The language deficit: a comparison of the critical thinking skills of Asian students in first and second language contexts

Abstract With a growing number of Asian students attending Western universities, the difficulties they seem to face in adapting to a new academic environment has provoked much discussion amongst educators, particularly with regard to the critical thinking (CT) skills. Many educators have claimed tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Rear
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-09-01
Series:Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40862-017-0038-7
_version_ 1818020338951258112
author David Rear
author_facet David Rear
author_sort David Rear
collection DOAJ
description Abstract With a growing number of Asian students attending Western universities, the difficulties they seem to face in adapting to a new academic environment has provoked much discussion amongst educators, particularly with regard to the critical thinking (CT) skills. Many educators have claimed that, as a result of their cultural and educational backgrounds, Asian students lack the CT skills essential for academic tasks such as essay writing and debates. Other researchers, however, have argued this is due simply to the disadvantages of carrying out studies in a foreign language. In fact, there have been surprisingly few studies directly comparing Asian students’ CT skills in their first compared to their second languages. Those that have been done have tended to employ standardised CT tests which, in their discrete, short-answer format, do not accurately reflect the tasks students carry out in university courses. In this study, therefore, two classes of Japanese university students, all with TOEFL scores high enough to enter Western universities, were asked to carry out an oral and written debate, one class in Japanese and the other in English. Evaluations of their performances by independent raters revealed stark differences between the two classes in their ability to construct and deconstruct arguments, find logical inconsistencies and express themselves clearly and persuasively.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T08:03:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5ef9ecea63243eb9742af6bcfafb0d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2363-5169
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T08:03:48Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
spelling doaj.art-e5ef9ecea63243eb9742af6bcfafb0d22022-12-22T02:04:49ZengSpringerOpenAsian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education2363-51692017-09-012111510.1186/s40862-017-0038-7The language deficit: a comparison of the critical thinking skills of Asian students in first and second language contextsDavid Rear0Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo UniversityAbstract With a growing number of Asian students attending Western universities, the difficulties they seem to face in adapting to a new academic environment has provoked much discussion amongst educators, particularly with regard to the critical thinking (CT) skills. Many educators have claimed that, as a result of their cultural and educational backgrounds, Asian students lack the CT skills essential for academic tasks such as essay writing and debates. Other researchers, however, have argued this is due simply to the disadvantages of carrying out studies in a foreign language. In fact, there have been surprisingly few studies directly comparing Asian students’ CT skills in their first compared to their second languages. Those that have been done have tended to employ standardised CT tests which, in their discrete, short-answer format, do not accurately reflect the tasks students carry out in university courses. In this study, therefore, two classes of Japanese university students, all with TOEFL scores high enough to enter Western universities, were asked to carry out an oral and written debate, one class in Japanese and the other in English. Evaluations of their performances by independent raters revealed stark differences between the two classes in their ability to construct and deconstruct arguments, find logical inconsistencies and express themselves clearly and persuasively.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40862-017-0038-7Critical thinking, international education, Asian learnersCritical thinking testsDebate
spellingShingle David Rear
The language deficit: a comparison of the critical thinking skills of Asian students in first and second language contexts
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Critical thinking, international education, Asian learners
Critical thinking tests
Debate
title The language deficit: a comparison of the critical thinking skills of Asian students in first and second language contexts
title_full The language deficit: a comparison of the critical thinking skills of Asian students in first and second language contexts
title_fullStr The language deficit: a comparison of the critical thinking skills of Asian students in first and second language contexts
title_full_unstemmed The language deficit: a comparison of the critical thinking skills of Asian students in first and second language contexts
title_short The language deficit: a comparison of the critical thinking skills of Asian students in first and second language contexts
title_sort language deficit a comparison of the critical thinking skills of asian students in first and second language contexts
topic Critical thinking, international education, Asian learners
Critical thinking tests
Debate
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40862-017-0038-7
work_keys_str_mv AT davidrear thelanguagedeficitacomparisonofthecriticalthinkingskillsofasianstudentsinfirstandsecondlanguagecontexts
AT davidrear languagedeficitacomparisonofthecriticalthinkingskillsofasianstudentsinfirstandsecondlanguagecontexts