Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment

Disordered linkers (DLs) are intrinsically disordered regions that facilitate movement between adjacent functional regions/domains, contributing to many key cellular functions. The recently completed second Critical Assessments of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID2) experiment evaluated DL...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kui Wang, Gang Hu, Zhonghua Wu, Vladimir N. Uversky, Lukasz Kurgan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Biomolecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/14/3/287
_version_ 1797241901216169984
author Kui Wang
Gang Hu
Zhonghua Wu
Vladimir N. Uversky
Lukasz Kurgan
author_facet Kui Wang
Gang Hu
Zhonghua Wu
Vladimir N. Uversky
Lukasz Kurgan
author_sort Kui Wang
collection DOAJ
description Disordered linkers (DLs) are intrinsically disordered regions that facilitate movement between adjacent functional regions/domains, contributing to many key cellular functions. The recently completed second Critical Assessments of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID2) experiment evaluated DL predictions by considering a rather narrow scenario when predicting 40 proteins that are already known to have DLs. We expand this evaluation by using a much larger set of nearly 350 test proteins from CAID2 and by investigating three distinct scenarios: (1) prediction residues in DLs vs. in non-DL regions (typical use of DL predictors); (2) prediction of residues in DLs vs. other disordered residues (to evaluate whether predictors can differentiate residues in DLs from other types of intrinsically disordered residues); and (3) prediction of proteins harboring DLs. We find that several methods provide relatively accurate predictions of DLs in the first scenario. However, only one method, APOD, accurately identifies DLs among other types of disordered residues (scenario 2) and predicts proteins harboring DLs (scenario 3). We also find that APOD’s predictive performance is modest, motivating further research into the development of new and more accurate DL predictors. We note that these efforts will benefit from a growing amount of training data and the availability of sophisticated deep network models and emphasize that future methods should provide accurate results across the three scenarios.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:30:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6503ee864f74734a2905b993a1c623c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2218-273X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:30:41Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biomolecules
spelling doaj.art-e6503ee864f74734a2905b993a1c623c2024-03-27T13:27:52ZengMDPI AGBiomolecules2218-273X2024-02-0114328710.3390/biom14030287Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 ExperimentKui Wang0Gang Hu1Zhonghua Wu2Vladimir N. Uversky3Lukasz Kurgan4School of Statistics and Data Science, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, ChinaSchool of Statistics and Data Science, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, ChinaSchool of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, ChinaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, USF Health Byrd Alzheimer’s Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33613, USADepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USADisordered linkers (DLs) are intrinsically disordered regions that facilitate movement between adjacent functional regions/domains, contributing to many key cellular functions. The recently completed second Critical Assessments of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID2) experiment evaluated DL predictions by considering a rather narrow scenario when predicting 40 proteins that are already known to have DLs. We expand this evaluation by using a much larger set of nearly 350 test proteins from CAID2 and by investigating three distinct scenarios: (1) prediction residues in DLs vs. in non-DL regions (typical use of DL predictors); (2) prediction of residues in DLs vs. other disordered residues (to evaluate whether predictors can differentiate residues in DLs from other types of intrinsically disordered residues); and (3) prediction of proteins harboring DLs. We find that several methods provide relatively accurate predictions of DLs in the first scenario. However, only one method, APOD, accurately identifies DLs among other types of disordered residues (scenario 2) and predicts proteins harboring DLs (scenario 3). We also find that APOD’s predictive performance is modest, motivating further research into the development of new and more accurate DL predictors. We note that these efforts will benefit from a growing amount of training data and the availability of sophisticated deep network models and emphasize that future methods should provide accurate results across the three scenarios.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/14/3/287intrinsic disorderdisordered linkersprotein structureprotein functionpredictionassessment
spellingShingle Kui Wang
Gang Hu
Zhonghua Wu
Vladimir N. Uversky
Lukasz Kurgan
Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment
Biomolecules
intrinsic disorder
disordered linkers
protein structure
protein function
prediction
assessment
title Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment
title_full Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment
title_fullStr Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment
title_short Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment
title_sort assessment of disordered linker predictions in the caid2 experiment
topic intrinsic disorder
disordered linkers
protein structure
protein function
prediction
assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/14/3/287
work_keys_str_mv AT kuiwang assessmentofdisorderedlinkerpredictionsinthecaid2experiment
AT ganghu assessmentofdisorderedlinkerpredictionsinthecaid2experiment
AT zhonghuawu assessmentofdisorderedlinkerpredictionsinthecaid2experiment
AT vladimirnuversky assessmentofdisorderedlinkerpredictionsinthecaid2experiment
AT lukaszkurgan assessmentofdisorderedlinkerpredictionsinthecaid2experiment