Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance. The case of EU Baltic fisheries

This article aims at contributing to governance conceptualization and its application to case study analyses. Two of the challenges which the theoretical and empirical work in the article addresses concern the facilitation of comparability of diverse governance cases and a specification of several k...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tom R. Burns, Christian Stöhr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) 2011-09-01
Series:International Journal of the Commons
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/260
_version_ 1818999656668987392
author Tom R. Burns
Christian Stöhr
author_facet Tom R. Burns
Christian Stöhr
author_sort Tom R. Burns
collection DOAJ
description This article aims at contributing to governance conceptualization and its application to case study analyses. Two of the challenges which the theoretical and empirical work in the article addresses concern the facilitation of comparability of diverse governance cases and a specification of several key mechanisms of governance formation and reform. A proposed model of the 'architecture of governance systems' – their major components and inter-linkages – contributes, as argued and illustrated here, to greater comparability among cases and with the possibility of improved accumulation of knowledge about governance systems. These tools are applied to empirical cases of governance structure and their functioning and reformation. Baltic fisheries, a complex, multi-level case of commons governance, is considered in some detail in order to illustrate and elaborate the key factors of power, knowledge, and conflict in the functioning and transformation of governance systems. In addition to the Baltic fisheries case, we consider briefly for comparative purposes chemicals and gender relations as additional areas of EU governance. The paper is divided into four sections. Section I introduces the basic conceptualization and tools of analysis. Section II presents the case of Baltic fisheries. Section III elaborates the key concepts and tools presented in Section I, in particular considering additional cases of the functioning of governance systems. Section IV is a brief conclusion.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T22:20:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e688f95da4b44c5a9da668ca7eff06ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1875-0281
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T22:20:54Z
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
record_format Article
series International Journal of the Commons
spelling doaj.art-e688f95da4b44c5a9da668ca7eff06ce2022-12-21T19:24:57ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812011-09-015223325810.18352/ijc.260137Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance. The case of EU Baltic fisheriesTom R. Burns0Christian Stöhr1University of UppsalaChalmers University of TechnologyThis article aims at contributing to governance conceptualization and its application to case study analyses. Two of the challenges which the theoretical and empirical work in the article addresses concern the facilitation of comparability of diverse governance cases and a specification of several key mechanisms of governance formation and reform. A proposed model of the 'architecture of governance systems' – their major components and inter-linkages – contributes, as argued and illustrated here, to greater comparability among cases and with the possibility of improved accumulation of knowledge about governance systems. These tools are applied to empirical cases of governance structure and their functioning and reformation. Baltic fisheries, a complex, multi-level case of commons governance, is considered in some detail in order to illustrate and elaborate the key factors of power, knowledge, and conflict in the functioning and transformation of governance systems. In addition to the Baltic fisheries case, we consider briefly for comparative purposes chemicals and gender relations as additional areas of EU governance. The paper is divided into four sections. Section I introduces the basic conceptualization and tools of analysis. Section II presents the case of Baltic fisheries. Section III elaborates the key concepts and tools presented in Section I, in particular considering additional cases of the functioning of governance systems. Section IV is a brief conclusion.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/260baltic fisheriescommonsconflictgovernancegovernance architectureknowledgepower
spellingShingle Tom R. Burns
Christian Stöhr
Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance. The case of EU Baltic fisheries
International Journal of the Commons
baltic fisheries
commons
conflict
governance
governance architecture
knowledge
power
title Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance. The case of EU Baltic fisheries
title_full Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance. The case of EU Baltic fisheries
title_fullStr Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance. The case of EU Baltic fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance. The case of EU Baltic fisheries
title_short Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance. The case of EU Baltic fisheries
title_sort power knowledge and conflict in the shaping of commons governance the case of eu baltic fisheries
topic baltic fisheries
commons
conflict
governance
governance architecture
knowledge
power
url https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/260
work_keys_str_mv AT tomrburns powerknowledgeandconflictintheshapingofcommonsgovernancethecaseofeubalticfisheries
AT christianstohr powerknowledgeandconflictintheshapingofcommonsgovernancethecaseofeubalticfisheries