Compare of Transient Quality in Automatic Control Systems with Classic PID Algorithm and Optimal Regulator

Currently, about 90–95% of generic controllers use the PID algorithm to generate control actions, while 64% of the PID controllers are used in single-circuit automatic control systems. Most of industries (power industry among them) use hundreds of automatic control systems. The quality of their work...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. T. Kulakov, K. I. Artsiomenka
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Belarusian National Technical University 2019-04-01
Series:Izvestiâ Vysših Učebnyh Zavedenij i Ènergetičeskih ob Edinennij SNG. Ènergetika
Subjects:
Online Access:https://energy.bntu.by/jour/article/view/1502
_version_ 1797879776080297984
author G. T. Kulakov
K. I. Artsiomenka
author_facet G. T. Kulakov
K. I. Artsiomenka
author_sort G. T. Kulakov
collection DOAJ
description Currently, about 90–95% of generic controllers use the PID algorithm to generate control actions, while 64% of the PID controllers are used in single-circuit automatic control systems. Most of industries (power industry among them) use hundreds of automatic control systems. The quality of their work is the basis of economic efficiency of technical processes, ensuring safety, reliability, durability and environmental friendliness of both technological equipment and automation equipment. There are different modifications of PID-controller structure implementation. In practice the ideal PID controller with a filter and the classic PID regulator (serial connection of the ideal PI controller and the real PD regulator as the direct action elements) are widely used. The problem of choosing a rational structure and a method of parametric optimization of PID controllers, which provide the best direct indicatives of the quality in the development of the main effects in single-circuit automatic control systems, becomes urgent. However, only for the classical PID controllers, which are widely used at present, there are more than three hundred methods for adjusting the three parameters of the optimal dynamic adjustment, as well as the ballast time constant. This results in arising a problem of substantiation of the best structure and method of parametric optimization of classical PID regulators. As a basic option, one of the simplest and most obvious one, viz. the method of automated adjustment of the controller in the Simulink MatLab environment had been chosen, which was compared with the method of full compensation in general for objects with a transfer function in the form of an inertial link with a conditional delay. Two variants of control action realization on the basis of the structural scheme of the optimal regulator developed by the Belarusian national technical University were also offered. In contrast with the classic PID controller, the optimal controller has one parameter of dynamic adjustment setting. The results of simulation of transients at basic perturbations confirmed that the best direct indicatives of the quality are provided with an optimal regulator, which makes it possible to recommend it for wide implementation instead of the classic PID controllers.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:52:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6a7baf6f75a4af290e2e8a9b59a8b1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1029-7448
2414-0341
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T02:52:37Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Belarusian National Technical University
record_format Article
series Izvestiâ Vysših Učebnyh Zavedenij i Ènergetičeskih ob Edinennij SNG. Ènergetika
spelling doaj.art-e6a7baf6f75a4af290e2e8a9b59a8b1b2023-03-13T07:41:51ZrusBelarusian National Technical UniversityIzvestiâ Vysših Učebnyh Zavedenij i Ènergetičeskih ob Edinennij SNG. Ènergetika1029-74482414-03412019-04-0162219220010.21122/1029-7448-2019-62-2-192-2001429Compare of Transient Quality in Automatic Control Systems with Classic PID Algorithm and Optimal RegulatorG. T. Kulakov0K. I. Artsiomenka1Белорусский национальный технический университетБелорусский национальный технический университетCurrently, about 90–95% of generic controllers use the PID algorithm to generate control actions, while 64% of the PID controllers are used in single-circuit automatic control systems. Most of industries (power industry among them) use hundreds of automatic control systems. The quality of their work is the basis of economic efficiency of technical processes, ensuring safety, reliability, durability and environmental friendliness of both technological equipment and automation equipment. There are different modifications of PID-controller structure implementation. In practice the ideal PID controller with a filter and the classic PID regulator (serial connection of the ideal PI controller and the real PD regulator as the direct action elements) are widely used. The problem of choosing a rational structure and a method of parametric optimization of PID controllers, which provide the best direct indicatives of the quality in the development of the main effects in single-circuit automatic control systems, becomes urgent. However, only for the classical PID controllers, which are widely used at present, there are more than three hundred methods for adjusting the three parameters of the optimal dynamic adjustment, as well as the ballast time constant. This results in arising a problem of substantiation of the best structure and method of parametric optimization of classical PID regulators. As a basic option, one of the simplest and most obvious one, viz. the method of automated adjustment of the controller in the Simulink MatLab environment had been chosen, which was compared with the method of full compensation in general for objects with a transfer function in the form of an inertial link with a conditional delay. Two variants of control action realization on the basis of the structural scheme of the optimal regulator developed by the Belarusian national technical University were also offered. In contrast with the classic PID controller, the optimal controller has one parameter of dynamic adjustment setting. The results of simulation of transients at basic perturbations confirmed that the best direct indicatives of the quality are provided with an optimal regulator, which makes it possible to recommend it for wide implementation instead of the classic PID controllers.https://energy.bntu.by/jour/article/view/1502передаточная функцияпереходной процессклассический пид-регулятороптимальный регуляторпрямые показатели качестваодноконтурная система автоматического управления
spellingShingle G. T. Kulakov
K. I. Artsiomenka
Compare of Transient Quality in Automatic Control Systems with Classic PID Algorithm and Optimal Regulator
Izvestiâ Vysših Učebnyh Zavedenij i Ènergetičeskih ob Edinennij SNG. Ènergetika
передаточная функция
переходной процесс
классический пид-регулятор
оптимальный регулятор
прямые показатели качества
одноконтурная система автоматического управления
title Compare of Transient Quality in Automatic Control Systems with Classic PID Algorithm and Optimal Regulator
title_full Compare of Transient Quality in Automatic Control Systems with Classic PID Algorithm and Optimal Regulator
title_fullStr Compare of Transient Quality in Automatic Control Systems with Classic PID Algorithm and Optimal Regulator
title_full_unstemmed Compare of Transient Quality in Automatic Control Systems with Classic PID Algorithm and Optimal Regulator
title_short Compare of Transient Quality in Automatic Control Systems with Classic PID Algorithm and Optimal Regulator
title_sort compare of transient quality in automatic control systems with classic pid algorithm and optimal regulator
topic передаточная функция
переходной процесс
классический пид-регулятор
оптимальный регулятор
прямые показатели качества
одноконтурная система автоматического управления
url https://energy.bntu.by/jour/article/view/1502
work_keys_str_mv AT gtkulakov compareoftransientqualityinautomaticcontrolsystemswithclassicpidalgorithmandoptimalregulator
AT kiartsiomenka compareoftransientqualityinautomaticcontrolsystemswithclassicpidalgorithmandoptimalregulator