Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models

<p>The current generation of global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) exhibits a surprisingly cold-biased ensemble-mean mid-20th century global-mean surface temperature anomaly, compared to the previous generation Phase 5 (CMIP5) and to the observed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. M. Flynn, L. Huusko, A. Modak, T. Mauritsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-12-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/15121/2023/acp-23-15121-2023.pdf
_version_ 1797401449787817984
author C. M. Flynn
C. M. Flynn
C. M. Flynn
L. Huusko
L. Huusko
A. Modak
T. Mauritsen
T. Mauritsen
author_facet C. M. Flynn
C. M. Flynn
C. M. Flynn
L. Huusko
L. Huusko
A. Modak
T. Mauritsen
T. Mauritsen
author_sort C. M. Flynn
collection DOAJ
description <p>The current generation of global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) exhibits a surprisingly cold-biased ensemble-mean mid-20th century global-mean surface temperature anomaly, compared to the previous generation Phase 5 (CMIP5) and to the observed mid-century (1940–1970) temperature anomaly. Most CMIP6 models, 31 of 36 models in contrast to 17 of 27 CMIP5 models, are colder than the uncertainty range of the observed anomaly, indicating that the CMIP6 suppressed warming is not caused by a few cold models. However, no clear cause that sufficiently explains the tendency towards suppressed mid-20th century warming emerges. Whereas models that best match observations exclusively exhibit weaker aerosol forcing than that exhibited by colder models, there is not a clear relationship between mid-century temperatures and aerosol forcing. Likewise, no systematic differences emerge among other model aerosol representations, such as inclusion of aerosol–cloud interactions for ice clouds in the model or the type of aerosol model input data set used, nor variations in greenhouse gas forcing or climate sensitivity, that could explain the suppressed warming. This indicates the presence of another cause, or more likely a set of causes, of the suppressed warming in many CMIP6 models. Thus, the prospect of a strong constraint on present-day aerosol forcing based on the mid-century warming is weakened, even if it is encouraging that those models that do match the observed warming best all have relatively weak aerosol forcing.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:10:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e63ea727bf9e4c909885e87b671051df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:10:14Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-e63ea727bf9e4c909885e87b671051df2023-12-07T13:53:11ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242023-12-0123151211513310.5194/acp-23-15121-2023Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 modelsC. M. Flynn0C. M. Flynn1C. M. Flynn2L. Huusko3L. Huusko4A. Modak5T. Mauritsen6T. Mauritsen7Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenBolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, Swedennow at: Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenBolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, SwedenInterdisciplinary Programme in Climate Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenBolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, Sweden<p>The current generation of global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) exhibits a surprisingly cold-biased ensemble-mean mid-20th century global-mean surface temperature anomaly, compared to the previous generation Phase 5 (CMIP5) and to the observed mid-century (1940–1970) temperature anomaly. Most CMIP6 models, 31 of 36 models in contrast to 17 of 27 CMIP5 models, are colder than the uncertainty range of the observed anomaly, indicating that the CMIP6 suppressed warming is not caused by a few cold models. However, no clear cause that sufficiently explains the tendency towards suppressed mid-20th century warming emerges. Whereas models that best match observations exclusively exhibit weaker aerosol forcing than that exhibited by colder models, there is not a clear relationship between mid-century temperatures and aerosol forcing. Likewise, no systematic differences emerge among other model aerosol representations, such as inclusion of aerosol–cloud interactions for ice clouds in the model or the type of aerosol model input data set used, nor variations in greenhouse gas forcing or climate sensitivity, that could explain the suppressed warming. This indicates the presence of another cause, or more likely a set of causes, of the suppressed warming in many CMIP6 models. Thus, the prospect of a strong constraint on present-day aerosol forcing based on the mid-century warming is weakened, even if it is encouraging that those models that do match the observed warming best all have relatively weak aerosol forcing.</p>https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/15121/2023/acp-23-15121-2023.pdf
spellingShingle C. M. Flynn
C. M. Flynn
C. M. Flynn
L. Huusko
L. Huusko
A. Modak
T. Mauritsen
T. Mauritsen
Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models
title_full Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models
title_fullStr Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models
title_full_unstemmed Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models
title_short Strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold-biased mid-century temperatures in CMIP6 models
title_sort strong aerosol cooling alone does not explain cold biased mid century temperatures in cmip6 models
url https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/15121/2023/acp-23-15121-2023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cmflynn strongaerosolcoolingalonedoesnotexplaincoldbiasedmidcenturytemperaturesincmip6models
AT cmflynn strongaerosolcoolingalonedoesnotexplaincoldbiasedmidcenturytemperaturesincmip6models
AT cmflynn strongaerosolcoolingalonedoesnotexplaincoldbiasedmidcenturytemperaturesincmip6models
AT lhuusko strongaerosolcoolingalonedoesnotexplaincoldbiasedmidcenturytemperaturesincmip6models
AT lhuusko strongaerosolcoolingalonedoesnotexplaincoldbiasedmidcenturytemperaturesincmip6models
AT amodak strongaerosolcoolingalonedoesnotexplaincoldbiasedmidcenturytemperaturesincmip6models
AT tmauritsen strongaerosolcoolingalonedoesnotexplaincoldbiasedmidcenturytemperaturesincmip6models
AT tmauritsen strongaerosolcoolingalonedoesnotexplaincoldbiasedmidcenturytemperaturesincmip6models