The “living together” argument in the European Court of Human Rights case-law
This article analyses the three cases where the argument of “living together” was engaged by the ECtHR and accepted as a legal justification for the prohibition of the full-face veils (burqa and niqab): SAS v. France (2014), Belcacemi and Oussar v. Belgium (2017), and Dakir v. Belgium (2017). It ana...
Main Author: | Tania Pagotto |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://czasopisma.kul.pl/spw/article/view/257 |
Similar Items
-
Unveiling the “veil debate” in the Greek press
by: Chara Karagiannopoulou
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Review of the Monograph: Cohen-Almagor R. The Republic, Secularism and Security: France versus the Burqa and the Niqab. Cham: Springer, 2022. 66 p.
by: D. T. Karamanukyan
Published: (2023-01-01) -
“The new modern”: The subjective motivation for wearing a veil in a Muslim-majority city, Langsa, Aceh
by: Syiva Fitria, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Kopftuchverbot am Arbeitsplatz als Diskriminierung
by: Maximilian Steinbeis -
Les femmes en niqab en France
by: Agnès De Féo
Published: (2018-10-01)