A Comparative Analysis of the Tribological Behavior of Hard Layers Obtained by Three Different Hardened-Surface Processes on the Surface of AISI 4140 Steel

This work compares the tribological behavior of surface layers obtained by three different hardening processes. The layers were formed on the surface of AISI 4140 steel by applying three different thermochemical treatments. Wear resistance was evaluated using a standardized tribological machine for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pablo Alfredo Ruiz-Trabolsi, Alexis Chino-Ulloa, José Guadalupe Miranda-Hernández, Raúl Tadeo-Rosas, Rafael Carrera-Espinoza, Julio César Velázquez, Enrique Hernández-Sánchez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Crystals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/12/2/298
_version_ 1797481450042294272
author Pablo Alfredo Ruiz-Trabolsi
Alexis Chino-Ulloa
José Guadalupe Miranda-Hernández
Raúl Tadeo-Rosas
Rafael Carrera-Espinoza
Julio César Velázquez
Enrique Hernández-Sánchez
author_facet Pablo Alfredo Ruiz-Trabolsi
Alexis Chino-Ulloa
José Guadalupe Miranda-Hernández
Raúl Tadeo-Rosas
Rafael Carrera-Espinoza
Julio César Velázquez
Enrique Hernández-Sánchez
author_sort Pablo Alfredo Ruiz-Trabolsi
collection DOAJ
description This work compares the tribological behavior of surface layers obtained by three different hardening processes. The layers were formed on the surface of AISI 4140 steel by applying three different thermochemical treatments. Wear resistance was evaluated using a standardized tribological machine for abrasive wear, according to the limits established by the ASTM G65 “Standard Test Method for Measuring Abrasion Using Dry Sand/Rubber Wheel Apparatus”. According to the results, the boride layers exhibited the highest wear resistance, as compared to nitrided and carburized layers. In contrast, the carburized layers presented the highest loss of volume. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the worn surfaces to examine the wear mechanisms. Abrasive wear was identified in all the samples, as the main abrasive wear mechanism. The mean values of the coefficient of friction (CoF) of the hardened surfaces were 0.39, 0.55, and 0.65 for carburizing, nitriding, and boriding samples, respectively, indicating that the wear process may not always be related to a low CoF. The results suggest that the highest hardness is normally associated with high wear resistance, but the coefficient of friction could be not directly related to the hardness of the materials. Finally, a statistical study demonstrates the random nature of the layers obtained by three different hardening processes.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:14:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e698b0c7e07646ffa64a58610cbaec9a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4352
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:14:46Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Crystals
spelling doaj.art-e698b0c7e07646ffa64a58610cbaec9a2023-11-23T19:26:16ZengMDPI AGCrystals2073-43522022-02-0112229810.3390/cryst12020298A Comparative Analysis of the Tribological Behavior of Hard Layers Obtained by Three Different Hardened-Surface Processes on the Surface of AISI 4140 SteelPablo Alfredo Ruiz-Trabolsi0Alexis Chino-Ulloa1José Guadalupe Miranda-Hernández2Raúl Tadeo-Rosas3Rafael Carrera-Espinoza4Julio César Velázquez5Enrique Hernández-Sánchez6Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Biotecnología, Departamento de Bioingeniería, Avenida Acueducto s/n Barrio la Laguna Ticomán, México City 07340, MexicoInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Biotecnología, Departamento de Bioingeniería, Avenida Acueducto s/n Barrio la Laguna Ticomán, México City 07340, MexicoCentro Universitario UAEM Valle de México, Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Materiales Industriales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Atizapán de Zaragoza 54500, MexicoFacultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Unidad Torreón, Carretera Torreón-Matamoros, km 7.5, Ciudad Universitaria, Ejido el Águila, Torreón Coahuila 27276, MexicoDepartamento de Ingeniería Industrial y Mecánica, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Ex hacienda Santa Catarina Mártir, San Andrés Cholula Puebla 72810, MexicoInstituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIQIE, Departamento de Ingeniería Química Industrial, UPALM Edificio 7, Zacatenco, México City 07738, MexicoInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Biotecnología, Departamento de Bioingeniería, Avenida Acueducto s/n Barrio la Laguna Ticomán, México City 07340, MexicoThis work compares the tribological behavior of surface layers obtained by three different hardening processes. The layers were formed on the surface of AISI 4140 steel by applying three different thermochemical treatments. Wear resistance was evaluated using a standardized tribological machine for abrasive wear, according to the limits established by the ASTM G65 “Standard Test Method for Measuring Abrasion Using Dry Sand/Rubber Wheel Apparatus”. According to the results, the boride layers exhibited the highest wear resistance, as compared to nitrided and carburized layers. In contrast, the carburized layers presented the highest loss of volume. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the worn surfaces to examine the wear mechanisms. Abrasive wear was identified in all the samples, as the main abrasive wear mechanism. The mean values of the coefficient of friction (CoF) of the hardened surfaces were 0.39, 0.55, and 0.65 for carburizing, nitriding, and boriding samples, respectively, indicating that the wear process may not always be related to a low CoF. The results suggest that the highest hardness is normally associated with high wear resistance, but the coefficient of friction could be not directly related to the hardness of the materials. Finally, a statistical study demonstrates the random nature of the layers obtained by three different hardening processes.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/12/2/298abrasive weardiffusion processeshard layersboridingnitridingcarburizing
spellingShingle Pablo Alfredo Ruiz-Trabolsi
Alexis Chino-Ulloa
José Guadalupe Miranda-Hernández
Raúl Tadeo-Rosas
Rafael Carrera-Espinoza
Julio César Velázquez
Enrique Hernández-Sánchez
A Comparative Analysis of the Tribological Behavior of Hard Layers Obtained by Three Different Hardened-Surface Processes on the Surface of AISI 4140 Steel
Crystals
abrasive wear
diffusion processes
hard layers
boriding
nitriding
carburizing
title A Comparative Analysis of the Tribological Behavior of Hard Layers Obtained by Three Different Hardened-Surface Processes on the Surface of AISI 4140 Steel
title_full A Comparative Analysis of the Tribological Behavior of Hard Layers Obtained by Three Different Hardened-Surface Processes on the Surface of AISI 4140 Steel
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of the Tribological Behavior of Hard Layers Obtained by Three Different Hardened-Surface Processes on the Surface of AISI 4140 Steel
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of the Tribological Behavior of Hard Layers Obtained by Three Different Hardened-Surface Processes on the Surface of AISI 4140 Steel
title_short A Comparative Analysis of the Tribological Behavior of Hard Layers Obtained by Three Different Hardened-Surface Processes on the Surface of AISI 4140 Steel
title_sort comparative analysis of the tribological behavior of hard layers obtained by three different hardened surface processes on the surface of aisi 4140 steel
topic abrasive wear
diffusion processes
hard layers
boriding
nitriding
carburizing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/12/2/298
work_keys_str_mv AT pabloalfredoruiztrabolsi acomparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT alexischinoulloa acomparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT joseguadalupemirandahernandez acomparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT raultadeorosas acomparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT rafaelcarreraespinoza acomparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT juliocesarvelazquez acomparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT enriquehernandezsanchez acomparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT pabloalfredoruiztrabolsi comparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT alexischinoulloa comparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT joseguadalupemirandahernandez comparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT raultadeorosas comparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT rafaelcarreraespinoza comparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT juliocesarvelazquez comparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel
AT enriquehernandezsanchez comparativeanalysisofthetribologicalbehaviorofhardlayersobtainedbythreedifferenthardenedsurfaceprocessesonthesurfaceofaisi4140steel