Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience

Mohammad Reza Sedghipour, Rana Sorkhabi, Abdollah Shenasi, Hassan DehghanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranBackground: Corneal ulcers often lead to scarring and astigmatism, and significant loss of vision is a common consequence.Objective: To determine t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sedghipour MR, Sorkhabi R, Shenasi A, Dehghan H
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2011-09-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/outcome-of-penetrating-keratoplasty-in-corneal-ulcer-a-single-center-e-a8212
_version_ 1818897252656087040
author Sedghipour MR
Sorkhabi R
Shenasi A
Dehghan H
author_facet Sedghipour MR
Sorkhabi R
Shenasi A
Dehghan H
author_sort Sedghipour MR
collection DOAJ
description Mohammad Reza Sedghipour, Rana Sorkhabi, Abdollah Shenasi, Hassan DehghanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranBackground: Corneal ulcers often lead to scarring and astigmatism, and significant loss of vision is a common consequence.Objective: To determine the rate of graft rejection, one of the most serious concerns with this procedure, and to evaluate the recovery of visual function in those patients for whom the operation was successful.Methods: We describe a retrospective study of 33 corneal ulcer patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK) at the Tabriz Nikookari Eye Hospital.Results: Mean age of the patients was 44 ± 14 years. Most common risk factors for active keratitis were trauma, dry eye, and malnutrition. Culture-positive results included bacterial keratitis (n = 15) and fungal keratitis (n = 5). Perforation was a significant risk factor for therapeutic failure (P < 0.05). Age or gender had no statistically significant effects on the PK outcome (P > 0.05). Postoperative visual acuity had a significant association with preoperative visual acuity (P < 0.01). Graft rejection rate (27.2%) was similar to that reported in the literature.Conclusion: Although lamellar keratoplasty has recently been established, there are practical reasons for continuing the use of PK in centers such as ours, with due attention to the requirement for topical immunosuppression to diminish the rate of graft rejection and antimicrobial treatment to prevent postoperative infection.Keywords: keratitis, ulcerative, graft rejection, perforation 
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:13:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e649930aac3b456abee410db900985b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-5467
1177-5483
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:13:14Z
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-e649930aac3b456abee410db900985b52022-12-21T20:09:12ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54671177-54832011-09-012011default12651268Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experienceSedghipour MRSorkhabi RShenasi ADehghan HMohammad Reza Sedghipour, Rana Sorkhabi, Abdollah Shenasi, Hassan DehghanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranBackground: Corneal ulcers often lead to scarring and astigmatism, and significant loss of vision is a common consequence.Objective: To determine the rate of graft rejection, one of the most serious concerns with this procedure, and to evaluate the recovery of visual function in those patients for whom the operation was successful.Methods: We describe a retrospective study of 33 corneal ulcer patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK) at the Tabriz Nikookari Eye Hospital.Results: Mean age of the patients was 44 ± 14 years. Most common risk factors for active keratitis were trauma, dry eye, and malnutrition. Culture-positive results included bacterial keratitis (n = 15) and fungal keratitis (n = 5). Perforation was a significant risk factor for therapeutic failure (P < 0.05). Age or gender had no statistically significant effects on the PK outcome (P > 0.05). Postoperative visual acuity had a significant association with preoperative visual acuity (P < 0.01). Graft rejection rate (27.2%) was similar to that reported in the literature.Conclusion: Although lamellar keratoplasty has recently been established, there are practical reasons for continuing the use of PK in centers such as ours, with due attention to the requirement for topical immunosuppression to diminish the rate of graft rejection and antimicrobial treatment to prevent postoperative infection.Keywords: keratitis, ulcerative, graft rejection, perforation http://www.dovepress.com/outcome-of-penetrating-keratoplasty-in-corneal-ulcer-a-single-center-e-a8212
spellingShingle Sedghipour MR
Sorkhabi R
Shenasi A
Dehghan H
Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
Clinical Ophthalmology
title Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_full Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_fullStr Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_short Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer: a single-center experience
title_sort outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in corneal ulcer a single center experience
url http://www.dovepress.com/outcome-of-penetrating-keratoplasty-in-corneal-ulcer-a-single-center-e-a8212
work_keys_str_mv AT sedghipourmr outcomeofpenetratingkeratoplastyincornealulcerasinglecenterexperience
AT sorkhabir outcomeofpenetratingkeratoplastyincornealulcerasinglecenterexperience
AT shenasia outcomeofpenetratingkeratoplastyincornealulcerasinglecenterexperience
AT dehghanh outcomeofpenetratingkeratoplastyincornealulcerasinglecenterexperience