On-site stormwater detention for Australian development projects: Does it meet frequent flow management objectives?

On-site stormwater detention (OSD) is a conventional component of urban drainage systems, designed with the intention of mitigating the increase to peak discharge of stormwater runoff that inevitably results from urbanization. In Australia, singular temporal patterns for design storms have governed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodney Ronalds, Alex Rowlands, Hong Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-03-01
Series:Water Science and Engineering
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237019300213
_version_ 1811213734055510016
author Rodney Ronalds
Alex Rowlands
Hong Zhang
author_facet Rodney Ronalds
Alex Rowlands
Hong Zhang
author_sort Rodney Ronalds
collection DOAJ
description On-site stormwater detention (OSD) is a conventional component of urban drainage systems, designed with the intention of mitigating the increase to peak discharge of stormwater runoff that inevitably results from urbanization. In Australia, singular temporal patterns for design storms have governed the inputs of hydrograph generation and in turn the design process of OSD for the last three decades. This paper raises the concern that many existing OSD systems designed using the singular temporal pattern for design storms may not be achieving their stated objectives when they are assessed against a variety of alternative temporal patterns. The performance of twenty real OSD systems was investigated using two methods: (1) ensembles of design temporal patterns prescribed in the latest version of Australian Rainfall and Runoff, and (2) real recorded rainfall data taken from pluviograph stations modeled with continuous simulation. It is shown conclusively that the use of singular temporal patterns is ineffective in providing assurance that an OSD will mitigate the increase to peak discharge for all possible storm events. Ensemble analysis is shown to provide improved results. However, it also falls short of providing any guarantee in the face of naturally occurring rainfall. Keywords: Stormwater detention, Frequent flow management, Temporal patterns, Runoff routing, Continuous simulation, South East Queensland
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:51:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e6b11493afe14485b007bb4aada2534c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1674-2370
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:51:07Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Water Science and Engineering
spelling doaj.art-e6b11493afe14485b007bb4aada2534c2022-12-22T03:45:18ZengElsevierWater Science and Engineering1674-23702019-03-01121110On-site stormwater detention for Australian development projects: Does it meet frequent flow management objectives?Rodney Ronalds0Alex Rowlands1Hong Zhang2School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4216, Australia; Michael Bale & Associates Pty Ltd., Gold Coast 4216, Australia; Corresponding author.Michael Bale & Associates Pty Ltd., Gold Coast 4216, AustraliaSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4216, AustraliaOn-site stormwater detention (OSD) is a conventional component of urban drainage systems, designed with the intention of mitigating the increase to peak discharge of stormwater runoff that inevitably results from urbanization. In Australia, singular temporal patterns for design storms have governed the inputs of hydrograph generation and in turn the design process of OSD for the last three decades. This paper raises the concern that many existing OSD systems designed using the singular temporal pattern for design storms may not be achieving their stated objectives when they are assessed against a variety of alternative temporal patterns. The performance of twenty real OSD systems was investigated using two methods: (1) ensembles of design temporal patterns prescribed in the latest version of Australian Rainfall and Runoff, and (2) real recorded rainfall data taken from pluviograph stations modeled with continuous simulation. It is shown conclusively that the use of singular temporal patterns is ineffective in providing assurance that an OSD will mitigate the increase to peak discharge for all possible storm events. Ensemble analysis is shown to provide improved results. However, it also falls short of providing any guarantee in the face of naturally occurring rainfall. Keywords: Stormwater detention, Frequent flow management, Temporal patterns, Runoff routing, Continuous simulation, South East Queenslandhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237019300213
spellingShingle Rodney Ronalds
Alex Rowlands
Hong Zhang
On-site stormwater detention for Australian development projects: Does it meet frequent flow management objectives?
Water Science and Engineering
title On-site stormwater detention for Australian development projects: Does it meet frequent flow management objectives?
title_full On-site stormwater detention for Australian development projects: Does it meet frequent flow management objectives?
title_fullStr On-site stormwater detention for Australian development projects: Does it meet frequent flow management objectives?
title_full_unstemmed On-site stormwater detention for Australian development projects: Does it meet frequent flow management objectives?
title_short On-site stormwater detention for Australian development projects: Does it meet frequent flow management objectives?
title_sort on site stormwater detention for australian development projects does it meet frequent flow management objectives
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237019300213
work_keys_str_mv AT rodneyronalds onsitestormwaterdetentionforaustraliandevelopmentprojectsdoesitmeetfrequentflowmanagementobjectives
AT alexrowlands onsitestormwaterdetentionforaustraliandevelopmentprojectsdoesitmeetfrequentflowmanagementobjectives
AT hongzhang onsitestormwaterdetentionforaustraliandevelopmentprojectsdoesitmeetfrequentflowmanagementobjectives