Evaluation of System Identification Methods for Free Vibration Flutter Derivatives of Long-Span Bridges

The significance of long-span bridges being susceptible to wind-induced vibrations and the need for evaluating their aerodynamic performance is the focus of this study. The main emphasis is on experimental methods for assessing the bridges’ aerodynamic stability, using sectional model tests with the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Saqlain Awan, Ali Javed, Muhammad Faheem Ud Din Afzal, Luis Federico Navarro Vilchez, Armin Mehrabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/8/4672
Description
Summary:The significance of long-span bridges being susceptible to wind-induced vibrations and the need for evaluating their aerodynamic performance is the focus of this study. The main emphasis is on experimental methods for assessing the bridges’ aerodynamic stability, using sectional model tests with the free vibration technique. The dynamic properties of the model are determined from the measured response, using various system identification methods, including the modified Ibrahim time domain (MITD) and iterative least squares (ILS) for two-degree-of-freedom systems and the logarithmic decrement method (LDM) and the Hilbert transform method (HTM) for single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. A new dynamic testing setup was designed to facilitate single-degree-of-freedom (heave and pitch) and coupled two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) motion in a wind tunnel section model. The vertical and torsional stiffnesses of the model were adjusted with elastic springs. A Great Belt Bridge section model was selected for testing due to its streamlined aerodynamic shape. The direct and crossflow derivatives were extracted from the measured response using the system identification methods mentioned. Additionally, analytical studies and numerical computational fluid dynamics simulations were conducted to validate the experimental results. The study found that HTM is most effective in SDOF due to its ability to extract both damping and frequency from the nonlinear response, whereas the MITD method is faster in converging system parameters in 2DOF system tests. The experimental and numerical results are comparable to the flat plate, which confirms the streamlined behavior of the Great Belt section from an aerodynamic perspective.
ISSN:2076-3417