Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses’ consultations

Abstract Background Increasingly healthcare policies emphasise the importance of person-centred, empathic care. Consequently, healthcare professionals are expected to demonstrate the ‘human’ aspects of care in training and in practice. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure is a pati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annemieke P. Bikker, Bridie Fitzpatrick, Douglas Murphy, Lorraine Forster, Stewart W. Mercer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:BMC Nursing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12912-017-0265-8
_version_ 1818057816396529664
author Annemieke P. Bikker
Bridie Fitzpatrick
Douglas Murphy
Lorraine Forster
Stewart W. Mercer
author_facet Annemieke P. Bikker
Bridie Fitzpatrick
Douglas Murphy
Lorraine Forster
Stewart W. Mercer
author_sort Annemieke P. Bikker
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Increasingly healthcare policies emphasise the importance of person-centred, empathic care. Consequently, healthcare professionals are expected to demonstrate the ‘human’ aspects of care in training and in practice. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure is a patient-rated measure of the interpersonal skills of healthcare practitioners. It has been widely validated for use by healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care. This paper reports on the validity and reliability of the CARE Measure with sexual health nurses. Methods Patient questionnaires were collected for 943 consultations with 20 sexual health nurses. Participating patients self-completed the questionnaire immediately after the encounter with the nurse. The questionnaire included the ten item CARE Measure, the Patient Enablement Index, and overall satisfaction instruments. Construct validity was assessed through Spearman’s correlation and principal component analysis. Internal consistence was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha and the inter-rater reliability through Generalisability Theory. Data were collected in 2013 in Scotland. Results Female patients completed 68% of the questionnaires. The mean patient age was 28.8 years (standard deviation 9.8 years). Two of the 20 participating nurses withdrew from the study. Most patients (71.7%) regarded the CARE Measure items as very important to their consultation and the number of ‘not applicable’ and missing responses’ were low (2.6% and 0.1% respectively). The participating nurses had high CARE Measure scores; out of a maximum possible score of 50, the overall mean CARE measure score was 47.8 (standard deviation 4.4). The scores were moderately correlated with patient enablement (rho = 0.232, p = 0.001) and overall satisfaction (rho = 0.377, p = 0.001. Cronbach’s alpha showed the measure’s high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.95), but the inter-rater reliability could not be calculated due to the high achieved CARE Measure scores that varied little between nurses. Conclusions Within this clinical context the CARE Measure has high perceived relevance and face validity. The findings support construct validity and some evidence of reliability. The high CARE Measure scores may have been due to sample bias. A future study which ensures a representative sample of patients on a larger group of nurses is required to determine whether the measure can discriminate between nurses.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T12:50:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e5fde61d97e944a596b2dd845c3b1891
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6955
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T12:50:45Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nursing
spelling doaj.art-e5fde61d97e944a596b2dd845c3b18912022-12-22T01:48:16ZengBMCBMC Nursing1472-69552017-11-011611910.1186/s12912-017-0265-8Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses’ consultationsAnnemieke P. Bikker0Bridie Fitzpatrick1Douglas Murphy2Lorraine Forster3Stewart W. Mercer4Usher Institute for Population Sciences and Informatics, The University of EdinburghGeneral Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of GlasgowSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, Mackenzie BuildingSandyford Sexual Health ServicesGeneral Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of GlasgowAbstract Background Increasingly healthcare policies emphasise the importance of person-centred, empathic care. Consequently, healthcare professionals are expected to demonstrate the ‘human’ aspects of care in training and in practice. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure is a patient-rated measure of the interpersonal skills of healthcare practitioners. It has been widely validated for use by healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care. This paper reports on the validity and reliability of the CARE Measure with sexual health nurses. Methods Patient questionnaires were collected for 943 consultations with 20 sexual health nurses. Participating patients self-completed the questionnaire immediately after the encounter with the nurse. The questionnaire included the ten item CARE Measure, the Patient Enablement Index, and overall satisfaction instruments. Construct validity was assessed through Spearman’s correlation and principal component analysis. Internal consistence was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha and the inter-rater reliability through Generalisability Theory. Data were collected in 2013 in Scotland. Results Female patients completed 68% of the questionnaires. The mean patient age was 28.8 years (standard deviation 9.8 years). Two of the 20 participating nurses withdrew from the study. Most patients (71.7%) regarded the CARE Measure items as very important to their consultation and the number of ‘not applicable’ and missing responses’ were low (2.6% and 0.1% respectively). The participating nurses had high CARE Measure scores; out of a maximum possible score of 50, the overall mean CARE measure score was 47.8 (standard deviation 4.4). The scores were moderately correlated with patient enablement (rho = 0.232, p = 0.001) and overall satisfaction (rho = 0.377, p = 0.001. Cronbach’s alpha showed the measure’s high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.95), but the inter-rater reliability could not be calculated due to the high achieved CARE Measure scores that varied little between nurses. Conclusions Within this clinical context the CARE Measure has high perceived relevance and face validity. The findings support construct validity and some evidence of reliability. The high CARE Measure scores may have been due to sample bias. A future study which ensures a representative sample of patients on a larger group of nurses is required to determine whether the measure can discriminate between nurses.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12912-017-0265-8EmpathySexual health nursesCommunity healthcareValidation studiesCARE measure
spellingShingle Annemieke P. Bikker
Bridie Fitzpatrick
Douglas Murphy
Lorraine Forster
Stewart W. Mercer
Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses’ consultations
BMC Nursing
Empathy
Sexual health nurses
Community healthcare
Validation studies
CARE measure
title Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses’ consultations
title_full Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses’ consultations
title_fullStr Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses’ consultations
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses’ consultations
title_short Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses’ consultations
title_sort assessing the consultation and relational empathy care measure in sexual health nurses consultations
topic Empathy
Sexual health nurses
Community healthcare
Validation studies
CARE measure
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12912-017-0265-8
work_keys_str_mv AT annemiekepbikker assessingtheconsultationandrelationalempathycaremeasureinsexualhealthnursesconsultations
AT bridiefitzpatrick assessingtheconsultationandrelationalempathycaremeasureinsexualhealthnursesconsultations
AT douglasmurphy assessingtheconsultationandrelationalempathycaremeasureinsexualhealthnursesconsultations
AT lorraineforster assessingtheconsultationandrelationalempathycaremeasureinsexualhealthnursesconsultations
AT stewartwmercer assessingtheconsultationandrelationalempathycaremeasureinsexualhealthnursesconsultations