Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?

High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is a time-efficient training method suggested to improve health and fitness for the clinical population, healthy subjects, and athletes. Many parameters can impact the difficulty of HIIT sessions. This study aims to highlight and explain, through logical deduc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jérémy Briand, Jonathan Tremblay, Guy Thibault
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/1/10
_version_ 1797490367590825984
author Jérémy Briand
Jonathan Tremblay
Guy Thibault
author_facet Jérémy Briand
Jonathan Tremblay
Guy Thibault
author_sort Jérémy Briand
collection DOAJ
description High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is a time-efficient training method suggested to improve health and fitness for the clinical population, healthy subjects, and athletes. Many parameters can impact the difficulty of HIIT sessions. This study aims to highlight and explain, through logical deductions, some limitations of the Skiba and Coggan models, widely used to prescribe HIIT sessions in cycling. We simulated 6198 different HIIT training sessions leading to exhaustion, according to the Skiba and Coggan-Modified (modification of the Coggan model with the introduction of an exhaustion criterion) models, for three fictitious athlete profiles (Time-Trialist, All-Rounder, Sprinter). The simulation revealed impossible sessions (i.e., requiring athletes to surpass their maximal power output over the exercise interval duration), characterized by a few short exercise intervals, performed in the severe and extreme intensity domains, alternating with long recovery bouts. The fraction of impossible sessions depends on the athlete profile and ranges between 4.4 and 22.9% for the Skiba model and 0.6 and 3.2% for the Coggan-Modified model. For practitioners using these HIIT models, this study highlights the importance of understanding these models’ inherent limitations and mathematical assumptions to draw adequate conclusions from their use to prescribe HIIT sessions.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:31:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6a901f8707a493c92108876ca95167d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:31:59Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj.art-e6a901f8707a493c92108876ca95167d2023-11-23T15:24:00ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632022-01-011011010.3390/sports10010010Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?Jérémy Briand0Jonathan Tremblay1Guy Thibault2Institut National du Sport du Québec, 4141 Avenue Pierre-De-Coubertin, Montreal, QC H1V 3N7, CanadaÉcole de Kinésiologie et des Sciences de l’Activité Physique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, 2100 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaInstitut National du Sport du Québec, 4141 Avenue Pierre-De-Coubertin, Montreal, QC H1V 3N7, CanadaHigh-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is a time-efficient training method suggested to improve health and fitness for the clinical population, healthy subjects, and athletes. Many parameters can impact the difficulty of HIIT sessions. This study aims to highlight and explain, through logical deductions, some limitations of the Skiba and Coggan models, widely used to prescribe HIIT sessions in cycling. We simulated 6198 different HIIT training sessions leading to exhaustion, according to the Skiba and Coggan-Modified (modification of the Coggan model with the introduction of an exhaustion criterion) models, for three fictitious athlete profiles (Time-Trialist, All-Rounder, Sprinter). The simulation revealed impossible sessions (i.e., requiring athletes to surpass their maximal power output over the exercise interval duration), characterized by a few short exercise intervals, performed in the severe and extreme intensity domains, alternating with long recovery bouts. The fraction of impossible sessions depends on the athlete profile and ranges between 4.4 and 22.9% for the Skiba model and 0.6 and 3.2% for the Coggan-Modified model. For practitioners using these HIIT models, this study highlights the importance of understanding these models’ inherent limitations and mathematical assumptions to draw adequate conclusions from their use to prescribe HIIT sessions.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/1/10critical poweranaerobic reservemodelingexercise prescriptionintermittent exercise
spellingShingle Jérémy Briand
Jonathan Tremblay
Guy Thibault
Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?
Sports
critical power
anaerobic reserve
modeling
exercise prescription
intermittent exercise
title Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?
title_full Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?
title_fullStr Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?
title_full_unstemmed Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?
title_short Can Popular High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Models Lead to Impossible Training Sessions?
title_sort can popular high intensity interval training hiit models lead to impossible training sessions
topic critical power
anaerobic reserve
modeling
exercise prescription
intermittent exercise
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/1/10
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremybriand canpopularhighintensityintervaltraininghiitmodelsleadtoimpossibletrainingsessions
AT jonathantremblay canpopularhighintensityintervaltraininghiitmodelsleadtoimpossibletrainingsessions
AT guythibault canpopularhighintensityintervaltraininghiitmodelsleadtoimpossibletrainingsessions