Professionalism in dentistry: deconstructing common terminology

Abstract Background There is a social expectation that dentists demonstrate professionalism. Although the General Dental Council puts it at the heart of their regulatory agenda, there is not yet consensus on the meaning and implications of the term. Objective To explore practising dentists’ understa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Trathen, Sasha Scambler, Jennifer E. Gallagher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2022-07-01
Series:BDJ Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00105-9
_version_ 1818193001616244736
author Andrew Trathen
Sasha Scambler
Jennifer E. Gallagher
author_facet Andrew Trathen
Sasha Scambler
Jennifer E. Gallagher
author_sort Andrew Trathen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There is a social expectation that dentists demonstrate professionalism. Although the General Dental Council puts it at the heart of their regulatory agenda, there is not yet consensus on the meaning and implications of the term. Objective To explore practising dentists’ understanding of the character traits commonly associated with professionalism and what these mean in practice. Method Constructivist grounded theory was employed throughout this study. Qualitative, in-depth interviews were conducted with dental professionals in England recruited through theoretical sampling to saturation point. Interviews used a topic guide informed by the literature, and analysis was conducted through constant comparison during data collection. Results The study found that traits commonly associated with professionalism in the literature were difficult for dentists to define clearly or operationalise in a clinical setting. There was disagreement over how some traits should be understood, and it was unclear to participants how, or indeed if, the listed traits were directly relevant to practice in their current form. Conclusion Rather than expecting unconditional adherence to an externally imposed definition, further exploration is required to understand how health professionals make sense of professionalism by reference to their lived experiences and worldviews. In Brief Institutional expectations of professionalism, defined through character traits and behaviours, do not appear to map neatly on to the experiences of dental professionals. Straightforward, apparently uncontroversial terms elicited a wide range of responses, including disagreement. This brought in to question whether achieving consensus is possible. Analysing how our respondents understood the terms by reference to the meanings they constructed from lived experience offers deeper insights.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:39:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6651298ea394cc7b8ab0ca2258862da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-807X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:39:27Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BDJ Open
spelling doaj.art-e6651298ea394cc7b8ab0ca2258862da2022-12-22T00:44:18ZengNature Publishing GroupBDJ Open2056-807X2022-07-01811610.1038/s41405-022-00105-9Professionalism in dentistry: deconstructing common terminologyAndrew Trathen0Sasha Scambler1Jennifer E. Gallagher2Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King’s College LondonFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King’s College LondonFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King’s College LondonAbstract Background There is a social expectation that dentists demonstrate professionalism. Although the General Dental Council puts it at the heart of their regulatory agenda, there is not yet consensus on the meaning and implications of the term. Objective To explore practising dentists’ understanding of the character traits commonly associated with professionalism and what these mean in practice. Method Constructivist grounded theory was employed throughout this study. Qualitative, in-depth interviews were conducted with dental professionals in England recruited through theoretical sampling to saturation point. Interviews used a topic guide informed by the literature, and analysis was conducted through constant comparison during data collection. Results The study found that traits commonly associated with professionalism in the literature were difficult for dentists to define clearly or operationalise in a clinical setting. There was disagreement over how some traits should be understood, and it was unclear to participants how, or indeed if, the listed traits were directly relevant to practice in their current form. Conclusion Rather than expecting unconditional adherence to an externally imposed definition, further exploration is required to understand how health professionals make sense of professionalism by reference to their lived experiences and worldviews. In Brief Institutional expectations of professionalism, defined through character traits and behaviours, do not appear to map neatly on to the experiences of dental professionals. Straightforward, apparently uncontroversial terms elicited a wide range of responses, including disagreement. This brought in to question whether achieving consensus is possible. Analysing how our respondents understood the terms by reference to the meanings they constructed from lived experience offers deeper insights.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00105-9
spellingShingle Andrew Trathen
Sasha Scambler
Jennifer E. Gallagher
Professionalism in dentistry: deconstructing common terminology
BDJ Open
title Professionalism in dentistry: deconstructing common terminology
title_full Professionalism in dentistry: deconstructing common terminology
title_fullStr Professionalism in dentistry: deconstructing common terminology
title_full_unstemmed Professionalism in dentistry: deconstructing common terminology
title_short Professionalism in dentistry: deconstructing common terminology
title_sort professionalism in dentistry deconstructing common terminology
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00105-9
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewtrathen professionalismindentistrydeconstructingcommonterminology
AT sashascambler professionalismindentistrydeconstructingcommonterminology
AT jenniferegallagher professionalismindentistrydeconstructingcommonterminology