parents of children receiving ASI participated across two clinical sites. The interview therapists and inter-rater therapists wrote GAS goals based on the same goal-setting interviews conducted with parents. Follow-up parent interviews were conducted post-ASI intervention, and the GAS goals were rated by both the interview therapists and inter-rater therapists. Results: Seventy-eight percent of interview therapist and inter-rater therapist-written goals agreed on content. Intra Class Correlation coefficient of agreement between the two sets of raters was .70 for the total score. Control of bias for establishing and rating the projected level of performance and scaled GAS goals was within an acceptable range. Conclusion: Findings contribute reliability evidence for use of GAS with children with sensory processing and integration challenges. Two therapists, from different clinical sites who were unfamiliar with the child, identified goal areas, wrote similar GAS goals based on the same parent interview, and scored goals post intervention with good inter-rater reliability.https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ojot/vol9/iss1/8/sensorygoal attainment scalinginter-rateroutcomessensory processingreliabilitypediatrics
spellingShingle Teresa A. May-Benson
Sarah Schoen
Alison Teasdale
Jane Koomar
weighted blankets, sensory-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder
Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
sensory
goal attainment scaling
inter-rater
outcomes
sensory processing
reliability
pediatrics
title weighted blankets, sensory-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder
title_full weighted blankets, sensory-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder
title_fullStr weighted blankets, sensory-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder
title_full_unstemmed weighted blankets, sensory-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder
title_short weighted blankets, sensory-based interventions, autism spectrum disorder
title_sort weighted blankets sensory based interventions autism spectrum disorder
topic sensory
goal attainment scaling
inter-rater
outcomes
sensory processing
reliability
pediatrics
url https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ojot/vol9/iss1/8/
work_keys_str_mv AT teresaamaybenson weightedblanketssensorybasedinterventionsautismspectrumdisorder
AT sarahschoen weightedblanketssensorybasedinterventionsautismspectrumdisorder
AT alisonteasdale weightedblanketssensorybasedinterventionsautismspectrumdisorder
AT janekoomar weightedblanketssensorybasedinterventionsautismspectrumdisorder