Compositional Differences Among Types of Mechanically Separated Chicken and Their Influence on Physicochemical Attributes of Frankfurter-Type Sausages

Mechanically separated chicken (MSC) from 2 different separation methods (MSC1, Beehive separator, aged bones [Provisur Technologies, Mokena, IL]; MSC2, Poss separator, fresh bones [Poss Design Limited, Oakville, Ontario, Canada]) and chicken breast trim (CBT) were used as raw materials in frankfurt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danika K. Miller, Joseph G. Sebranek, Laura E. Yoder, Rodrigo Tarté, Steven M. Lonergan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iowa State University Digital Press 2021-08-01
Series:Meat and Muscle Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/mmb/article/id/12294/
_version_ 1797222211518464000
author Danika K. Miller
Joseph G. Sebranek
Laura E. Yoder
Rodrigo Tarté
Steven M. Lonergan
author_facet Danika K. Miller
Joseph G. Sebranek
Laura E. Yoder
Rodrigo Tarté
Steven M. Lonergan
author_sort Danika K. Miller
collection DOAJ
description Mechanically separated chicken (MSC) from 2 different separation methods (MSC1, Beehive separator, aged bones [Provisur Technologies, Mokena, IL]; MSC2, Poss separator, fresh bones [Poss Design Limited, Oakville, Ontario, Canada]) and chicken breast trim (CBT) were used as raw materials in frankfurters. Texture, color, and lipid oxidation were measured over a refrigerated storage period of 98 d. Both MSC were higher in fat and lower in moisture than CBT. MSC frankfurters had lower L* and higher a* values than CBT frankfurters, with MSC2 frankfurters having the lowest L* and highest a* (P < 0.05). Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances values were higher in MSC1 frankfurters (P < 0.05) than in CBT and MSC2 frankfurters. Texture Profile Analysis hardness, cohesiveness, resilience, and chewiness were highest in MSC2 frankfurters. Differences among MSC resulted in detectable differences in finished product attributes, with MSC2 frankfurters being darker and redder and having lower levels of lipid oxidation than MSC1 frankfurters, underscoring the importance of understanding the specific functional attributes of MSC obtained by different processes prior to product formulation and manufacturing.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:17:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6a5322207d64f90b7ad1c8a2c6fa34b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2575-985X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:17:43Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Iowa State University Digital Press
record_format Article
series Meat and Muscle Biology
spelling doaj.art-e6a5322207d64f90b7ad1c8a2c6fa34b2024-04-04T17:28:49ZengIowa State University Digital PressMeat and Muscle Biology2575-985X2021-08-015110.22175/mmb.12294Compositional Differences Among Types of Mechanically Separated Chicken and Their Influence on Physicochemical Attributes of Frankfurter-Type SausagesDanika K. Miller0Joseph G. Sebranek1Laura E. Yoder2Rodrigo Tarté3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5329-7827Steven M. Lonergan4Department of Animal Science, Iowa State UniversityIowa State UniversityDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State UniversityDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State UniversityIowa State UniversityMechanically separated chicken (MSC) from 2 different separation methods (MSC1, Beehive separator, aged bones [Provisur Technologies, Mokena, IL]; MSC2, Poss separator, fresh bones [Poss Design Limited, Oakville, Ontario, Canada]) and chicken breast trim (CBT) were used as raw materials in frankfurters. Texture, color, and lipid oxidation were measured over a refrigerated storage period of 98 d. Both MSC were higher in fat and lower in moisture than CBT. MSC frankfurters had lower L* and higher a* values than CBT frankfurters, with MSC2 frankfurters having the lowest L* and highest a* (P < 0.05). Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances values were higher in MSC1 frankfurters (P < 0.05) than in CBT and MSC2 frankfurters. Texture Profile Analysis hardness, cohesiveness, resilience, and chewiness were highest in MSC2 frankfurters. Differences among MSC resulted in detectable differences in finished product attributes, with MSC2 frankfurters being darker and redder and having lower levels of lipid oxidation than MSC1 frankfurters, underscoring the importance of understanding the specific functional attributes of MSC obtained by different processes prior to product formulation and manufacturing.https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/mmb/article/id/12294/mechanically separated chickenmechanically separated poultryfrankfurterssausage
spellingShingle Danika K. Miller
Joseph G. Sebranek
Laura E. Yoder
Rodrigo Tarté
Steven M. Lonergan
Compositional Differences Among Types of Mechanically Separated Chicken and Their Influence on Physicochemical Attributes of Frankfurter-Type Sausages
Meat and Muscle Biology
mechanically separated chicken
mechanically separated poultry
frankfurters
sausage
title Compositional Differences Among Types of Mechanically Separated Chicken and Their Influence on Physicochemical Attributes of Frankfurter-Type Sausages
title_full Compositional Differences Among Types of Mechanically Separated Chicken and Their Influence on Physicochemical Attributes of Frankfurter-Type Sausages
title_fullStr Compositional Differences Among Types of Mechanically Separated Chicken and Their Influence on Physicochemical Attributes of Frankfurter-Type Sausages
title_full_unstemmed Compositional Differences Among Types of Mechanically Separated Chicken and Their Influence on Physicochemical Attributes of Frankfurter-Type Sausages
title_short Compositional Differences Among Types of Mechanically Separated Chicken and Their Influence on Physicochemical Attributes of Frankfurter-Type Sausages
title_sort compositional differences among types of mechanically separated chicken and their influence on physicochemical attributes of frankfurter type sausages
topic mechanically separated chicken
mechanically separated poultry
frankfurters
sausage
url https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/mmb/article/id/12294/
work_keys_str_mv AT danikakmiller compositionaldifferencesamongtypesofmechanicallyseparatedchickenandtheirinfluenceonphysicochemicalattributesoffrankfurtertypesausages
AT josephgsebranek compositionaldifferencesamongtypesofmechanicallyseparatedchickenandtheirinfluenceonphysicochemicalattributesoffrankfurtertypesausages
AT lauraeyoder compositionaldifferencesamongtypesofmechanicallyseparatedchickenandtheirinfluenceonphysicochemicalattributesoffrankfurtertypesausages
AT rodrigotarte compositionaldifferencesamongtypesofmechanicallyseparatedchickenandtheirinfluenceonphysicochemicalattributesoffrankfurtertypesausages
AT stevenmlonergan compositionaldifferencesamongtypesofmechanicallyseparatedchickenandtheirinfluenceonphysicochemicalattributesoffrankfurtertypesausages