Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis

Abstract Background This paper compares the postoperative recovery of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA), aiming to determine the optimal diagnosis and treatment plan for appendectomy. Methods Related literature was retrieved from Pu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guangzhe Zhang, Bo Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-05-01
Series:World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00431-1
_version_ 1811324526031536128
author Guangzhe Zhang
Bo Wu
author_facet Guangzhe Zhang
Bo Wu
author_sort Guangzhe Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This paper compares the postoperative recovery of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA), aiming to determine the optimal diagnosis and treatment plan for appendectomy. Methods Related literature was retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases. Articles on LA and OA for AA published between 2010 and 2021 were selected to extract data. Besides, Stata16.0 was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 777 articles were retrieved, and 16 of them were finally selected. Totally, 1251 patients underwent LA, while 898 patients received OA. According to the results of meta-analysis, LA was associated with lower incidence of adverse reactions [OR = 0.257, 95% CI (0.162, 0.408), P < 0.001], shorter operation time (SMD = − 1.802, 95% CI − 2.435, − 1.169; P < 0.001) and hospitalization (SMD = − 1.184, 95% CI − 1.512, − 0.856; P < 0.001). In addition, compared with the OA group, LA was found with less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = − 3.650, 95% CI − 5.088, − 2.212; P < 0.001) and shorter recovery time of gastrointestinal function (SMD = − 3.010, 95% CI − 3.816, − 2.203; P < 0.001). Aside from all these, the counts of leukocyte (SMD = − 0.432, 95% CI: − 0.775, − 0.089; P = 0.013), neutrophil (SMD = − 1.346, 95% CI − 2.560, − 0.133; P = 0.030), and C-reactive protein (SMD = − 2.391, 95% CI − 3.901, − 0.882; P = 0.002) all decreased in a significant manner after LA. Conclusion Compared with OA, LA boasts the advantages of less adverse reactions, shorter operation time and hospitalization, fewer complications, and lower inflammatory response, evidencing its safety and feasibility of applying in the treatment of AA.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:15:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e645ae392695485aaeb5f2a1e01ce44d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-7922
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:15:53Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Emergency Surgery
spelling doaj.art-e645ae392695485aaeb5f2a1e01ce44d2022-12-22T02:43:40ZengBMCWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery1749-79222022-05-0117111010.1186/s13017-022-00431-1Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitisGuangzhe Zhang0Bo Wu1Department of Anorectal Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical UniversityDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical UniversityAbstract Background This paper compares the postoperative recovery of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA), aiming to determine the optimal diagnosis and treatment plan for appendectomy. Methods Related literature was retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases. Articles on LA and OA for AA published between 2010 and 2021 were selected to extract data. Besides, Stata16.0 was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 777 articles were retrieved, and 16 of them were finally selected. Totally, 1251 patients underwent LA, while 898 patients received OA. According to the results of meta-analysis, LA was associated with lower incidence of adverse reactions [OR = 0.257, 95% CI (0.162, 0.408), P < 0.001], shorter operation time (SMD = − 1.802, 95% CI − 2.435, − 1.169; P < 0.001) and hospitalization (SMD = − 1.184, 95% CI − 1.512, − 0.856; P < 0.001). In addition, compared with the OA group, LA was found with less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = − 3.650, 95% CI − 5.088, − 2.212; P < 0.001) and shorter recovery time of gastrointestinal function (SMD = − 3.010, 95% CI − 3.816, − 2.203; P < 0.001). Aside from all these, the counts of leukocyte (SMD = − 0.432, 95% CI: − 0.775, − 0.089; P = 0.013), neutrophil (SMD = − 1.346, 95% CI − 2.560, − 0.133; P = 0.030), and C-reactive protein (SMD = − 2.391, 95% CI − 3.901, − 0.882; P = 0.002) all decreased in a significant manner after LA. Conclusion Compared with OA, LA boasts the advantages of less adverse reactions, shorter operation time and hospitalization, fewer complications, and lower inflammatory response, evidencing its safety and feasibility of applying in the treatment of AA.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00431-1AppendicitisLaparoscopeOpen appendectomyMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Guangzhe Zhang
Bo Wu
Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Appendicitis
Laparoscope
Open appendectomy
Meta-analysis
title Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_full Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_short Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_sort meta analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
topic Appendicitis
Laparoscope
Open appendectomy
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00431-1
work_keys_str_mv AT guangzhezhang metaanalysisoftheclinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicappendectomyinthetreatmentofacuteappendicitis
AT bowu metaanalysisoftheclinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicappendectomyinthetreatmentofacuteappendicitis