Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale

Abstract Background Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is more likely to occur in young women. The aim of this study was to compare the aesthetic effect of different thyroidectomies. Methods One hundred twenty female patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evenly distributed into three groups: conventional ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao Ma, Qi-jun Xia, Guojun Li, Tian-xiao Wang, Qin Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-09-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-017-3645-2
_version_ 1819073482488545280
author Xiao Ma
Qi-jun Xia
Guojun Li
Tian-xiao Wang
Qin Li
author_facet Xiao Ma
Qi-jun Xia
Guojun Li
Tian-xiao Wang
Qin Li
author_sort Xiao Ma
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is more likely to occur in young women. The aim of this study was to compare the aesthetic effect of different thyroidectomies. Methods One hundred twenty female patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evenly distributed into three groups: conventional access (CA), aesthetic principles access (APA) and minimally invasive access (MIA). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used as the assessment tool for the linear scar. Results The patients in the MIA group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less drainage, a shorter scar length and a shorter duration of drainage than those in the CA group and the APA group. However, the operation time of 129.0 min in the MIA group was significantly longer than the 79.6 min in the CA group and the 77.0 min in the APA group. The best aesthetic score, as assessed by the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), was obtained in the APA group. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) scores were significantly lower in the APA group and CA group than in the MIA group. Significantly lower objective scar ratings were found in the APA group than in the other two groups. Conclusion These results show that APA produced the best surgical outcomes in TC patients, indicating that conventional thyroidectomy can produce an ideal aesthetic result using the principles of aesthetic surgery. Thyroid surgery need not be performed through excessively short incisions for the sake of patient satisfaction with the scar’s appearance. Trial registration This clinical trial was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS on August 1st,2017 ( NCT03239769 ).
first_indexed 2024-12-21T17:54:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6870c98d93d4a39b9261b9d61185d55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T17:54:19Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-e6870c98d93d4a39b9261b9d61185d552022-12-21T18:55:15ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072017-09-011711810.1186/s12885-017-3645-2Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scaleXiao Ma0Qi-jun Xia1Guojun Li2Tian-xiao Wang3Qin Li4Department of Head and Neck, Perking University Cancer Hospital and InstituteDepartment of General Surgery, PLA Rocket General HospitalDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterDepartment of Head and Neck, Perking University Cancer Hospital and InstituteDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityAbstract Background Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is more likely to occur in young women. The aim of this study was to compare the aesthetic effect of different thyroidectomies. Methods One hundred twenty female patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evenly distributed into three groups: conventional access (CA), aesthetic principles access (APA) and minimally invasive access (MIA). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used as the assessment tool for the linear scar. Results The patients in the MIA group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less drainage, a shorter scar length and a shorter duration of drainage than those in the CA group and the APA group. However, the operation time of 129.0 min in the MIA group was significantly longer than the 79.6 min in the CA group and the 77.0 min in the APA group. The best aesthetic score, as assessed by the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), was obtained in the APA group. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) scores were significantly lower in the APA group and CA group than in the MIA group. Significantly lower objective scar ratings were found in the APA group than in the other two groups. Conclusion These results show that APA produced the best surgical outcomes in TC patients, indicating that conventional thyroidectomy can produce an ideal aesthetic result using the principles of aesthetic surgery. Thyroid surgery need not be performed through excessively short incisions for the sake of patient satisfaction with the scar’s appearance. Trial registration This clinical trial was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS on August 1st,2017 ( NCT03239769 ).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-017-3645-2Thyroid surgeryThyroidectomyMinimally invasive accessAesthetic principlePOSAS
spellingShingle Xiao Ma
Qi-jun Xia
Guojun Li
Tian-xiao Wang
Qin Li
Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale
BMC Cancer
Thyroid surgery
Thyroidectomy
Minimally invasive access
Aesthetic principle
POSAS
title Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale
title_full Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale
title_fullStr Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale
title_full_unstemmed Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale
title_short Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale
title_sort aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale
topic Thyroid surgery
Thyroidectomy
Minimally invasive access
Aesthetic principle
POSAS
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-017-3645-2
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoma aestheticprinciplesaccessthyroidectomyproducesthebestcosmeticoutcomesasassessedusingthepatientandobserverscarassessmentscale
AT qijunxia aestheticprinciplesaccessthyroidectomyproducesthebestcosmeticoutcomesasassessedusingthepatientandobserverscarassessmentscale
AT guojunli aestheticprinciplesaccessthyroidectomyproducesthebestcosmeticoutcomesasassessedusingthepatientandobserverscarassessmentscale
AT tianxiaowang aestheticprinciplesaccessthyroidectomyproducesthebestcosmeticoutcomesasassessedusingthepatientandobserverscarassessmentscale
AT qinli aestheticprinciplesaccessthyroidectomyproducesthebestcosmeticoutcomesasassessedusingthepatientandobserverscarassessmentscale