Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes
Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoral and extraoral ultrasonography evaluations performed with two different types of probes (linear and “hockey stick”) for the visibility of peri-implant bone defects. Material and methods: Fourteen implants were inserted...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2021-08-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Ultrasonography |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2021.0033 |
| _version_ | 1818159990111731712 |
|---|---|
| author | Orhan Kaan Serindere Gozde Belgin Ceren Aktuna Kurt Mehmet Hakan |
| author_facet | Orhan Kaan Serindere Gozde Belgin Ceren Aktuna Kurt Mehmet Hakan |
| author_sort | Orhan Kaan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoral and extraoral ultrasonography evaluations performed with two different types of probes (linear and “hockey stick”) for the visibility of peri-implant bone defects. Material and methods: Fourteen implants were inserted into sheep heads. Peri-implant bone defects were created without knowing the depth, which served as the gold standard for the defects. The defects were scanned with two different probe types (linear and hockey stick probes) extraorally and intraorally, using two different ultrasonography systems. For intra- and interobserver agreements for each probe types, Kappa coefficients were calculated. Results: The lowest ICC values were found in both intra- (ICC = 0.696) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.762) obtained with the extraorally used linear probe. There was a high agreement with the gold standard when using hockey sticky probes intraorally. For both linear probes, there were no significant differences in agreement among the two observers and the gold standard (p >0.05). Conclusions: High agreement was found when using high-frequency hockey stick probes intraorally, which means that they can be used with good effect for the evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one on this subject. Thus, it can be stated that US can be an alternative method of examining defects. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of US in visualizing peri-implant bone defects. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:54:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e635c3ebe9954bcc98b6165dd854f040 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2451-070X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:54:45Z |
| publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Ultrasonography |
| spelling | doaj.art-e635c3ebe9954bcc98b6165dd854f0402022-12-22T00:59:29ZengSciendoJournal of Ultrasonography2451-070X2021-08-01218620621210.15557/jou.2021.0033Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probesOrhan Kaan0Serindere Gozde1Belgin Ceren Aktuna2Kurt Mehmet Hakan3Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay, TurkeyDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay, TurkeyDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, TurkeyBackground: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoral and extraoral ultrasonography evaluations performed with two different types of probes (linear and “hockey stick”) for the visibility of peri-implant bone defects. Material and methods: Fourteen implants were inserted into sheep heads. Peri-implant bone defects were created without knowing the depth, which served as the gold standard for the defects. The defects were scanned with two different probe types (linear and hockey stick probes) extraorally and intraorally, using two different ultrasonography systems. For intra- and interobserver agreements for each probe types, Kappa coefficients were calculated. Results: The lowest ICC values were found in both intra- (ICC = 0.696) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.762) obtained with the extraorally used linear probe. There was a high agreement with the gold standard when using hockey sticky probes intraorally. For both linear probes, there were no significant differences in agreement among the two observers and the gold standard (p >0.05). Conclusions: High agreement was found when using high-frequency hockey stick probes intraorally, which means that they can be used with good effect for the evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one on this subject. Thus, it can be stated that US can be an alternative method of examining defects. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of US in visualizing peri-implant bone defects.https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2021.0033bone defectscone-beam computed tomographyimplant dentistryultrasonography |
| spellingShingle | Orhan Kaan Serindere Gozde Belgin Ceren Aktuna Kurt Mehmet Hakan Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes Journal of Ultrasonography bone defects cone-beam computed tomography implant dentistry ultrasonography |
| title | Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes |
| title_full | Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes |
| title_short | Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes |
| title_sort | evaluation of the visibility of peri implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes |
| topic | bone defects cone-beam computed tomography implant dentistry ultrasonography |
| url | https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2021.0033 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT orhankaan evaluationofthevisibilityofperiimplantbonedefectsusingultrasonographywithtwotypesofprobes AT serinderegozde evaluationofthevisibilityofperiimplantbonedefectsusingultrasonographywithtwotypesofprobes AT belgincerenaktuna evaluationofthevisibilityofperiimplantbonedefectsusingultrasonographywithtwotypesofprobes AT kurtmehmethakan evaluationofthevisibilityofperiimplantbonedefectsusingultrasonographywithtwotypesofprobes |