Effect of a peat-based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets: a case study

ABSTRACTThis study was conducted to evaluate the benefit of a peat-based additive in reducing the neonatal diarrhoea of piglets, according to sow’s parity. From five consecutive batches, a total of 100 Large White x Landrace sows [50 primiparous (PR) and 50 multiparous (ML)] were randomly allocated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulia Ferronato, Samantha Sigolo, Michele Premi, Aldo Prandini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Applied Animal Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09712119.2022.2147182
_version_ 1811311759920726016
author Giulia Ferronato
Samantha Sigolo
Michele Premi
Aldo Prandini
author_facet Giulia Ferronato
Samantha Sigolo
Michele Premi
Aldo Prandini
author_sort Giulia Ferronato
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTThis study was conducted to evaluate the benefit of a peat-based additive in reducing the neonatal diarrhoea of piglets, according to sow’s parity. From five consecutive batches, a total of 100 Large White x Landrace sows [50 primiparous (PR) and 50 multiparous (ML)] were randomly allocated to the control (CTR) or treated (TRT) group. The peat additive was provided to TRT piglets from the day of birth to day 7 of life (6 g/day/head). Overall, PR group resulted in lower piglets performance with higher enteric disease incidence compared with ML group. Compared with ML, PR sows had lower BCS at weaning (P < .001), fewer total piglets born, lower average piglet weaning weight (P < .01) and higher incidence of deaths due to enteric disease (P < .05). Regardless parity, TRT group showed a fewer number of litters affected by enteric disease (P < .05). No significant interaction between sow parity and treatment was observed.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:24:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6458a100b504b6c8f73707af26c36ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0971-2119
0974-1844
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:24:31Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Animal Research
spelling doaj.art-e6458a100b504b6c8f73707af26c36ec2022-12-22T02:50:23ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Applied Animal Research0971-21190974-18442022-12-0150170871410.1080/09712119.2022.2147182Effect of a peat-based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets: a case studyGiulia Ferronato0Samantha Sigolo1Michele Premi2Aldo Prandini3Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture, Environment, Land Planning and Mathematics (DICATAM), Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, ItalyDepartment of Animal Sciences, Food and Nutrition (DIANA), Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Science, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, ItalyDepartment of Animal Sciences, Food and Nutrition (DIANA), Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Science, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, ItalyDepartment of Animal Sciences, Food and Nutrition (DIANA), Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Science, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, ItalyABSTRACTThis study was conducted to evaluate the benefit of a peat-based additive in reducing the neonatal diarrhoea of piglets, according to sow’s parity. From five consecutive batches, a total of 100 Large White x Landrace sows [50 primiparous (PR) and 50 multiparous (ML)] were randomly allocated to the control (CTR) or treated (TRT) group. The peat additive was provided to TRT piglets from the day of birth to day 7 of life (6 g/day/head). Overall, PR group resulted in lower piglets performance with higher enteric disease incidence compared with ML group. Compared with ML, PR sows had lower BCS at weaning (P < .001), fewer total piglets born, lower average piglet weaning weight (P < .01) and higher incidence of deaths due to enteric disease (P < .05). Regardless parity, TRT group showed a fewer number of litters affected by enteric disease (P < .05). No significant interaction between sow parity and treatment was observed.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09712119.2022.2147182Feed additivePeatSuckling pigletEnteric disease
spellingShingle Giulia Ferronato
Samantha Sigolo
Michele Premi
Aldo Prandini
Effect of a peat-based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets: a case study
Journal of Applied Animal Research
Feed additive
Peat
Suckling piglet
Enteric disease
title Effect of a peat-based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets: a case study
title_full Effect of a peat-based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets: a case study
title_fullStr Effect of a peat-based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a peat-based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets: a case study
title_short Effect of a peat-based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets: a case study
title_sort effect of a peat based feed additive and sow parity on the performance of suckling piglets a case study
topic Feed additive
Peat
Suckling piglet
Enteric disease
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09712119.2022.2147182
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliaferronato effectofapeatbasedfeedadditiveandsowparityontheperformanceofsucklingpigletsacasestudy
AT samanthasigolo effectofapeatbasedfeedadditiveandsowparityontheperformanceofsucklingpigletsacasestudy
AT michelepremi effectofapeatbasedfeedadditiveandsowparityontheperformanceofsucklingpigletsacasestudy
AT aldoprandini effectofapeatbasedfeedadditiveandsowparityontheperformanceofsucklingpigletsacasestudy