Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity?
The product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue that, regardless of one’s chosen ontology of arguments, arguments are not the product of some process of arguing. Hence, appeal to the distinction is di...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Windsor
2011-07-01
|
| Series: | Informal Logic |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3098 |
| _version_ | 1819263721132785664 |
|---|---|
| author | Geoff Goddu |
| author_facet | Geoff Goddu |
| author_sort | Geoff Goddu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue that, regardless of one’s chosen ontology of arguments, arguments are not the product of some process of arguing. Hence, appeal to the distinction is distorting the very organizational foundations of argumentation theory and should be abandoned. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T20:18:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e65757a961404dfabc00ead75d35c3b2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0824-2577 2293-734X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T20:18:05Z |
| publishDate | 2011-07-01 |
| publisher | University of Windsor |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Informal Logic |
| spelling | doaj.art-e65757a961404dfabc00ead75d35c3b22022-12-21T17:32:38ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2011-07-0131210.22329/il.v31i2.3098Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity?Geoff GodduThe product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue that, regardless of one’s chosen ontology of arguments, arguments are not the product of some process of arguing. Hence, appeal to the distinction is distorting the very organizational foundations of argumentation theory and should be abandoned.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3098The product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue thatregardless of one’s chosen ontology of argumentsarguments are not the product of some process of arg |
| spellingShingle | Geoff Goddu Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity? Informal Logic The product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue that regardless of one’s chosen ontology of arguments arguments are not the product of some process of arg |
| title | Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity? |
| title_full | Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity? |
| title_fullStr | Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity? |
| title_short | Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity? |
| title_sort | is argument subject to the product process ambiguity |
| topic | The product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue that regardless of one’s chosen ontology of arguments arguments are not the product of some process of arg |
| url | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3098 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT geoffgoddu isargumentsubjecttotheproductprocessambiguity |