To fund or not to fund?

Funding agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Shailes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2017-09-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/32015
_version_ 1811252970368532480
author Sarah Shailes
author_facet Sarah Shailes
author_sort Sarah Shailes
collection DOAJ
description Funding agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:42:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e694d486c8dc4227b22caf2098497168
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:42:45Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-e694d486c8dc4227b22caf20984971682022-12-22T03:24:42ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2017-09-01610.7554/eLife.32015To fund or not to fund?Sarah Shailes0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0399-9588eLife, Cambridge, United KingdomFunding agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.https://elifesciences.org/articles/32015peer reviewfunding agenciesbiasscience policy
spellingShingle Sarah Shailes
To fund or not to fund?
eLife
peer review
funding agencies
bias
science policy
title To fund or not to fund?
title_full To fund or not to fund?
title_fullStr To fund or not to fund?
title_full_unstemmed To fund or not to fund?
title_short To fund or not to fund?
title_sort to fund or not to fund
topic peer review
funding agencies
bias
science policy
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/32015
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahshailes tofundornottofund