MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE IN ANTI-CLERICAL CRITICISM AND IN RELIGIOUS PRACTICE
The problems of monologue and dialogue as communicative scenarios of religious activity implementation in the modern secular society are investigated in the paper. Dialogue and monologue prospects in religious associations' relations with one another and with the society are analyzed.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kemerovo State University
2013-06-01
|
Series: | Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/105 |
_version_ | 1797781291609882624 |
---|---|
author | E. O. Gavrilov |
author_facet | E. O. Gavrilov |
author_sort | E. O. Gavrilov |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The problems of monologue and dialogue as communicative scenarios of religious activity implementation in the modern secular society are investigated in the paper. Dialogue and monologue prospects in religious associations' relations with one another and with the society are analyzed. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T23:55:36Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e6203a8dedb34b1baac8bdff4fc6aa8c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2078-8975 2078-8983 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T23:55:36Z |
publishDate | 2013-06-01 |
publisher | Kemerovo State University |
record_format | Article |
series | Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета |
spelling | doaj.art-e6203a8dedb34b1baac8bdff4fc6aa8c2023-07-13T12:08:41ZengKemerovo State UniversityВестник Кемеровского государственного университета2078-89752078-89832013-06-0102-1225229105MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE IN ANTI-CLERICAL CRITICISM AND IN RELIGIOUS PRACTICEE. O. Gavrilov0Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitary Service of RussiaThe problems of monologue and dialogue as communicative scenarios of religious activity implementation in the modern secular society are investigated in the paper. Dialogue and monologue prospects in religious associations' relations with one another and with the society are analyzed.https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/105secularizationanti-clericalismreligious pluralismdialoguemonologuerelativitydogmatism |
spellingShingle | E. O. Gavrilov MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE IN ANTI-CLERICAL CRITICISM AND IN RELIGIOUS PRACTICE Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета secularization anti-clericalism religious pluralism dialogue monologue relativity dogmatism |
title | MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE IN ANTI-CLERICAL CRITICISM AND IN RELIGIOUS PRACTICE |
title_full | MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE IN ANTI-CLERICAL CRITICISM AND IN RELIGIOUS PRACTICE |
title_fullStr | MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE IN ANTI-CLERICAL CRITICISM AND IN RELIGIOUS PRACTICE |
title_full_unstemmed | MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE IN ANTI-CLERICAL CRITICISM AND IN RELIGIOUS PRACTICE |
title_short | MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE IN ANTI-CLERICAL CRITICISM AND IN RELIGIOUS PRACTICE |
title_sort | monologue and dialogue in anti clerical criticism and in religious practice |
topic | secularization anti-clericalism religious pluralism dialogue monologue relativity dogmatism |
url | https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eogavrilov monologueanddialogueinanticlericalcriticismandinreligiouspractice |