The Appreciation Issue of Contemporary Artwork in View of Parnassian School and the Theory of Art for Art's Sake

There are many works of art that adopt the Bernasian school of thought that adopts the art theory of art, which in turn has cast a shadow over the problem of receiving contemporary artistic work. Receiving a plastic work of art reflects various forms of systematic thinking and visual understanding o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Akmal hamdi Ahmed Abdalla
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Arab Association for Islamic Civilization and Art 2023-05-01
Series:Journal of Architecture, Art & Humanistic Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mjaf.journals.ekb.eg/article_181531_53d5945f358e2be631c0415a50bac101.pdf
_version_ 1797836784231514112
author Akmal hamdi Ahmed Abdalla
author_facet Akmal hamdi Ahmed Abdalla
author_sort Akmal hamdi Ahmed Abdalla
collection DOAJ
description There are many works of art that adopt the Bernasian school of thought that adopts the art theory of art, which in turn has cast a shadow over the problem of receiving contemporary artistic work. Receiving a plastic work of art reflects various forms of systematic thinking and visual understanding of the artistic work as a direct response to the interaction between the recipient and the work of art on levels of aesthetic thinking. This, in turn, gives the artwork a direct impact on the recipient's senses and emotions. The artwork, with its sensory presence, is available in it through the total components of the artwork, which in its entirety constitute the subject of the work. However, art for art rejects all of the above and deals with the artwork in its formal form and rejects any kind of non-sensory contact between the recipient and the artwork, given their philosophy that the artwork should not bring on the recipient more than pleasure and pleasure, and it should not reflect A specific philosophy or thought that the artist adopts in the artwork.The art theory of art and the Bernasi school believes that the plastic work of art consists of a number of formal elements with a sensual significance, and that these elements should not go beyond being sensual and expand until they carry intellectual, philosophical or aesthetic contents that the artist transmits to the recipient within the framework of the experience of receiving the work of art. So that it may suggest to it the meaning behind the artistic work, and therefore the Bernasian doctrine and its adoption of the art theory of art is based mainly on the perceptual factor that in turn is based on the concept of the artistic aesthetic of the artwork and its role in dealing with the recipient of the artwork.While the research aims to uncover the philosophy of receiving the work of plastic art, and the theoretical problematic of the Bernasian doctrine in dealing with the recipient, while the problem of the research lies in the question about the possibilities of monitoring the problem of receiving the contemporary plastic art work in light of the theoretical data of the Bernasian school of thought anf The theory of Art for art's sake?
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:14:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e66343bef5d54353981abd2de2662be4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2356-9654
2357-0342
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:14:28Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Arab Association for Islamic Civilization and Art
record_format Article
series Journal of Architecture, Art & Humanistic Science
spelling doaj.art-e66343bef5d54353981abd2de2662be42023-04-30T06:26:32ZaraArab Association for Islamic Civilization and ArtJournal of Architecture, Art & Humanistic Science2356-96542357-03422023-05-0183928029210.21608/mjaf.2021.78767.2355181531The Appreciation Issue of Contemporary Artwork in View of Parnassian School and the Theory of Art for Art's SakeAkmal hamdi Ahmed Abdalla0Faculty of art education helwan universityThere are many works of art that adopt the Bernasian school of thought that adopts the art theory of art, which in turn has cast a shadow over the problem of receiving contemporary artistic work. Receiving a plastic work of art reflects various forms of systematic thinking and visual understanding of the artistic work as a direct response to the interaction between the recipient and the work of art on levels of aesthetic thinking. This, in turn, gives the artwork a direct impact on the recipient's senses and emotions. The artwork, with its sensory presence, is available in it through the total components of the artwork, which in its entirety constitute the subject of the work. However, art for art rejects all of the above and deals with the artwork in its formal form and rejects any kind of non-sensory contact between the recipient and the artwork, given their philosophy that the artwork should not bring on the recipient more than pleasure and pleasure, and it should not reflect A specific philosophy or thought that the artist adopts in the artwork.The art theory of art and the Bernasi school believes that the plastic work of art consists of a number of formal elements with a sensual significance, and that these elements should not go beyond being sensual and expand until they carry intellectual, philosophical or aesthetic contents that the artist transmits to the recipient within the framework of the experience of receiving the work of art. So that it may suggest to it the meaning behind the artistic work, and therefore the Bernasian doctrine and its adoption of the art theory of art is based mainly on the perceptual factor that in turn is based on the concept of the artistic aesthetic of the artwork and its role in dealing with the recipient of the artwork.While the research aims to uncover the philosophy of receiving the work of plastic art, and the theoretical problematic of the Bernasian doctrine in dealing with the recipient, while the problem of the research lies in the question about the possibilities of monitoring the problem of receiving the contemporary plastic art work in light of the theoretical data of the Bernasian school of thought anf The theory of Art for art's sake?https://mjaf.journals.ekb.eg/article_181531_53d5945f358e2be631c0415a50bac101.pdfappreciationcontemporary artworkparnassianart for art
spellingShingle Akmal hamdi Ahmed Abdalla
The Appreciation Issue of Contemporary Artwork in View of Parnassian School and the Theory of Art for Art's Sake
Journal of Architecture, Art & Humanistic Science
appreciation
contemporary artwork
parnassian
art for art
title The Appreciation Issue of Contemporary Artwork in View of Parnassian School and the Theory of Art for Art's Sake
title_full The Appreciation Issue of Contemporary Artwork in View of Parnassian School and the Theory of Art for Art's Sake
title_fullStr The Appreciation Issue of Contemporary Artwork in View of Parnassian School and the Theory of Art for Art's Sake
title_full_unstemmed The Appreciation Issue of Contemporary Artwork in View of Parnassian School and the Theory of Art for Art's Sake
title_short The Appreciation Issue of Contemporary Artwork in View of Parnassian School and the Theory of Art for Art's Sake
title_sort appreciation issue of contemporary artwork in view of parnassian school and the theory of art for art s sake
topic appreciation
contemporary artwork
parnassian
art for art
url https://mjaf.journals.ekb.eg/article_181531_53d5945f358e2be631c0415a50bac101.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT akmalhamdiahmedabdalla theappreciationissueofcontemporaryartworkinviewofparnassianschoolandthetheoryofartforartssake
AT akmalhamdiahmedabdalla appreciationissueofcontemporaryartworkinviewofparnassianschoolandthetheoryofartforartssake