Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susanne G Pondorfer, Manuel Heinemann, Maximilian W M Wintergerst, Maximilian Pfau, Annika L Strömer, Frank G Holz, Robert P Finger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748
_version_ 1818677809289101312
author Susanne G Pondorfer
Manuel Heinemann
Maximilian W M Wintergerst
Maximilian Pfau
Annika L Strömer
Frank G Holz
Robert P Finger
author_facet Susanne G Pondorfer
Manuel Heinemann
Maximilian W M Wintergerst
Maximilian Pfau
Annika L Strömer
Frank G Holz
Robert P Finger
author_sort Susanne G Pondorfer
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), visual acuity (VA) measured with the Moorfields Vanishing Optotypes Acuity Charts (MAC), contrast sensitivity with the Pelli-Robson test, reading speed using the International Reading Speed texts (IReST) and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry (S-MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy). Groups were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and ROC analyses. Linear regression was used to control for confounding. Results showed that all visual function test performances except the IReST were significantly reduced in iAMD patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). These effects did not alter after controlling for age and sex. Best discrimination between iAMD and controls yield the combination of LLVA and contrast sensitivity as well as MAC-VA and contrast sensitivity (ROC area under the curve 0.95 and 0.93, respectively). Our results suggest that LLVA, MAC-VA, contrast sensitivity and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry can capture visual impairment characteristic for iAMD. Best discrimination against iAMD is achieved with a combination of two tests.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T09:05:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e65ba7efe7e24418a55a81ece130737d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T09:05:16Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-e65ba7efe7e24418a55a81ece130737d2022-12-21T21:55:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01154e023174810.1371/journal.pone.0231748Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.Susanne G PondorferManuel HeinemannMaximilian W M WintergerstMaximilian PfauAnnika L StrömerFrank G HolzRobert P FingerThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), visual acuity (VA) measured with the Moorfields Vanishing Optotypes Acuity Charts (MAC), contrast sensitivity with the Pelli-Robson test, reading speed using the International Reading Speed texts (IReST) and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry (S-MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy). Groups were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and ROC analyses. Linear regression was used to control for confounding. Results showed that all visual function test performances except the IReST were significantly reduced in iAMD patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). These effects did not alter after controlling for age and sex. Best discrimination between iAMD and controls yield the combination of LLVA and contrast sensitivity as well as MAC-VA and contrast sensitivity (ROC area under the curve 0.95 and 0.93, respectively). Our results suggest that LLVA, MAC-VA, contrast sensitivity and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry can capture visual impairment characteristic for iAMD. Best discrimination against iAMD is achieved with a combination of two tests.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748
spellingShingle Susanne G Pondorfer
Manuel Heinemann
Maximilian W M Wintergerst
Maximilian Pfau
Annika L Strömer
Frank G Holz
Robert P Finger
Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.
PLoS ONE
title Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.
title_full Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.
title_fullStr Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.
title_full_unstemmed Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.
title_short Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.
title_sort detecting vision loss in intermediate age related macular degeneration a comparison of visual function tests
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748
work_keys_str_mv AT susannegpondorfer detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT manuelheinemann detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT maximilianwmwintergerst detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT maximilianpfau detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT annikalstromer detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT frankgholz detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT robertpfinger detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests