How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study

BackgroundPrior studies have demonstrated that the e-cigarette market contains a large number of brands. Identifying these existing e-cigarette brands is a key element of market surveillance, which will further assist in policy making and compliance checks. Object...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaoying Ma, Aadeeba Kaareen, Hojin Park, Yanyun He, Shuning Jiang, Zefeng Qiu, Zidian Xie, Dongmei Li, Jian Chen, Richard J O’Connor, Geoffrey T Fong, Ce Shang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2024-02-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2024/1/e47570
_version_ 1797292581740085248
author Shaoying Ma
Aadeeba Kaareen
Hojin Park
Yanyun He
Shuning Jiang
Zefeng Qiu
Zidian Xie
Dongmei Li
Jian Chen
Richard J O’Connor
Geoffrey T Fong
Ce Shang
author_facet Shaoying Ma
Aadeeba Kaareen
Hojin Park
Yanyun He
Shuning Jiang
Zefeng Qiu
Zidian Xie
Dongmei Li
Jian Chen
Richard J O’Connor
Geoffrey T Fong
Ce Shang
author_sort Shaoying Ma
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPrior studies have demonstrated that the e-cigarette market contains a large number of brands. Identifying these existing e-cigarette brands is a key element of market surveillance, which will further assist in policy making and compliance checks. ObjectiveTo facilitate the surveillance of the diverse product landscape in the e-cigarette market, we constructed a semantic database of e-cigarette brands that have appeared in the US market as of 2020-2022. MethodsIn order to build the brand database, we searched and compiled e-cigarette brands from a comprehensive list of retail channels and sources, including (1) e-liquid and disposable brands sold in web-based stores, (2) e-cigarette brands sold in brick-and-mortar stores and collected by the Nielsen Retail Scanner Data, (3) e-cigarette brands compiled by Wikipedia, (4) self-reported e-cigarette brands from the 2020 International Tobacco Control Four-Country Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) US survey, and (5) e-cigarette brands on Twitter. We also estimated the top 5 e-cigarette brands by sales volume in brick-and-mortar stores, by the frequency and variety of offerings in web-based shops, and by the frequency of self-reported brands from the 2020 ITC 4CV US survey. ResultsAs of 2020-2022, a total of 912 e-cigarette brands have been sold by various retail channels. During 2020-2022, the top 5 brands are JUUL, vuse, njoy, blu, and logic in brick-and-mortar stores; blu, king, monster, twist, and air factory for e-liquids in web-based stores; hyde, pod mesh, suorin, vaporlax, and xtra for disposables sold in web-based stores; and smok, aspire, vaporesso, innokin, and eleaf based on self-reported survey data. ConclusionsAs the US Food and Drug Administration enforces the premarket tobacco market authorization, many e-cigarette brands may become illegal in the US market. In this context, how e-cigarette brands evolve and consolidate in different retail channels will be critical for understanding the regulatory impacts on product availability. Our semantic database of e-cigarette brands can serve as a useful tool to monitor product and marketplace development, conduct compliance checks, assess manufacturers’ marketing behaviors, and identify regulatory impacts.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T19:58:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e671512f12dd429fbb837d4da357d2b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-326X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T19:58:32Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Formative Research
spelling doaj.art-e671512f12dd429fbb837d4da357d2b12024-02-28T14:00:31ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2024-02-018e4757010.2196/47570How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability StudyShaoying Mahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-0622Aadeeba Kaareenhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-3999-0294Hojin Parkhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5581-6427Yanyun Hehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-6102Shuning Jianghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-2818Zefeng Qiuhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-8451-8001Zidian Xiehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5149-7710Dongmei Lihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-2483Jian Chenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1599-0831Richard J O’Connorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-182XGeoffrey T Fonghttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9098-6472Ce Shanghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8838-4250 BackgroundPrior studies have demonstrated that the e-cigarette market contains a large number of brands. Identifying these existing e-cigarette brands is a key element of market surveillance, which will further assist in policy making and compliance checks. ObjectiveTo facilitate the surveillance of the diverse product landscape in the e-cigarette market, we constructed a semantic database of e-cigarette brands that have appeared in the US market as of 2020-2022. MethodsIn order to build the brand database, we searched and compiled e-cigarette brands from a comprehensive list of retail channels and sources, including (1) e-liquid and disposable brands sold in web-based stores, (2) e-cigarette brands sold in brick-and-mortar stores and collected by the Nielsen Retail Scanner Data, (3) e-cigarette brands compiled by Wikipedia, (4) self-reported e-cigarette brands from the 2020 International Tobacco Control Four-Country Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) US survey, and (5) e-cigarette brands on Twitter. We also estimated the top 5 e-cigarette brands by sales volume in brick-and-mortar stores, by the frequency and variety of offerings in web-based shops, and by the frequency of self-reported brands from the 2020 ITC 4CV US survey. ResultsAs of 2020-2022, a total of 912 e-cigarette brands have been sold by various retail channels. During 2020-2022, the top 5 brands are JUUL, vuse, njoy, blu, and logic in brick-and-mortar stores; blu, king, monster, twist, and air factory for e-liquids in web-based stores; hyde, pod mesh, suorin, vaporlax, and xtra for disposables sold in web-based stores; and smok, aspire, vaporesso, innokin, and eleaf based on self-reported survey data. ConclusionsAs the US Food and Drug Administration enforces the premarket tobacco market authorization, many e-cigarette brands may become illegal in the US market. In this context, how e-cigarette brands evolve and consolidate in different retail channels will be critical for understanding the regulatory impacts on product availability. Our semantic database of e-cigarette brands can serve as a useful tool to monitor product and marketplace development, conduct compliance checks, assess manufacturers’ marketing behaviors, and identify regulatory impacts.https://formative.jmir.org/2024/1/e47570
spellingShingle Shaoying Ma
Aadeeba Kaareen
Hojin Park
Yanyun He
Shuning Jiang
Zefeng Qiu
Zidian Xie
Dongmei Li
Jian Chen
Richard J O’Connor
Geoffrey T Fong
Ce Shang
How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study
JMIR Formative Research
title How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study
title_full How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study
title_fullStr How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study
title_full_unstemmed How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study
title_short How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study
title_sort how to identify e cigarette brands available in the united states during 2020 2022 development and usability study
url https://formative.jmir.org/2024/1/e47570
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoyingma howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT aadeebakaareen howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT hojinpark howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT yanyunhe howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT shuningjiang howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT zefengqiu howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT zidianxie howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT dongmeili howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT jianchen howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT richardjoconnor howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT geoffreytfong howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy
AT ceshang howtoidentifyecigarettebrandsavailableintheunitedstatesduring20202022developmentandusabilitystudy